linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
To: "bcodding@redhat.com" <bcodding@redhat.com>
Cc: "bfields@fieldses.org" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"aglo@umich.edu" <aglo@umich.edu>,
	"chuck.lever@oracle.com" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: unsharing tcp connections from different NFS mounts
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 18:19:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e6860bc5f72e3e0d1c4be9e577e83221aecd1a8.camel@hammerspace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7755CA77-7ABB-438A-A6E1-C3A73A54B7B3@redhat.com>

On Wed, 2020-10-07 at 14:04 -0400, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
> On 7 Oct 2020, at 12:44, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > I did see Igor's claim that there is a QoS issue (which afaics
> > would
> > also affect NFSv3), but why do I care about QoS as a per-mountpoint
> > feature?
> 
> Because it's hard to do QoS without being able to classify the
> traffic on
> the network somehow.  The separate connection makes it a lot
> easier.  I see
> how that's - not our problem -, though.
> 
> The regular admin might find it surprising to tell their system to
> connect to a specific IP address at mount time, and it instead sends
> the
> mount's traffic elsewhere.
>
> Are you happy with the state of nconnect, or is there room for
> something
> more dynamic?
> 

I think there is room for improvement. We did say that we wanted to
eventually hand control over to a userspace policy daemon which should
be able to manage the number of connections based on demand and
networking conditions.
However as I already pointed out, NFSv4.1 also has congestion control
at the session level which may be playing a role here.

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com



  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-07 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-06 15:13 unsharing tcp connections from different NFS mounts J. Bruce Fields
2020-10-06 15:20 ` Chuck Lever
2020-10-06 15:22   ` Bruce Fields
2020-10-06 17:07     ` Tom Talpey
2020-10-06 19:30       ` Bruce Fields
     [not found]         ` <CAGrwUG5_KeRVR8chcA8=3FSeii2+4c8FbuE=CSGAtYVYqV4kLg@mail.gmail.com>
2020-10-07 14:08           ` Tom Talpey
2020-10-06 19:36 ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-10-06 21:46   ` Olga Kornievskaia
2020-10-07  0:18     ` J. Bruce Fields
2020-10-07 11:27       ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-10-07 12:55         ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-10-07 13:45           ` Chuck Lever
2020-10-07 14:05             ` Bruce Fields
2020-10-07 14:15               ` Chuck Lever
2020-10-07 16:05                 ` Bruce Fields
2020-10-07 16:44                   ` Trond Myklebust
2020-10-07 17:15                     ` Bruce Fields
2020-10-07 17:29                       ` Trond Myklebust
2020-10-07 18:05                         ` bfields
2020-10-07 19:11                           ` Trond Myklebust
2020-10-07 20:29                             ` bfields
2020-10-07 18:04                     ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-10-07 18:19                       ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2020-10-07 16:50                   ` Trond Myklebust
2021-01-19 22:22                     ` bfields
2021-01-19 23:09                       ` Trond Myklebust
2021-01-20 15:07                         ` bfields
2021-05-03 20:09                           ` bfields
2021-05-04  2:08                             ` NeilBrown
2021-05-04 13:27                               ` Tom Talpey
2021-05-04 14:27                               ` Trond Myklebust
2021-05-04 16:51                                 ` bfields
2021-05-04 21:32                                   ` Daire Byrne
2021-05-04 21:48                                     ` Trond Myklebust
2021-05-05 12:53                                       ` Daire Byrne
2021-01-20 15:58                       ` Chuck Lever
2020-10-07 13:56 ` Patrick Goetz
2020-10-07 16:28   ` Igor Ostrovsky
2020-10-07 16:30   ` Benjamin Coddington

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3e6860bc5f72e3e0d1c4be9e577e83221aecd1a8.camel@hammerspace.com \
    --to=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    --cc=aglo@umich.edu \
    --cc=bcodding@redhat.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).