* [PATCH 0/2] remove direct dependancy between irq and exynos @ 2019-12-07 13:00 Hyunki Koo 2019-12-07 13:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] irqchip: define EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER Hyunki Koo 2019-12-07 13:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: exynos: add select EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER Hyunki Koo 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Hyunki Koo @ 2019-12-07 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux, kgene, krzk, tglx, jason, maz Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel, kernel-team, Hyunki Koo From: Hyunki Koo <hyunki00.koo@samsung.com> This patch series is written to clean up dependancy of ARCH_EXYNOS Not all exynos device have IRQ_COMBINER, especially aarch64 EXYNOS but it is built for all exynos devices. Thus add the config for EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER remove direct between ARCH_EXYNOS and exynos-combiner.c and only selected on the aarch32 devices Hyunki Koo (2): irqchip: define EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER ARM: exynos: add select EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 7 +++++++ drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] irqchip: define EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER 2019-12-07 13:00 [PATCH 0/2] remove direct dependancy between irq and exynos Hyunki Koo @ 2019-12-07 13:00 ` Hyunki Koo 2019-12-07 13:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2019-12-07 13:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: exynos: add select EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER Hyunki Koo 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Hyunki Koo @ 2019-12-07 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux, kgene, krzk, tglx, jason, maz Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel, kernel-team, Hyunki Koo From: Hyunki Koo <hyunki00.koo@samsung.com> Not all exynos device have IRQ_COMBINER. Thus add the config for EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER. Signed-off-by: Hyunki Koo <hyunki00.koo@samsung.com> --- drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 7 +++++++ drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 2 +- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig index ba152954324b..3ed7b7f2ae26 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig @@ -499,4 +499,11 @@ config SIFIVE_PLIC If you don't know what to do here, say Y. +config EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER + bool "Samsung Exynos IRQ combiner support" + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS + help + Say yes here to add support for the IRQ combiner devices embedded + in Samsung Exynos chips. + endmenu diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile index e806dda690ea..60d7c7260fc3 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM2835) += irq-bcm2835.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM2835) += irq-bcm2836.o obj-$(CONFIG_DAVINCI_AINTC) += irq-davinci-aintc.o obj-$(CONFIG_DAVINCI_CP_INTC) += irq-davinci-cp-intc.o -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS) += exynos-combiner.o +obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER) += exynos-combiner.o obj-$(CONFIG_FARADAY_FTINTC010) += irq-ftintc010.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_HIP04) += irq-hip04.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_LPC32XX) += irq-lpc32xx.o -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] irqchip: define EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER 2019-12-07 13:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] irqchip: define EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER Hyunki Koo @ 2019-12-07 13:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2019-12-07 13:37 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2019-12-07 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hyunki Koo Cc: linux, kgene, tglx, jason, maz, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel, kernel-team, Hyunki Koo On Sat, Dec 07, 2019 at 10:00:48PM +0900, Hyunki Koo wrote: > From: Hyunki Koo <hyunki00.koo@samsung.com> > > Not all exynos device have IRQ_COMBINER. > Thus add the config for EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER. > > Signed-off-by: Hyunki Koo <hyunki00.koo@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 7 +++++++ > drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > Hi, There is no changelog and versioning of this patch so I do not understand how it differs with previous. It's a resend? v2? It brings the confusion and looks like you're ignoring previous comments. Looks the same and looks like breaking Exynos platforms in the same way. If you not want to skip combiner on ARMv8, it makes sense, then please follow the approach we did for Pinctrl drivers (PINCTRL_EXYNOS_ARM and PINCTRL_EXYNOS_ARM64). Best regards, Krzysztof > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig > index ba152954324b..3ed7b7f2ae26 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig > @@ -499,4 +499,11 @@ config SIFIVE_PLIC > > If you don't know what to do here, say Y. > > +config EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER > + bool "Samsung Exynos IRQ combiner support" > + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS > + help > + Say yes here to add support for the IRQ combiner devices embedded > + in Samsung Exynos chips. > + > endmenu > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile > index e806dda690ea..60d7c7260fc3 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM2835) += irq-bcm2835.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM2835) += irq-bcm2836.o > obj-$(CONFIG_DAVINCI_AINTC) += irq-davinci-aintc.o > obj-$(CONFIG_DAVINCI_CP_INTC) += irq-davinci-cp-intc.o > -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS) += exynos-combiner.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER) += exynos-combiner.o > obj-$(CONFIG_FARADAY_FTINTC010) += irq-ftintc010.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_HIP04) += irq-hip04.