* linux-next: old trees
@ 2013-09-17 7:01 Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-17 11:14 ` Sekhar Nori
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2013-09-17 7:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-next; +Cc: LKML, Andrew Morton, Linus
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1738 bytes --]
Hi all,
This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below,
so apologies if you get two copies.
I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in
linux-next. Below I have listed all the trees that have not been
commited to in the past 6 months. Please let me know if the tree is not
longer in use. I don't mind keeping these trees in linux-next if they
will have continued use, but would like to remove any that are no longer
needed.
Tree Last commit
---- -----------
4xx 1 year, 4 months ago
apm 1 year, 5 months ago
asm-generic 9 months ago
audit 1 year, 8 months ago
audit-current 1 year, 8 months ago
configfs 1 year, 10 months ago
cpupowerutils 1 year, 7 months ago
cputime 1 year, 9 months ago
davinci 2 years, 2 months ago
dwmw2 6 months ago
dwmw2-iommu 9 months ago
embedded 5 years ago
firmware 4 years, 4 months ago
fsnotify 9 months ago
fw-nohz 10 months ago
hsi 1 year, 8 months ago
hwpoison 2 years, 11 months ago
hwspinlock 2 years ago
ibft 1 year, 9 months ago
isci 1 year, 2 months ago
ixp4xx 7 months ago
jc_docs 2 years, 6 months ago
kconfig 12 months ago
kgdb 7 months ago
logfs 10 months ago
lzo-update 7 months ago
ocfs2 1 year, 1 month ago
omfs 1 year, 11 months ago
openrisc 6 months ago
osd 9 months ago
parisc 8 months ago
pcmcia 1 year, 7 months ago
pstore 6 months ago
random 7 months ago
sh 7 months ago
sh-current 1 year, 2 months ago
swiotlb 11 months ago
sysctl 1 year, 6 months ago
tmem 11 months ago
uclinux 7 months ago
unicore32 10 months ago
uprobes 1 year, 6 months ago
viafb 1 year, 6 months ago
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: old trees
2013-09-17 7:01 linux-next: old trees Stephen Rothwell
@ 2013-09-17 11:14 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-09-17 23:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-17 12:53 ` Josh Boyer
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Sekhar Nori @ 2013-09-17 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, LKML, Andrew Morton, Linus
Hi Stephen,
On Tuesday 17 September 2013 12:31 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below,
> so apologies if you get two copies.
>
> I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in
> linux-next. Below I have listed all the trees that have not been
> commited to in the past 6 months. Please let me know if the tree is not
> longer in use. I don't mind keeping these trees in linux-next if they
> will have continued use, but would like to remove any that are no longer
> needed.
>
> Tree Last commit
> ---- -----------
> davinci 2 years, 2 months ago
You can remove the davinci tree from linux-next since the patches are
now reaching linux-next through ARM-SoC tree. Apologies for not asking
you to remove it for so long.
Regards,
Sekhar
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: old trees
2013-09-17 7:01 linux-next: old trees Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-17 11:14 ` Sekhar Nori
@ 2013-09-17 12:53 ` Josh Boyer
2013-09-17 23:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-17 15:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Josh Boyer @ 2013-09-17 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, LKML, Andrew Morton, Linus
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below,
> so apologies if you get two copies.
>
> I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in
> linux-next. Below I have listed all the trees that have not been
> commited to in the past 6 months. Please let me know if the tree is not
> longer in use. I don't mind keeping these trees in linux-next if they
> will have continued use, but would like to remove any that are no longer
> needed.
>
> Tree Last commit
> ---- -----------
> 4xx 1 year, 4 months ago
This is subarch is basically in maintenance mode. There have only
been a handful of patches that have been submitted over the past year,
and I've ACKed them for Ben to bring in via his tree. The arch isn't
dead, but it's certainly not going to have much in the way of new
changes. The overall powerpc tree is probably sufficient for
linux-next.
