* [PATCH 0/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Add dma-channel-mask property support @ 2019-08-28 11:13 Yoshihiro Shimoda 2019-08-28 11:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Don't set DMACHCLR bit 0 to 1 if iommu is mapped Yoshihiro Shimoda 2019-08-28 11:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Add dma-channel-mask property support Yoshihiro Shimoda 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Yoshihiro Shimoda @ 2019-08-28 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: vkoul; +Cc: dmaengine, linux-renesas-soc, Yoshihiro Shimoda This patch series is based on - renesas-drivers.git / renesas-drivers-2019-08-13-v5.3-rc4 tag - and the following patch series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/list/?series=165881 The commit e2d896c08ca3 ("Documentation: bindings: dma: Add binding for dma-channel-mask") adds the generic property and R-Car also has such use cases so that I made this patch series. Before adding the property support, I made a clean-up patch as the patch 1/2. Yoshihiro Shimoda (2): dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Don't set DMACHCLR bit 0 to 1 if iommu is mapped dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Add dma-channel-mask property support drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Don't set DMACHCLR bit 0 to 1 if iommu is mapped 2019-08-28 11:13 [PATCH 0/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Add dma-channel-mask property support Yoshihiro Shimoda @ 2019-08-28 11:13 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda 2019-08-31 8:49 ` Simon Horman ` (2 more replies) 2019-08-28 11:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Add dma-channel-mask property support Yoshihiro Shimoda 1 sibling, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Yoshihiro Shimoda @ 2019-08-28 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: vkoul; +Cc: dmaengine, linux-renesas-soc, Yoshihiro Shimoda The commit 20c169aceb45 ("dmaengine: rcar-dmac: clear pertinence number of channels") always set the DMACHCLR bit 0 to 1, but if iommu is mapped to the device, this driver doesn't need to clear it. So, this patch takes care of it by using "channels_mask" bitfield. Note that, this patch doesn't have a "Fixes:" tag because the driver doesn't manage the channel 0 anyway so that the behavior of the channel is not changed. Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> --- drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c b/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c index 779b715..204160e 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c +++ b/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ struct rcar_dmac_chan { * @iomem: remapped I/O memory base * @n_channels: number of available channels * @channels: array of DMAC channels + * @channels_mask: bitfield of which DMA channels are managed by this driver * @modules: bitmask of client modules in use */ struct rcar_dmac { @@ -202,6 +203,7 @@ struct rcar_dmac { unsigned int n_channels; struct rcar_dmac_chan *channels; + unsigned int channels_mask; DECLARE_BITMAP(modules, 256); }; @@ -446,7 +448,7 @@ static int rcar_dmac_init(struct rcar_dmac *dmac) u16 dmaor; /* Clear all channels and enable the DMAC globally. */ - rcar_dmac_write(dmac, RCAR_DMACHCLR, GENMASK(dmac->n_channels - 1, 0)); + rcar_dmac_write(dmac, RCAR_DMACHCLR, dmac->channels_mask); rcar_dmac_write(dmac, RCAR_DMAOR, RCAR_DMAOR_PRI_FIXED | RCAR_DMAOR_DME); @@ -822,6 +824,9 @@ static void rcar_dmac_stop_all_chan(struct rcar_dmac *dmac) for (i = 0; i < dmac->n_channels; ++i) { struct rcar_dmac_chan *chan = &dmac->channels[i]; + if (!(dmac->channels_mask & BIT(i))) + continue; + /* Stop and reinitialize the channel. */ spin_lock_irq(&chan->lock); rcar_dmac_chan_halt(chan); @@ -1801,6 +1806,8 @@ static int rcar_dmac_parse_of(struct device *dev, struct rcar_dmac *dmac) return -EINVAL; } + dmac->channels_mask = GENMASK(dmac->n_channels - 1, 0); + return 0; } @@ -1810,7 +1817,6 @@ static int rcar_dmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES | DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES | DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES | DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_16_BYTES | DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_32_BYTES | DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_64_BYTES; - unsigned int channels_offset = 0; struct dma_device *engine; struct rcar_dmac *dmac; const struct rcar_dmac_of_data *data; @@ -1843,10 +1849,8 @@ static int rcar_dmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) * level we can't disable it selectively, so ignore channel 0 for now if * the device is part of an IOMMU group. */ - if (device_iommu_mapped(&pdev->dev)) { - dmac->n_channels--; - channels_offset = 1; - } + if (device_iommu_mapped(&pdev->dev)) + dmac->channels_mask &= ~BIT(0); dmac->channels = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, dmac->n_channels, sizeof(*dmac->channels), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -1903,8 +1907,10 @@ static int rcar_dmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&engine->channels); for (i = 0; i < dmac->n_channels; ++i) { - ret = rcar_dmac_chan_probe(dmac, &dmac->channels[i], data, - i + channels_offset); + if (!