linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
To: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya@linux.ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Brice Goglin <brice.goglin@gmail.com>,
	Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
	Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Subject: Re: RFC: Memory Tiering Kernel Interfaces
Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 09:57:54 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v8ujh6ow.fsf@nvdebian.thelocal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAPL-u9sVx94ACSuCVN8V0tKp+AMxiY89cro0japtyB=xNfNBw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8235 bytes --]

Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com> writes:

> The current kernel has the basic memory tiering support: Inactive
> pages on a higher tier NUMA node can be migrated (demoted) to a lower
> tier NUMA node to make room for new allocations on the higher tier
> NUMA node.  Frequently accessed pages on a lower tier NUMA node can be
> migrated (promoted) to a higher tier NUMA node to improve the
> performance.
>
> A tiering relationship between NUMA nodes in the form of demotion path
> is created during the kernel initialization and updated when a NUMA
> node is hot-added or hot-removed.  The current implementation puts all
> nodes with CPU into the top tier, and then builds the tiering hierarchy
> tier-by-tier by establishing the per-node demotion targets based on
> the distances between nodes.
>
> The current memory tiering interface needs to be improved to address
> several important use cases:
>
> * The current tiering initialization code always initializes
>   each memory-only NUMA node into a lower tier.  But a memory-only
>   NUMA node may have a high performance memory device (e.g. a DRAM
>   device attached via CXL.mem or a DRAM-backed memory-only node on
>   a virtual machine) and should be put into the top tier.
>
> * The current tiering hierarchy always puts CPU nodes into the top
>   tier. But on a system with HBM (e.g. GPU memory) devices, these
>   memory-only HBM NUMA nodes should be in the top tier, and DRAM nodes
>   with CPUs are better to be placed into the next lower tier.
>
> * Also because the current tiering hierarchy always puts CPU nodes
>   into the top tier, when a CPU is hot-added (or hot-removed) and
>   triggers a memory node from CPU-less into a CPU node (or vice
>   versa), the memory tiering hierarchy gets changed, even though no
>   memory node is added or removed.  This can make the tiering
>   hierarchy much less stable.
>
> * A higher tier node can only be demoted to selected nodes on the
>   next lower tier, not any other node from the next lower tier.  This
>   strict, hard-coded demotion order does not work in all use cases
>   (e.g. some use cases may want to allow cross-socket demotion to
>   another node in the same demotion tier as a fallback when the
>   preferred demotion node is out of space), and has resulted in the
>   feature request for an interface to override the system-wide,
>   per-node demotion order from the userspace.
>
> * There are no interfaces for the userspace to learn about the memory
>   tiering hierarchy in order to optimize its memory allocations.
>
> I'd like to propose revised memory tiering kernel interfaces based on
> the discussions in the threads:
>
> - <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220425201728.5kzm4seu7rep7ndr@offworld/T/>
> - <https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220426114300.00003ad8@Huawei.com/t/>
>
>
> Sysfs Interfaces
> `=============='
>
> * /sys/devices/system/node/memory_tiers
>
>   Format: node list (one tier per line, in the tier order)
>
>   When read, list memory nodes by tiers.
>
>   When written (one tier per line), take the user-provided node-tier
>   assignment as the new tiering hierarchy and rebuild the per-node
>   demotion order.  It is allowed to only override the top tiers, in
>   which cases, the kernel will establish the lower tiers automatically.
>
>
> Kernel Representation
> `==================='
>
> * nodemask_t node_states[N_TOPTIER_MEMORY]
>
>   Store all top-tier memory nodes.
>
> * nodemask_t memory_tiers[MAX_TIERS]
>
>   Store memory nodes by tiers.
>
> * struct demotion_nodes node_demotion[]
>
>   where: struct demotion_nodes { nodemask_t preferred; nodemask_t allowed; }
>
>   For a node N:
>
>   node_demotion[N].preferred lists all preferred demotion targets;
>
>   node_demotion[N].allowed lists all allowed demotion targets
>   (initialized to be all the nodes in the same demotion tier).