josh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: old trees
2013-09-17 7:01 linux-next: old trees Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-17 11:14 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-09-17 12:53 ` Josh Boyer
@ 2013-09-17 15:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-09-20 18:35 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-25 13:27 ` Jonathan Corbet
4 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2013-09-17 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, LKML, Andrew Morton, Linus
On Tuesday 17 September 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> asm-generic 9 months ago
I occasionally use this tree, but in most releases all asm-generic patches tend to
go along with whatever patch series needs them, since asm-generic changes are
typically done whenever we add some code to the kernel elsewhere. Please keep this
one.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: old trees
2013-09-17 11:14 ` Sekhar Nori
@ 2013-09-17 23:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2013-09-17 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sekhar Nori; +Cc: linux-next, LKML, Andrew Morton, Linus
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 383 bytes --]
Hi Sekhar,
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:44:32 +0530 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> wrote:
>
> You can remove the davinci tree from linux-next since the patches are
> now reaching linux-next through ARM-SoC tree. Apologies for not asking
> you to remove it for so long.
Done.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.auhttp://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: old trees
2013-09-17 12:53 ` Josh Boyer
@ 2013-09-17 23:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2013-09-17 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josh Boyer; +Cc: linux-next, LKML, Andrew Morton, Linus
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 585 bytes --]
Hi Josh,
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:53:16 -0400 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 4xx 1 year, 4 months ago
>
> This is subarch is basically in maintenance mode. There have only
> been a handful of patches that have been submitted over the past year,
> and I've ACKed them for Ben to bring in via his tree. The arch isn't
> dead, but it's certainly not going to have much in the way of new
> changes. The overall powerpc tree is probably sufficient for
> linux-next.
Removed.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: old trees
2013-09-17 7:01 linux-next: old trees Stephen Rothwell
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-09-17 15:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2013-09-20 18:35 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-23 0:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-25 13:27 ` Jonathan Corbet
4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk @ 2013-09-20 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, LKML, Andrew Morton, Linus
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 05:01:24PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below,
> so apologies if you get two copies.
>
> I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in
> linux-next. Below I have listed all the trees that have not been
> commited to in the past 6 months. Please let me know if the tree is not
> longer in use. I don't mind keeping these trees in linux-next if they
> will have continued use, but would like to remove any that are no longer
> needed.
Thank you for the prunning effort.
> ibft 1 year, 9 months ago
Can go away.
> swiotlb 11 months ago
Need it. Don't remove it pls.
> tmem 11 months ago
Can go away.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: old trees
2013-09-20 18:35 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
@ 2013-09-23 0:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2013-09-23 0:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; +Cc: linux-next, LKML, Andrew Morton, Linus
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 376 bytes --]
Hi Konrad,
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 14:35:17 -0400 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> > ibft 1 year, 9 months ago
>
> Can go away.
>
> > swiotlb 11 months ago
>
> Need it. Don't remove it pls.
>
> > tmem 11 months ago
>
> Can go away.
OK, 2 removed. Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: old trees
2013-09-17 7:01 linux-next: old trees Stephen Rothwell
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-09-20 18:35 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
@ 2013-09-25 13:27 ` Jonathan Corbet
2013-09-25 23:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
4 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2013-09-25 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, LKML, Andrew Morton, Linus
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:01:24 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> jc_docs 2 years, 6 months ago
I was afraid it would be the oldest tree on the list, but it's not even
close...:)
I've been meaning to do some stuff there for a bit; the problem is that
life keeps getting in the way. If it's not a hassle for you, I'd just
as soon keep it around, things have *got* to clear out one of these
days...
Thanks,
jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: old trees
2013-09-25 13:27 ` Jonathan Corbet
@ 2013-09-25 23:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2013-09-25 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Corbet; +Cc: linux-next, LKML, Andrew Morton, Linus
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 685 bytes --]
Hi Jon,
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:27:29 -0600 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:01:24 +1000
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> > jc_docs 2 years, 6 months ago
>
> I was afraid it would be the oldest tree on the list, but it's not even
> close...:)
Yeah, amazing innit! ;-)
> I've been meaning to do some stuff there for a bit; the problem is that
> life keeps getting in the way. If it's not a hassle for you, I'd just
> as soon keep it around, things have *got* to clear out one of these
> days...
No worries, consider it preserved :-)
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-09-25 23:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-09-17 7:01 linux-next: old trees Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-17 11:14 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-09-17 23:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-17 12:53 ` Josh Boyer
2013-09-17 23:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-17 15:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-09-20 18:35 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-23 0:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-25 13:27 ` Jonathan Corbet
2013-09-25 23:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).