From: douglas.raillard@arm.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
quentin.perret@arm.com, douglas.raillard@arm.com,
patrick.bellasi@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/7] sched/cpufreq: Attach perf domain to sugov policy
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 18:42:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190508174301.4828-3-douglas.raillard@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190508174301.4828-1-douglas.raillard@arm.com>
From: Douglas RAILLARD <douglas.raillard@arm.com>
Attach an Energy Model perf_domain to each sugov_policy to prepare the
ground for energy-aware schedutil.
Signed-off-by: Douglas RAILLARD <douglas.raillard@arm.com>
---
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index d0f4d2111bfe..82dbacf83649 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ struct sugov_policy {
bool work_in_progress;
bool need_freq_update;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL
+ struct em_perf_domain *pd;
+#endif
};
struct sugov_cpu {
@@ -64,6 +68,38 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sugov_cpu, sugov_cpu);
/************************ Governor internals ***********************/
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL
+static void sugov_policy_attach_pd(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
+{
+ struct em_perf_domain *pd;
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy;
+
+ sg_policy->pd = NULL;
+ pd = em_cpu_get(policy->cpu);
+ if (!pd)
+ return;
+
+ if (cpumask_equal(policy->related_cpus, to_cpumask(pd->cpus)))
+ sg_policy->pd = pd;
+ else
+ pr_warn("%s: Not all CPUs in schedutil policy %u share the same perf domain, no perf domain for that policy will be registered\n",
+ __func__, policy->cpu);
+}
+
+static struct em_perf_domain *sugov_policy_get_pd(
+ struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
+{
+ return sg_policy->pd;
+}
+#else /* CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL */
+static void sugov_policy_attach_pd(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy) {}
+static struct em_perf_domain *sugov_policy_get_pd(
+ struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL */
+
static bool sugov_should_update_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time)
{
s64 delta_ns;
@@ -849,6 +885,9 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
sugov_update_shared :
sugov_update_single);
}
+
+ sugov_policy_attach_pd(sg_policy);
+
return 0;
}
--
2.21.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-08 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-08 17:42 [RFC PATCH 0/7] sched/cpufreq: Make schedutil energy aware douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:42 ` douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] PM: Introduce em_pd_get_higher_freq() douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:42 ` douglas.raillard
2019-05-16 12:42 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-16 12:42 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-16 13:01 ` Quentin Perret
2019-05-16 13:01 ` Quentin Perret
2019-05-16 13:22 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-16 13:22 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-19 16:08 ` Douglas Raillard
2019-06-20 13:04 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-21 10:17 ` Quentin Perret
2019-06-21 10:22 ` Quentin Perret
2019-05-16 13:06 ` Douglas Raillard
2019-05-16 13:06 ` Douglas Raillard
2019-05-08 17:42 ` douglas.raillard [this message]
2019-05-08 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] sched/cpufreq: Attach perf domain to sugov policy douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] sched/cpufreq: Hook em_pd_get_higher_power() into get_next_freq() douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:42 ` douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] sched/cpufreq: Move up sugov_cpu_is_busy() douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:42 ` douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:42 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] sched/cpufreq: sugov_cpu_is_busy for shared policy douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:42 ` douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] sched/cpufreq: Improve sugov_cpu_is_busy accuracy douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:43 ` douglas.raillard
2019-05-16 12:55 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-16 12:55 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-19 16:19 ` Douglas Raillard
2019-06-20 11:05 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-08 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] sched/cpufreq: Boost schedutil frequency ramp up douglas.raillard
2019-05-08 17:43 ` douglas.raillard
2019-05-13 7:12 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] sched/cpufreq: Make schedutil energy aware Viresh Kumar
2019-05-13 7:12 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-05-13 13:52 ` Douglas Raillard
2019-05-13 13:52 ` Douglas Raillard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190508174301.4828-3-douglas.raillard@arm.com \
--to=douglas.raillard@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).