>
>
> Tiering Hierarchy Initialization
> `=============================='
>
> By default, all memory nodes are in the top tier (N_TOPTIER_MEMORY).
>
> A device driver can remove its memory nodes from the top tier, e.g.
> a dax driver can remove PMEM nodes from the top tier.
>
> The kernel builds the memory tiering hierarchy and per-node demotion
> order tier-by-tier starting from N_TOPTIER_MEMORY.  For a node N, the
> best distance nodes in the next lower tier are assigned to
> node_demotion[N].preferred and all the nodes in the next lower tier
> are assigned to node_demotion[N].allowed.
>
> node_demotion[N].preferred can be empty if no preferred demotion node
> is available for node N.
>
> If the userspace overrides the tiers via the memory_tiers sysfs
> interface, the kernel then only rebuilds the per-node demotion order
> accordingly.
>
> Memory tiering hierarchy is rebuilt upon hot-add or hot-remove of a
> memory node, but is NOT rebuilt upon hot-add or hot-remove of a CPU
> node.
>
>
> Memory Allocation for Demotion
> `============================'
>
> When allocating a new demotion target page, both a preferred node
> and the allowed nodemask are provided to the allocation function.
> The default kernel allocation fallback order is used to allocate the
> page from the specified node and nodemask.
>
> The memopolicy of cpuset, vma and owner task of the source page can
> be set to refine the demotion nodemask, e.g. to prevent demotion or
> select a particular allowed node as the demotion target.
>
>
> Examples
> `======'
>
> * Example 1:
>   Node 0 & 1 are DRAM nodes, node 2 & 3 are PMEM nodes.
>
>   Node 0 has node 2 as the preferred demotion target and can also
>   fallback demotion to node 3.
>
>   Node 1 has node 3 as the preferred demotion target and can also
>   fallback demotion to node 2.
>
>   Set mempolicy to prevent cross-socket demotion and memory access,
>   e.g. cpuset.mems=0,2
>
> node distances:
> node   0    1    2    3
>    0  10   20   30   40
>    1  20   10   40   30
>    2  30   40   10   40
>    3  40   30   40   10
>
> /sys/devices/system/node/memory_tiers
> 0-1
> 2-3
>
> N_TOPTIER_MEMORY: 0-1
>
> node_demotion[]:
>   0: [2], [2-3]
>   1: [3], [2-3]
>   2: [],  []
>   3: [],  []
>
> * Example 2:
>   Node 0 & 1 are DRAM nodes.
>   Node 2 is a PMEM node and closer to node 0.
>
>   Node 0 has node 2 as the preferred and only demotion target.
>
>   Node 1 has no preferred demotion target, but can still demote
>   to node 2.
>
>   Set mempolicy to prevent cross-socket demotion and memory access,
>   e.g. cpuset.mems=0,2
>
> node distances:
> node   0    1    2
>    0  10   20   30
>    1  20   10   40
>    2  30   40   10
>
> /sys/devices/system/node/memory_tiers
> 0-1
> 2
>
> N_TOPTIER_MEMORY: 0-1
>
> node_demotion[]:
>   0: [2], [2]
>   1: [],  [2]
>   2: [],  []
>
>
> * Example 3:
>   Node 0 & 1 are DRAM nodes.
>   Node 2 is a PMEM node and has the same distance to node 0 & 1.
>
>   Node 0 has node 2 as the preferred and only demotion target.
>
>   Node 1 has node 2 as the preferred and only demotion target.
>
> node distances:
> node   0    1    2
>    0  10   20   30
>    1  20   10   30
>    2  30   30   10
>
> /sys/devices/system/node/memory_tiers
> 0-1
> 2
>
> N_TOPTIER_MEMORY: 0-1
>
> node_demotion[]:
>   0: [2], [2]
>   1: [2], [2]
>   2: [],  []
>
>
> * Example 4:
>   Node 0 & 1 are DRAM nodes, Node 2 is a memory-only DRAM node.
>
>   All nodes are top-tier.
