Linux-mediatek Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, drinkcat@chromium.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fparent@baylibre.com,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, hsinyi@chromium.org,
	Collabora Kernel ML <kernel@collabora.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add new driver for SCPSYS power domains controller
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:57:08 +0200
Message-ID: <181df5c6-9046-5273-879b-ed0d1a59c8b3@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f2185b28-0b1f-8cf9-8717-12e28cf2bbf0@gmail.com>

Hi,

On 9/10/20 14:50, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 06/10/2020 08:53, Weiyi Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 16:04 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>>
>>> On 25/09/2020 12:06, Weiyi Lu wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 19:28 +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a new driver with the aim to deprecate the mtk-scpsys driver.
>>>>> The problem with that driver is that, in order to support more Mediatek
>>>>> SoCs you need to add some logic to handle properly the power-up
>>>>> sequence of newer Mediatek SoCs, doesn't handle parent-child power
>>>>> domains and need to hardcode all the clocks in the driver itself. The
>>>>> result is that the driver is getting bigger and bigger every time a
>>>>> new SoC needs to be supported.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Enric and Matthias,
>>>>
>>>> First of all, thank you for the patch. But I'm worried the problem you
>>>> mentioned won't be solved even if we work on this new driver in the
>>>> future. My work on the MT8183 scpsys(now v17) is to implement the new
>>>> hardware logic. Here, I also see related patches, which means that these
>>>> new logics are necessary. Why can't we work on the original driver?
>>>
>>> Well the decision was to change the driver in a not compatible way to make
>>> device tree entries better. If we work on the old driver, we would need to find
>>> some creative ways to handle old bindings vs new bindings.
>>>
>>> So I thought it would be better doing a fresh start implementing mt1873 support
>>> for reference and add mt8183 as new SoC. From what I have seen mt8192 and others
>>> fit the driver structure too.
>>>
>>>> Meanwhile, I thought maybe we should separate the driver into general
>>>> control and platform data for each SoC, otherwise it'll keep getting
>>>> bigger and bigger if it need to be support new SoC.
>>>>
>>>
>>> We could in a later series split the SoC depended data structures and put them
>>> in drivers/soc/mediatek/pm-domains-mt8183.h or something like this. Is that what
>>> you mean?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, that is what I want. And I guess it could avoid the collisions in
>> the different defines to the control registers and power status bits you
>> mentioned. Hope this will happen in this series.
>>
> 
> Sounds good to me. Enric could you move the soc specific data to separate
> include files?
> 

Sure, I'll do this in v4.

Thanks,
 Enric

> Regards,
> Matthias
> 

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

      reply index

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-10 17:28 Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-09-10 17:28 ` [PATCH 01/12] dt-bindings: power: Add bindings for the Mediatek " Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-09-11 23:02   ` Rob Herring
2020-09-14  8:59     ` Matthias Brugger
2020-09-14  9:49       ` Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-09-22 22:36       ` Rob Herring
2020-09-23 16:12         ` Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-09-10 17:28 ` [PATCH 02/12] soc: mediatek: Add MediaTek SCPSYS power domains Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-09-25 10:25   ` Weiyi Lu
2020-09-25 10:43     ` Matthias Brugger
2020-09-10 17:28 ` [PATCH 03/12] arm64: dts: mediatek: Add mt8173 power domain controller Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-09-18 20:20   ` Fabien Parent
2020-09-18 20:50     ` Enric Balletbo Serra
2020-09-10 17:28 ` [PATCH 04/12] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add bus protection protocol Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-09-10 17:28 ` [PATCH 05/12] soc: mediatek: pm_domains: Make bus protection generic Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-09-10 17:28 ` [PATCH 06/12] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add SMI block as bus protection block Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-09-25 10:45   ` Weiyi Lu
2020-09-25 11:01     ` Matthias Brugger
2020-09-10 17:28 ` [PATCH 07/12] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add extra sram control Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-09-10 18:27   ` Matthias Brugger
2020-10-26 15:16     ` Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-09-10 17:28 ` [PATCH 08/12] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add subsystem clocks Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-09-25 10:55   ` Weiyi Lu
2020-09-25 12:20     ` Matthias Brugger
2020-09-10 17:28 ` [PATCH 09/12] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Allow bus protection to ignore clear ack Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-09-10 17:28 ` [PATCH 10/12] dt-bindings: power: Add MT8183 power domains Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-09-10 17:28 ` [PATCH 11/12] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add support for mt8183 Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-09-16  9:46   ` Matthias Brugger
2020-09-16 12:19     ` Matthias Brugger
2020-09-25  7:37       ` Hsin-Yi Wang
2020-09-25  8:21         ` Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-09-25  9:07           ` Matthias Brugger
2020-09-10 17:28 ` [PATCH 12/12] arm64: dts: mediatek: Add mt8183 power domains controller Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-09-25 10:06 ` [PATCH 00/12] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add new driver for SCPSYS " Weiyi Lu
2020-09-25 14:04   ` Matthias Brugger
2020-10-06  6:53     ` Weiyi Lu
2020-10-09 12:50       ` Matthias Brugger
2020-10-09 13:57         ` Enric Balletbo i Serra [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=181df5c6-9046-5273-879b-ed0d1a59c8b3@collabora.com \
    --to=enric.balletbo@collabora.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=fparent@baylibre.com \
    --cc=hsinyi@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=weiyi.lu@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-mediatek Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/0 linux-mediatek/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-mediatek linux-mediatek/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek \
		linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
	public-inbox-index linux-mediatek

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.infradead.lists.linux-mediatek


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git