linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel+linux-pci@molgen.mpg.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: okaya@codeaurora.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Subject: Re: pciehp 0000:00:1c.0:pcie004: Timeout on hotplug command 0x1038 (issued 65284 msec ago)
Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 11:35:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f60a69c1-865e-e919-48ce-92416e44879d@molgen.mpg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180504133327.GF15790@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>

Dear Bjorn,


Am 04.05.2018 um 15:33 schrieb Bjorn Helgaas:

[…]

> Yes, definitely.  I intended to do that but got a little lazy.  What
> do you think about the following?  Paul, if you haven't tested the
> first patch, can you try this one instead?  The logic is pretty much
> the same.
> 
> 3461a068661c ("PCI: pciehp: Wait for hotplug command completion
> lazily") mentions AMD and Nvidia devices with the same issue, but
> unfortunately doesn't include any specifics.
> 
> 
> commit b0d6f2230e12c85ae3b65a854a53c67c7c1f6406
> Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Date:   Thu May 3 18:39:38 2018 -0500
> 
>      PCI: pciehp: Add quirk for Intel Command Completed erratum
>      
>      The Intel CF118 erratum means the controller does not set the Command
>      Completed bit unless writes to the Slot Command register change "Control"
>      bits.  Command Completed is never set for writes that only change software
>      notification "Enable" bits.  This results in timeouts like this:
>      
>        pciehp 0000:00:1c.0:pcie004: Timeout on hotplug command 0x1038 (issued 65284 msec ago)
>      
>      When this erratum is present, avoid these timeouts by marking commands
>      "completed" immediately unless they change the "Control" bits.
>      
>      Here's the text of the erratum from the Intel document:
>      
>        CF118        PCIe Slot Status Register Command Completed bit not always
>                     updated on any configuration write to the Slot Control
>                     Register
>      
>        Problem:     For PCIe root ports (devices 0 - 10) supporting hot-plug,
>                     the Slot Status Register (offset AAh) Command Completed
>                     (bit[4]) status is updated under the following condition:
>                     IOH will set Command Completed bit after delivering the new
>                     commands written in the Slot Controller register (offset
>                     A8h) to VPP. The IOH detects new commands written in Slot
>                     Control register by checking the change of value for Power
>                     Controller Control (bit[10]), Power Indicator Control
>                     (bits[9:8]), Attention Indicator Control (bits[7:6]), or
>                     Electromechanical Interlock Control (bit[11]) fields. Any
>                     other configuration writes to the Slot Control register
>                     without changing the values of these fields will not cause
>                     Command Completed bit to be set.
>      
>                     The PCIe Base Specification Revision 2.0 or later describes
>                     the “Slot Control Register” in section 7.8.10, as follows
>                     (Reference section 7.8.10, Slot Control Register, Offset
>                     18h). In hot-plug capable Downstream Ports, a write to the
>                     Slot Control register must cause a hot-plug command to be
>                     generated (see Section 6.7.3.2 for details on hot-plug
>                     commands). A write to the Slot Control register in a
>                     Downstream Port that is not hotplug capable must not cause a
>                     hot-plug command to be executed.
>      
>                     The PCIe Spec intended that every write to the Slot Control
>                     Register is a command and expected a command complete status
>                     to abstract the VPP implementation specific nuances from the
>                     OS software. IOH PCIe Slot Control Register implementation
>                     is not fully conforming to the PCIe Specification in this
>                     respect.
>      
>        Implication: Software checking on the Command Completed status after
>                     writing to the Slot Control register may time out.
>      
>        Workaround:  Software can read the Slot Control register and compare the
>                     existing and new values to determine if it should check the
>                     Command Completed status after writing to the Slot Control
>                     register.
>      
>      Link: http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/xeon/xeon-e7-v2-spec-update.html
>      Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8770820b-85a0-172b-7230-3a44524e6c9f@molgen.mpg.de
>      Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel+linux-pci@molgen.mpg.de>
>      Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> index 18a42f8f5dc5..e70eba5ea906 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
>    * All rights reserved.
>    *
>    * Send feedback to <greg@kroah.com>,<kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
> - *
>    */
>   
>   #include <linux/kernel.h>
> @@ -147,25 +146,22 @@ static void pcie_wait_cmd(struct controller *ctrl)
>   	else
>   		rc = pcie_poll_cmd(ctrl, jiffies_to_msecs(timeout));
>   
> -	/*
> -	 * Controllers with errata like Intel CF118 don't generate
> -	 * completion notifications unless the power/indicator/interlock
> -	 * control bits are changed.  On such controllers, we'll emit this
> -	 * timeout message when we wait for completion of commands that
> -	 * don't change those bits, e.g., commands that merely enable
> -	 * interrupts.
> -	 */
>   	if (!rc)
>   		ctrl_info(ctrl, "Timeout on hotplug command %#06x (issued %u msec ago)\n",
>   			  ctrl->slot_ctrl,
>   			  jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - ctrl->cmd_started));
>   }
>   
> +#define CC_ERRATUM_MASK		(PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PCC |	\
> +				 PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC |	\
> +				 PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_AIC |	\
> +				 PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_EIC)
> +
>   static void pcie_do_write_cmd(struct controller *ctrl, u16 cmd,
>   			      u16 mask, bool wait)
>   {
>   	struct pci_dev *pdev = ctrl_dev(ctrl);
> -	u16 slot_ctrl;
> +	u16 slot_ctrl_orig, slot_ctrl;
>   
>   	mutex_lock(&ctrl->ctrl_lock);
>   
> @@ -180,6 +176,7 @@ static void pcie_do_write_cmd(struct controller *ctrl, u16 cmd,
>   		goto out;
>   	}
>   
> +	slot_ctrl_orig = slot_ctrl;
>   	slot_ctrl &= ~mask;
>   	slot_ctrl |= (cmd & mask);
>   	ctrl->cmd_busy = 1;
> @@ -188,6 +185,17 @@ static void pcie_do_write_cmd(struct controller *ctrl, u16 cmd,
>   	ctrl->cmd_started = jiffies;
>   	ctrl->slot_ctrl = slot_ctrl;
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * Controllers with the Intel CF118 and similar errata advertise
> +	 * Command Completed support, but they only set Command Completed
> +	 * if we change the "Control" bits for power, power indicator,
> +	 * attention indicator, or interlock.  If we only change the
> +	 * "Enable" bits, they never set the Command Completed bit.
> +	 */
> +	if (pdev->broken_cmd_compl &&
> +	    (slot_ctrl_orig & CC_ERRATUM_MASK) == (slot_ctrl & CC_ERRATUM_MASK))
> +		ctrl->cmd_busy = 0;
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * Optionally wait for the hardware to be ready for a new command,
>   	 * indicating completion of the above issued command.
> @@ -861,7 +869,7 @@ struct controller *pcie_init(struct pcie_device *dev)
>   		PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_MRLSC | PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_CC |
>   		PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_DLLSC);
>   
> -	ctrl_info(ctrl, "Slot #%d AttnBtn%c PwrCtrl%c MRL%c AttnInd%c PwrInd%c HotPlug%c Surprise%c Interlock%c NoCompl%c LLActRep%c\n",
> +	ctrl_info(ctrl, "Slot #%d AttnBtn%c PwrCtrl%c MRL%c AttnInd%c PwrInd%c HotPlug%c Surprise%c Interlock%c NoCompl%c LLActRep%c%s\n",
>   		(slot_cap & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_PSN) >> 19,
>   		FLAG(slot_cap, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_ABP),
>   		FLAG(slot_cap, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_PCP),
> @@ -872,7 +880,8 @@ struct controller *pcie_init(struct pcie_device *dev)
>   		FLAG(slot_cap, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPS),
>   		FLAG(slot_cap, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_EIP),
>   		FLAG(slot_cap, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_NCCS),
> -		FLAG(link_cap, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_DLLLARC));
> +		FLAG(link_cap, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_DLLLARC),
> +		pdev->broken_cmd_compl ? " (with Cmd Compl erratum)" : "");
>   
>   	if (pcie_init_slot(ctrl))
>   		goto abort_ctrl;
> @@ -891,3 +900,17 @@ void pciehp_release_ctrl(struct controller *ctrl)
>   	pcie_cleanup_slot(ctrl);
>   	kfree(ctrl);
>   }
> +
> +static void quirk_cmd_compl(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	u32 slot_cap;
> +
> +	if (pci_is_pcie(pdev)) {
> +		pcie_capability_read_dword(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP, &slot_cap);
> +		if (slot_cap & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPC &&
> +		    !(slot_cap & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_NCCS))
> +			pdev->broken_cmd_compl = 1;
> +	}
> +}
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_ANY_ID,
> +			      PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI, 8, quirk_cmd_compl);
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 73178a2fcee0..60cb5350ad28 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -406,6 +406,9 @@ struct pci_dev {
>   	struct bin_attribute *res_attr[DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE]; /* sysfs file for resources */
>   	struct bin_attribute *res_attr_wc[DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE]; /* sysfs file for WC mapping of resources */
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_PCIE
> +	unsigned int	broken_cmd_compl:1;	/* Command Complete broken */
> +#endif
>   #ifdef CONFIG_PCIE_PTM
>   	unsigned int	ptm_root:1;
>   	unsigned int	ptm_enabled:1;
> 