>
> node distances:
> node   0    1    2
>    0  10   20   30
>    1  20   10   30
>    2  30   30   10
>
> /sys/devices/system/node/memory_tiers
> 0-2
>
> N_TOPTIER_MEMORY: 0-2
>
> node_demotion[]:
>   0: [],  []
>   1: [],  []
>   2: [],  []
>
>
> * Example 5:
>   Node 0 is a DRAM node with CPU.
>   Node 1 is a HBM node.
>   Node 2 is a PMEM node.
>
>   With userspace override, node 1 is the top tier and has node 0 as
>   the preferred and only demotion target.
>
>   Node 0 is in the second tier, tier 1, and has node 2 as the
>   preferred and only demotion target.
>
>   Node 2 is in the lowest tier, tier 2, and has no demotion targets.
>
> node distances:
> node   0    1    2
>    0  10   21   30
>    1  21   10   40
>    2  30   40   10
>
> /sys/devices/system/node/memory_tiers (userspace override)
> 1
> 0
> 2
>
> N_TOPTIER_MEMORY: 1
>
> node_demotion[]:
>   0: [2], [2]
>   1: [0], [0]
>   2: [],  []
>
> -- Wei

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-05 23:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-30  2:10 RFC: Memory Tiering Kernel Interfaces Wei Xu
2022-04-30  3:59 ` Yang Shi
2022-04-30  6:37   ` Wei Xu
2022-05-06  0:01     ` Alistair Popple
2022-05-10  4:32       ` Wei Xu
2022-05-10  5:37         ` Alistair Popple
2022-05-10 11:38           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-05-11  5:30             ` Wei Xu
2022-05-11  7:34               ` Alistair Popple
2022-05-11  7:49               ` ying.huang
2022-05-11 17:07                 ` Wei Xu
2022-05-12  1:42                   ` ying.huang
2022-05-12  2:39                     ` Wei Xu
2022-05-12  3:13                       ` ying.huang
2022-05-12  3:37                         ` Wei Xu
2022-05-12  6:24                         ` Wei Xu
2022-05-06 18:56     ` Yang Shi
2022-05-09 14:32       ` Hesham Almatary
2022-05-10  3:24         ` Yang Shi
2022-05-10  9:59           ` Hesham Almatary
2022-05-10 12:10             ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-05-11  5:42               ` Wei Xu
2022-05-11  7:12                 ` Alistair Popple
2022-05-11  9:05                   ` Hesham Almatary
2022-05-12  3:02                     ` ying.huang
2022-05-12  4:40                   ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-05-12  4:49                     ` Wei Xu
2022-05-10  4:22         ` Wei Xu
2022-05-10 10:01           ` Hesham Almatary
2022-05-10 11:44           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-05-01 18:35   ` Dan Williams
2022-05-03  6:36     ` Wei Xu
2022-05-06 19:05     ` Yang Shi
2022-05-07  7:56     ` ying.huang
2022-05-01 17:58 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2022-05-02  1:04   ` David Rientjes
2022-05-02  7:23   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-05-03  2:07   ` Baolin Wang
2022-05-03  6:06   ` Wei Xu
2022-05-03 17:14   ` Alistair Popple
2022-05-03 17:47     ` Dave Hansen
2022-05-03 22:35       ` Alistair Popple
2022-05-03 23:54         ` Dave Hansen
2022-05-04  1:31           ` Wei Xu
2022-05-04 17:02             ` Dave Hansen
2022-05-05  6:35               ` Wei Xu
2022-05-05 14:24                 ` Dave Hansen
2022-05-10  4:43                   ` Wei Xu
2022-05-02  6:25 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-05-03  7:02   ` Wei Xu
2022-05-02 15:20 ` Dave Hansen
2022-05-03  7:19   ` Wei Xu
2022-05-03 19:12 ` Tim Chen
2022-05-05  7:02   ` Wei Xu
2022-05-05  8:57 ` ying.huang
2022-05-05 23:57 ` Alistair Popple [this message]
2022-05-06  0:25   ` Alistair Popple

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v8ujh6ow.fsf@nvdebian.thelocal \
    --to=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=brice.goglin@gmail.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=jvgediya@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).