linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 0/9] disable pcplists during memory offline
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:37:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200922143712.12048-1-vbabka@suse.cz> (raw)

As per the discussions [1] [2] this is an attempt to implement David's
suggestion that page isolation should disable pcplists to avoid races with page
freeing in progress. This is done without extra checks in fast paths, as
explained in Patch 9. The repeated draining done by [2] is then no longer
needed. Previous version (RFC) is at [3].

The RFC tried to hide pcplists disabling/enabling into page isolation, but it
wasn't completely possible, as memory offline does not unisolation. Michal
suggested an explicit API in [4] so that's the current implementation and it
seems indeed nicer.

Once we accept that page isolation users need to do explicit actions around it
depending on the needed guarantees, we can also IMHO accept that the current
pcplist draining can be also done by the callers, which is more effective.
After all, there are only two users of page isolation. So patch 7 does
effectively the same thing as Pavel proposed in [5], and patches 8-9 implement
stronger guarantees only for memory offline. If CMA decides to opt-in to the
stronger guarantee, it's easy to do so.

Patches 1-6 are preparatory cleanups for pcplist disabling.

Patchset was briefly tested in QEMU so that memory online/offline works, but
I haven't done a stress test that would prove the race fixed by [2] is
eliminated.

Note that patch 9 could be avoided if we instead adjusted page freeing in shown
in [6], but I believe the current implementation of disabling pcplists is not
too much complex, so I would prefer this instead of adding new checks and
longer irq-disabled section into page freeing hotpaths.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200901124615.137200-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200903140032.380431-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200907163628.26495-1-vbabka@suse.cz/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200909113647.GG7348@dhcp22.suse.cz/
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200904151448.100489-3-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com/
[6] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/3d3b53db-aeaa-ff24-260b-36427fac9b1c@suse.cz/

Vlastimil Babka (9):
  mm, page_alloc: clean up pageset high and batch update
  mm, page_alloc: calculate pageset high and batch once per zone
  mm, page_alloc: remove setup_pageset()
  mm, page_alloc: simplify pageset_update()
  mm, page_alloc: make per_cpu_pageset accessible only after init
  mm, page_alloc: cache pageset high and batch in struct zone
  mm, page_alloc: move draining pcplists to page isolation users
  mm, page_alloc: drain all pcplists during memory offline
  mm, page_alloc: optionally disable pcplists during page isolation

 include/linux/gfp.h            |   1 +
 include/linux/mmzone.h         |   8 ++
 include/linux/page-isolation.h |   2 +
 mm/internal.h                  |   4 +
 mm/memory_hotplug.c            |  27 +++--
 mm/page_alloc.c                | 190 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
 mm/page_isolation.c            |  26 ++++-
 7 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)

-- 
2.28.0



             reply	other threads:[~2020-09-22 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-22 14:37 Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2020-09-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm, page_alloc: clean up pageset high and batch update Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-25 10:18   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-10-05 12:03   ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm, page_alloc: calculate pageset high and batch once per zone Vlastimil Babka
2020-10-05 12:52   ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-06 22:04     ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm, page_alloc: remove setup_pageset() Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-25 10:19   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-10-05 12:59   ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-06 22:11     ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm, page_alloc: simplify pageset_update() Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-25 10:23   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-10-05 13:20   ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 5/9] mm, page_alloc: make per_cpu_pageset accessible only after init Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-25 10:25   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-10-05 13:24   ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-06 22:28     ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 6/9] mm, page_alloc: cache pageset high and batch in struct zone Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-25 10:34   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-10-06 22:31     ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-10-05 13:28   ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-06 22:34     ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 7/9] mm, page_alloc: move draining pcplists to page isolation users Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-25 10:39   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-10-05 13:57   ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 8/9] mm, page_alloc: drain all pcplists during memory offline Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-25 10:46   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-10-05 14:03     ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm, page_alloc: optionally disable pcplists during page isolation Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-25 10:53   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-25 10:54     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-25 11:10       ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-10-01  8:47         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-10-05 14:05         ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-05 14:22           ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-10-05 16:56             ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-06  8:34   ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-06  8:40     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-10-06 10:05       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-22 17:15 ` [PATCH 0/9] disable pcplists during memory offline David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200922143712.12048-1-vbabka@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 0/9] disable pcplists during memory offline' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).