From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Tom Yan <tom.ty89@gmail.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: 5.10 regression caused by: "uas: fix sdev->host->dma_dev": many XHCI swiotlb buffer is full / DMAR: Device bounce map failed errors on thunderbolt connected XHCI controller
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 17:19:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201127161900.GA10986@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8a52e868-0ca1-55b7-5ad2-ddb0cbb5e45d@redhat.com>
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 01:32:16PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> I ran some more tests, I can confirm that reverting:
>
> 5df7ef7d32fe "uas: bump hw_max_sectors to 2048 blocks for SS or faster drives"
> 558033c2828f "uas: fix sdev->host->dma_dev"
>
> Makes the problem go away while running a 5.10 kernel. I also tried doubling
> the swiotlb size by adding: swiotlb=65536 to the kernel commandline but that
> does not help.
>
> Some more observations:
>
> 1. The usb-storage driver does not cause this issue, even though it has a
> very similar change.
>
> 2. The problem does not happen until I plug an UAS decvice into the dock.
>
> 3. The problem continues to happen even after I unplug the UAS device and
> rmmod the uas module
>
> 3. made me take a bit closer look to the troublesome commit, it passes:
> udev->bus->sysdev, which I assume is the XHCI controller itself as device
> to scsi_add_host_with_dma, which in turn seems to cause permanent changes
> to the dma settings for the XHCI controller. I'm not all that familiar with
> the DMA APIs but I'm getting the feeling that passing the actual XHCI-controller's
> device as dma-device to scsi_add_host_with_dma is simply the wrong thing to
> do; and that the intended effects (honor XHCI dma limits, but do not cause
> any changes the XHCI dma settings) should be achieved differently.
>
> Note that if this is indeed wrong, the matching usb-storage change should
> likely also be dropped.
One problem in this area is that the clamping of the DMA size through
dma_max_mapping_size mentioned in the commit log doesn't work when
swiotlb is called from intel-iommu. I think we need to wire up those
calls there as well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-27 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-10 11:36 5.10 regression, many XHCI swiotlb buffer is full / DMAR: Device bounce map failed errors on thunderbolt connected XHCI controller Hans de Goede
2020-11-18 21:43 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-23 14:49 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-24 10:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-24 10:31 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-24 12:17 ` Mathias Nyman
2020-11-27 11:41 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-27 12:32 ` 5.10 regression caused by: "uas: fix sdev->host->dma_dev": " Hans de Goede
2020-11-27 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-11-27 18:12 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-28 1:25 ` Tom Yan
2020-11-28 10:43 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-28 15:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] uas: revert from scsi_add_host_with_dma() to scsi_add_host() Tom Yan
2020-11-28 15:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] usb-storage: " Tom Yan
2020-11-30 9:50 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-30 12:58 ` Tom Yan
2020-11-30 13:23 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-30 13:30 ` Greg KH
2020-11-30 13:36 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-30 13:53 ` Greg KH
2020-11-30 13:55 ` Hans de Goede
2020-12-04 15:02 ` Greg KH
2020-11-30 17:20 ` Alan Stern
2020-11-30 17:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-30 18:18 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-30 18:57 ` Tom Yan
2020-11-30 19:01 ` Tom Yan
2020-11-30 20:36 ` Alan Stern
2020-11-30 14:39 ` Tom Yan
2020-11-30 9:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] uas: " Hans de Goede
2020-11-30 19:30 ` Tom Yan
2020-12-01 11:09 ` Hans de Goede
2020-11-28 17:15 ` 5.10 regression caused by: "uas: fix sdev->host->dma_dev": many XHCI swiotlb buffer is full / DMAR: Device bounce map failed errors on thunderbolt connected XHCI controller Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-30 8:43 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201127161900.GA10986@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=tom.ty89@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).