(dmac->channels_mask & BIT(i))) + continue; + + ret = rcar_dmac_chan_probe(dmac, &dmac->channels[i], data, i); if (ret < 0) goto error; } -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Don't set DMACHCLR bit 0 to 1 if iommu is mapped 2019-08-28 11:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Don't set DMACHCLR bit 0 to 1 if iommu is mapped Yoshihiro Shimoda @ 2019-08-31 8:49 ` Simon Horman 2019-09-02 8:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2019-09-02 8:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2019-08-31 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yoshihiro Shimoda; +Cc: vkoul, dmaengine, linux-renesas-soc On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 08:13:54PM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > The commit 20c169aceb45 ("dmaengine: rcar-dmac: clear pertinence > number of channels") always set the DMACHCLR bit 0 to 1, but if > iommu is mapped to the device, this driver doesn't need to clear it. > So, this patch takes care of it by using "channels_mask" bitfield. > > Note that, this patch doesn't have a "Fixes:" tag because the driver > doesn't manage the channel 0 anyway so that the behavior of > the channel is not changed. > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Don't set DMACHCLR bit 0 to 1 if iommu is mapped 2019-08-28 11:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Don't set DMACHCLR bit 0 to 1 if iommu is mapped Yoshihiro Shimoda 2019-08-31 8:49 ` Simon Horman @ 2019-09-02 8:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2019-09-02 9:21 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda 2019-09-02 8:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2019-09-02 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yoshihiro Shimoda; +Cc: Vinod, dmaengine, Linux-Renesas Hi Shimoda-san, On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 1:15 PM Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> wrote: > The commit 20c169aceb45 ("dmaengine: rcar-dmac: clear pertinence > number of channels") always set the DMACHCLR bit 0 to 1, but if > iommu is mapped to the device, this driver doesn't need to clear it. > So, this patch takes care of it by using "channels_mask" bitfield. Thanks for your patch! > Note that, this patch doesn't have a "Fixes:" tag because the driver > doesn't manage the channel 0 anyway so that the behavior of > the channel is not changed. This patch does fix a bug, as GENMASK(dmac->n_channels - 1, 0) doesn't take into account channels_offset. Hence it not only clears channel 0, as you mentioned, but also forgets to clear the last channel, which is a real bug. So I think this does warrant a Fixes: 20c169aceb459575 ("dmaengine: rcar-dmac: clear pertinence number of channels") Or perhaps the actual bug should be fixed first in a separate patch? > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> > --- a/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c > @@ -446,7 +448,7 @@ static int rcar_dmac_init(struct rcar_dmac *dmac) > u16 dmaor; > > /* Clear all channels and enable the DMAC globally. */ > - rcar_dmac_write(dmac, RCAR_DMACHCLR, GENMASK(dmac->n_channels - 1, 0)); > + rcar_dmac_write(dmac, RCAR_DMACHCLR, dmac->channels_mask); > rcar_dmac_write(dmac, RCAR_DMAOR, > RCAR_DMAOR_PRI_FIXED | RCAR_DMAOR_DME); > > @@ -822,6 +824,9 @@ static void rcar_dmac_stop_all_chan(struct rcar_dmac *dmac) > for (i = 0; i < dmac->n_channels; ++i) { > struct rcar_dmac_chan *chan = &dmac->channels[i]; > > + if (!