With this change, the message is also not shown anymore on the Lenovo 
X60. Thank you.

Tested-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>


Kind regards,

Paul

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-06  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-26 10:17 pciehp 0000:00:1c.0:pcie004: Timeout on hotplug command 0x1038 (issued 65284 msec ago) Paul Menzel
2018-04-27 19:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-27 19:34   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-27 21:12     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-28  0:56       ` Dave Young
2018-04-28  1:18         ` Dave Young
2018-04-28 13:03           ` okaya
2018-04-30 20:48             ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-30 21:17               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-04-30 21:27                 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-30 21:38                   ` Lukas Wunner
2018-05-01 12:38                   ` Sinan Kaya
2018-05-01 12:59                     ` Marc Zyngier
2018-05-01 13:25                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-05-01 16:31                         ` Marc Zyngier
2018-05-01 22:32                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-05-03  8:49   ` Paul Menzel
2018-05-04  2:45     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-05-04  6:37       ` okaya
2018-05-04 13:33         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-05-04 14:24           ` okaya
2018-05-06  9:35           ` Paul Menzel [this message]
2018-05-07 21:33           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-05-08  6:59             ` Paul Menzel
2018-05-08 12:34               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-05-08 13:22                 ` Paul Menzel
2018-05-09 11:41   ` Lukas Wunner
2018-05-09 12:57     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-05-09 13:16       ` Lukas Wunner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f60a69c1-865e-e919-48ce-92416e44879d@molgen.mpg.de \
    --to=pmenzel+linux-pci@molgen.mpg.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).