From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
To: "bcodding@redhat.com" <bcodding@redhat.com>
Cc: "bfields@fieldses.org" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"aglo@umich.edu" <aglo@umich.edu>,
"chuck.lever@oracle.com" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: unsharing tcp connections from different NFS mounts
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 18:19:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e6860bc5f72e3e0d1c4be9e577e83221aecd1a8.camel@hammerspace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7755CA77-7ABB-438A-A6E1-C3A73A54B7B3@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2020-10-07 at 14:04 -0400, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
> On 7 Oct 2020, at 12:44, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > I did see Igor's claim that there is a QoS issue (which afaics
> > would
> > also affect NFSv3), but why do I care about QoS as a per-mountpoint
> > feature?
>
> Because it's hard to do QoS without being able to classify the
> traffic on
> the network somehow. The separate connection makes it a lot
> easier. I see
> how that's - not our problem -, though.
>
> The regular admin might find it surprising to tell their system to
> connect to a specific IP address at mount time, and it instead sends
> the
> mount's traffic elsewhere.
>
> Are you happy with the state of nconnect, or is there room for
> something
> more dynamic?
>
I think there is room for improvement. We did say that we wanted to
eventually hand control over to a userspace policy daemon which should
be able to manage the number of connections based on demand and
networking conditions.
However as I already pointed out, NFSv4.1 also has congestion control
at the session level which may be playing a role here.
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-07 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-06 15:13 unsharing tcp connections from different NFS mounts J. Bruce Fields
2020-10-06 15:20 ` Chuck Lever
2020-10-06 15:22 ` Bruce Fields
2020-10-06 17:07 ` Tom Talpey
2020-10-06 19:30 ` Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <CAGrwUG5_KeRVR8chcA8=3FSeii2+4c8FbuE=CSGAtYVYqV4kLg@mail.gmail.com>
2020-10-07 14:08 ` Tom Talpey
2020-10-06 19:36 ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-10-06 21:46 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2020-10-07 0:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2020-10-07 11:27 ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-10-07 12:55 ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-10-07 13:45 ` Chuck Lever
2020-10-07 14:05 ` Bruce Fields
2020-10-07 14:15 ` Chuck Lever
2020-10-07 16:05 ` Bruce Fields
2020-10-07 16:44 ` Trond Myklebust
2020-10-07 17:15 ` Bruce Fields
2020-10-07 17:29 ` Trond Myklebust
2020-10-07 18:05 ` bfields
2020-10-07 19:11 ` Trond Myklebust
2020-10-07 20:29 ` bfields
2020-10-07 18:04 ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-10-07 18:19 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2020-10-07 16:50 ` Trond Myklebust
2021-01-19 22:22 ` bfields
2021-01-19 23:09 ` Trond Myklebust
2021-01-20 15:07 ` bfields
2021-05-03 20:09 ` bfields
2021-05-04 2:08 ` NeilBrown
2021-05-04 13:27 ` Tom Talpey
2021-05-04 14:27 ` Trond Myklebust
2021-05-04 16:51 ` bfields
2021-05-04 21:32 ` Daire Byrne
2021-05-04 21:48 ` Trond Myklebust
2021-05-05 12:53 ` Daire Byrne
2021-01-20 15:58 ` Chuck Lever
2020-10-07 13:56 ` Patrick Goetz
2020-10-07 16:28 ` Igor Ostrovsky
2020-10-07 16:30 ` Benjamin Coddington
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e6860bc5f72e3e0d1c4be9e577e83221aecd1a8.camel@hammerspace.com \
--to=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
--cc=aglo@umich.edu \
--cc=bcodding@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).