(dmac->channels_mask & BIT(i))) > + continue; > + > /* Stop and reinitialize the channel. */ > spin_lock_irq(&chan->lock); > rcar_dmac_chan_halt(chan); > @@ -1801,6 +1806,8 @@ static int rcar_dmac_parse_of(struct device *dev, struct rcar_dmac *dmac) > return -EINVAL; > } > > + dmac->channels_mask = GENMASK(dmac->n_channels - 1, 0); You're aware dmac->n_channels can be 99, as per the check above, jut out of context? ;-) Probably that check should be changed to reject >= 32, as the hardware and driver don't support more than 32 bits in CHCLR anyway. > + > return 0; > } > > @@ -1810,7 +1817,6 @@ static int rcar_dmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES | DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES | > DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES | DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_16_BYTES | > DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_32_BYTES | DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_64_BYTES; > - unsigned int channels_offset = 0; > struct dma_device *engine; > struct rcar_dmac *dmac; > const struct rcar_dmac_of_data *data; > @@ -1843,10 +1849,8 @@ static int rcar_dmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > * level we can't disable it selectively, so ignore channel 0 for now if > * the device is part of an IOMMU group. > */ > - if (device_iommu_mapped(&pdev->dev)) { > - dmac->n_channels--; > - channels_offset = 1; > - } > + if (device_iommu_mapped(&pdev->dev)) > + dmac->channels_mask &= ~BIT(0); > > dmac->channels = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, dmac->n_channels, > sizeof(*dmac->channels), GFP_KERNEL); Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Don't set DMACHCLR bit 0 to 1 if iommu is mapped 2019-09-02 8:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2019-09-02 9:21 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Yoshihiro Shimoda @ 2019-09-02 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: Vinod, dmaengine, Linux-Renesas Hi Geert-san, > From: Geert Uytterhoeven, Sent: Monday, September 2, 2019 5:36 PM > > Hi Shimoda-san, > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 1:15 PM Yoshihiro Shimoda > <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> wrote: > > The commit 20c169aceb45 ("dmaengine: rcar-dmac: clear pertinence > > number of channels") always set the DMACHCLR bit 0 to 1, but if > > iommu is mapped to the device, this driver doesn't need to clear it. > > So, this patch takes care of it by using "channels_mask" bitfield. > > Thanks for your patch! > > > Note that, this patch doesn't have a "Fixes:" tag because the driver > > doesn't manage the channel 0 anyway so that the behavior of > > the channel is not changed. > > This patch does fix a bug, as GENMASK(dmac->n_channels - 1, 0) doesn't > take into account channels_offset. Hence it not only clears channel 0, > as you mentioned, but also forgets to clear the last channel, which > is a real bug. Indeed. > So I think this does warrant a > Fixes: 20c169aceb459575 ("dmaengine: rcar-dmac: clear pertinence > number of channels") > > Or perhaps the actual bug should be fixed first in a separate patch? I think so. So, now I had already submitted two series like below, but I'll fix this at first. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/list/?series=165881 https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/list/?series=166457 > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> > > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Thank you for your review! > > --- a/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c > > +++ b/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c > > > @@ -446,7 +448,7 @@ static int rcar_dmac_init(struct rcar_dmac *dmac) > > u16 dmaor; > > > > /* Clear all channels and enable the DMAC globally. */ > > - rcar_dmac_write(dmac, RCAR_DMACHCLR, GENMASK(dmac->n_channels - 1, 0)); > > + rcar_dmac_write(dmac, RCAR_DMACHCLR, dmac->channels_mask); > > rcar_dmac_write(dmac, RCAR_DMAOR, > > RCAR_DMAOR_PRI_FIXED | RCAR_DMAOR_DME); > > > > @@ -822,6 +824,9 @@ static void rcar_dmac_stop_all_chan(struct rcar_dmac *dmac) > > for (i = 0; i < dmac->n_channels; ++i) { > > struct rcar_dmac_chan *chan = &dmac->channels[i]; > > > > + if (!(dmac->channels_mask & BIT(i))) > > + continue; > > + > > /* Stop and reinitialize the channel. */ > > spin_lock_irq(&chan->lock); > > rcar_dmac_chan_halt(chan); > > @@ -1801,6 +1806,8 @@ static int rcar_dmac_parse_of(struct device *dev, struct rcar_dmac *dmac) > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > > > + dmac->channels_mask = GENMASK(dmac->n_channels - 1, 0); > > You're aware dmac->n_channels can be 99, as per the check above, jut out of > context? ;-) > > Probably that check should be changed to reject >= 32, as the hardware > and driver don't support more than 32 bits in CHCLR anyway. I got it. So, I'll fix the rcar_dmac_parse_of() as one more a separate patch. Best regards, Yoshihiro Shimoda > > + > > return 0; > > } > > > > @@ -1810,7 +1817,6 @@ static int rcar_dmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES | DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES | > > DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES | DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_16_BYTES | > > DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_32_BYTES | DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_64_BYTES; > > - unsigned int channels_offset = 0; > > struct dma_device *engine; > > struct rcar_dmac *dmac; > > const struct rcar_dmac_of_data *data; > > @@ -1843,10 +1849,8 @@ static int rcar_dmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > * level we can't disable it selectively, so ignore channel 0 for now if > > * the device is part of an IOMMU group. > > */ > > - if (device_iommu_mapped(&pdev->dev)) { > > - dmac->n_channels--; > > - channels_offset = 1; > > - } > > + if (device_iommu_mapped(&pdev->dev)) > > + dmac->channels_mask &= ~BIT(0); > > > > dmac->channels = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, dmac->n_channels, > > sizeof(*dmac->channels), GFP_KERNEL); > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. > -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Don't set DMACHCLR bit 0 to 1 if iommu is mapped 2019-08-28 11:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Don't set DMACHCLR bit 0 to 1 if iommu is mapped Yoshihiro Shimoda 2019-08-31 8:49 ` Simon Horman 2019-09-02 8:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2019-09-02 8:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2019-09-02 9:25 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda 2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2019-09-02 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yoshihiro Shimoda; +Cc: Vinod, dmaengine, Linux-Renesas Hi Shimoda-san, On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 1:15 PM Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> wrote: > The commit 20c169aceb45 ("dmaengine: rcar-dmac: clear pertinence > number of channels") always set the DMACHCLR bit 0 to 1, but if > iommu is mapped to the device, this driver doesn't need to clear it. > So, this patch takes care of it by using "channels_mask" bitfield. > > Note that, this patch doesn't have a "Fixes:" tag because the driver > doesn't manage the channel 0 anyway so that the behavior of > the channel is not changed. > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> > --- > drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c b/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c > index 779b715..204160e 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c > @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ struct rcar_dmac_chan { > * @iomem: remapped I/O memory base > * @n_channels: number of available channels > * @channels: array of DMAC channels > + * @channels_mask: bitfield of which DMA channels are managed by this driver > * @modules: bitmask of client modules in use > */ > struct rcar_dmac { > @@ -202,6 +203,7 @@ struct rcar_dmac { > > unsigned int n_channels; > struct rcar_dmac_chan *channels; > + unsigned int channels_mask; Given you want to store the output of of_property_read_u32() here in a subsequent patch, you may want to use u32 instead of unsigned int. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Don't set DMACHCLR bit 0 to 1 if iommu is mapped 2019-09-02 8:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2019-09-02 9:25 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Yoshihiro Shimoda @ 2019-09-02 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: Vinod, dmaengine, Linux-Renesas Hi Geert-san, > From: Geert Uytterhoeven, Sent: Monday, September 2, 2019 5:52 PM <snip> > > @@ -202,6 +203,7 @@ struct rcar_dmac { > > > > unsigned int n_channels; > > struct rcar_dmac_chan *channels; > > + unsigned int channels_mask; > > Given you want to store the output of of_property_read_u32() here in a > subsequent patch, you may want to use u32 instead of unsigned int. I got it. I'll fix it. Best regards, Yoshihiro Shimoda ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Add dma-channel-mask property support 2019-08-28 11:13 [PATCH 0/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Add dma-channel-mask property support Yoshihiro Shimoda 2019-08-28 11:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Don't set DMACHCLR bit 0 to 1 if iommu is mapped Yoshihiro Shimoda @ 2019-08-28 11:13 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda 2019-08-31 8:50 ` Simon Horman 2019-09-02 8:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 1 sibling, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Yoshihiro Shimoda @ 2019-08-28 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: vkoul; +Cc: dmaengine, linux-renesas-soc, Yoshihiro Shimoda This patch adds dma-channel-mask property support not to reserve some DMA channels for some reasons. (for example: a heterogeneous CPU uses it.) Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> --- drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c | 12 +++++++++++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c b/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c index 204160e..bae0fe8 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c +++ b/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c @@ -1806,7 +1806,17 @@ static int rcar_dmac_parse_of(struct device *dev, struct rcar_dmac *dmac) return -EINVAL; } - dmac->channels_mask = GENMASK(dmac->n_channels - 1, 0); + /* + * If the driver is unable to read dma-channel-mask property, + * the driver assumes that it can use all channels. + */ + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "dma-channel-mask", + &dmac->channels_mask); + if (ret < 0) + dmac->channels_mask = GENMASK(dmac->n_channels - 1, 0); + + /* If the property has out-of-channel mask, this driver clears it */ + dmac->channels_mask &= GENMASK(dmac->n_channels - 1, 0); return 0; } -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Add dma-channel-mask property support 2019-08-28 11:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Add dma-channel-mask property support Yoshihiro Shimoda @ 2019-08-31 8:50 ` Simon Horman 2019-09-02 8:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2019-08-31 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yoshihiro Shimoda; +Cc: vkoul, dmaengine, linux-renesas-soc On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 08:13:55PM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > This patch adds dma-channel-mask property support not to reserve > some DMA channels for some reasons. (for example: a heterogeneous > CPU uses it.) > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Add dma-channel-mask property support 2019-08-28 11:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Add dma-channel-mask property support Yoshihiro Shimoda 2019-08-31 8:50 ` Simon Horman @ 2019-09-02 8:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2019-09-02 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yoshihiro Shimoda; +Cc: Vinod, dmaengine, Linux-Renesas Hi Shimoda-san, On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 1:15 PM Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> wrote: > This patch adds dma-channel-mask property support not to reserve > some DMA channels for some reasons. (for example: a heterogeneous > CPU uses it.) Thanks for your patch! > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> One suggestion below. > --- a/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c > @@ -1806,7 +1806,17 @@ static int rcar_dmac_parse_of(struct device *dev, struct rcar_dmac *dmac) > return -EINVAL; > } > > - dmac->channels_mask = GENMASK(dmac->n_channels - 1, 0); > + /* > + * If the driver is unable to read dma-channel-mask property, > + * the driver assumes that it can use all channels. > + */ > + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "dma-channel-mask", > + &dmac->channels_mask); > + if (ret < 0) > + dmac->channels_mask = GENMASK(dmac->n_channels - 1, 0); You could keep the preinitialization, and just ignore the return value: dmac->channels_mask = GENMASK(dmac->n_channels - 1, 0); of_property_read_u32(np, "dma-channel-mask", &dmac->channels_mask); > > + > + /* If the property has out-of-channel mask, this driver clears it */ > + dmac->channels_mask &= GENMASK(dmac->n_channels - 1, 0); > > return 0; > } Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-09-02 9:25 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-08-28 11:13 [PATCH 0/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Add dma-channel-mask property support Yoshihiro Shimoda 2019-08-28 11:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Don't set DMACHCLR bit 0 to 1 if iommu is mapped Yoshihiro Shimoda 2019-08-31 8:49 ` Simon Horman 2019-09-02 8:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2019-09-02 9:21 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda 2019-09-02 8:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2019-09-02 9:25 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda 2019-08-28 11:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] dmaengine: rcar-dmac: Add dma-channel-mask property support Yoshihiro Shimoda 2019-08-31 8:50 ` Simon Horman 2019-09-02 8:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).