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_LPC32XX) += irq-lpc32xx.o > -- > 2.17.1 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] irqchip: define EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER 2019-12-07 13:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2019-12-07 13:37 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2019-12-07 22:24 ` Hyunki Koo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2019-12-07 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hyunki Koo Cc: linux, kgene, tglx, jason, maz, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel, kernel-team, Hyunki Koo On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 at 14:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 07, 2019 at 10:00:48PM +0900, Hyunki Koo wrote: > > From: Hyunki Koo <hyunki00.koo@samsung.com> > > > > Not all exynos device have IRQ_COMBINER. > > Thus add the config for EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hyunki Koo <hyunki00.koo@samsung.com> > > --- > > drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 7 +++++++ > > drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > Hi, > > There is no changelog and versioning of this patch so I do not > understand how it differs with previous. It's a resend? v2? It brings > the confusion and looks like you're ignoring previous comments. > > Looks the same and looks like breaking Exynos platforms in the same way. > > If you not want to skip combiner on ARMv8, it makes sense, then please > follow the approach we did for Pinctrl drivers (PINCTRL_EXYNOS_ARM and > PINCTRL_EXYNOS_ARM64). > > Best regards, > Krzysztof Ah, now I see the second patch. Still you break bisect which requires specific ordering of patches or squashing them into one. Optionally this could be default=y if ARCH_EXYNOS && ARM. I prefer just squashing both into one patch in this case. > > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig > > index ba152954324b..3ed7b7f2ae26 100644 > > --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig > > @@ -499,4 +499,11 @@ config SIFIVE_PLIC > > > > If you don't know what to do here, say Y. > > > > +config EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER > > + bool "Samsung Exynos IRQ combiner support" Now point it to be visible. Only for COMPILE_TEST > > + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS Since you make it a separate option, make it COMPILE_TEST. Best regards, Krzysztof > > + help > > + Say yes here to add support for the IRQ combiner devices embedded > > + in Samsung Exynos chips. > > + > > endmenu > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile > > index e806dda690ea..60d7c7260fc3 100644 > > --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile > > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile > > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM2835) += irq-bcm2835.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM2835) += irq-bcm2836.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_DAVINCI_AINTC) += irq-davinci-aintc.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_DAVINCI_CP_INTC) += irq-davinci-cp-intc.o > > -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS) += exynos-combiner.o > > +obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER) += exynos-combiner.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_FARADAY_FTINTC010) += irq-ftintc010.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_HIP04) += irq-hip04.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_LPC32XX) += irq-lpc32xx.o > > -- > > 2.17.1 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] irqchip: define EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER 2019-12-07 13:37 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2019-12-07 22:24 ` Hyunki Koo 2019-12-09 8:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Hyunki Koo @ 2019-12-07 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: linux, kgene, tglx, jason, maz, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel, kernel-team, Hyunki Koo On 19. 12. 7. 오후 10:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 at 14:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 07, 2019 at 10:00:48PM +0900, Hyunki Koo wrote: >>> From: Hyunki Koo <hyunki00.koo@samsung.com> >>> >>> Not all exynos device have IRQ_COMBINER. >>> Thus add the config for EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Hyunki Koo <hyunki00.koo@samsung.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 7 +++++++ >>> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 2 +- >>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >> Hi, >> >> There is no changelog and versioning of this patch so I do not >> understand how it differs with previous. It's a resend? v2? It brings >> the confusion and looks like you're ignoring previous comments. >> >> Looks the same and looks like breaking Exynos platforms in the same way. >> >> If you not want to skip combiner on ARMv8, it makes sense, then please >> follow the approach we did for Pinctrl drivers (PINCTRL_EXYNOS_ARM and >> PINCTRL_EXYNOS_ARM64). >> >> Best regards, >> Krzysztof > Ah, now I see the second patch. Still you break bisect which requires > specific ordering of patches or squashing them into one. Optionally > this could be default=y if ARCH_EXYNOS && ARM. I prefer just squashing > both into one patch in this case. you mean squashing two files arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig and arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig into one patch or squashing into only one file like blow? +config EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER + bool "Samsung Exynos IRQ combiner support" + depends on (ARCH_EXYNOS && ARM) || COMPILE_TEST + default y I prefer first one (squashing two files into one patch) > >>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig >>> index ba152954324b..3ed7b7f2ae26 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig >>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig >>> @@ -499,4 +499,11 @@ config SIFIVE_PLIC >>> >>> If you don't know what to do here, say Y. >>> >>> +config EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER >>> + bool "Samsung Exynos IRQ combiner support" > Now point it to be visible. Only for COMPILE_TEST > >>> + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS > Since you make it a separate option, make it COMPILE_TEST. Is this good ? +config EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER + bool "Samsung Exynos IRQ combiner support" + depends on (ARCH_EXYNOS && ARM) || COMPILE_TEST > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > >>> + help >>> + Say yes here to add support for the IRQ combiner devices embedded >>> + in Samsung Exynos chips. >>> + >>> endmenu >>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile >>> index e806dda690ea..60d7c7260fc3 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile >>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile >>> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM2835) += irq-bcm2835.o >>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM2835) += irq-bcm2836.o >>> obj-$(CONFIG_DAVINCI_AINTC) += irq-davinci-aintc.o >>> obj-$(CONFIG_DAVINCI_CP_INTC) += irq-davinci-cp-intc.o >>> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS) += exynos-combiner.o >>> +obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER) += exynos-combiner.o >>> obj-$(CONFIG_FARADAY_FTINTC010) += irq-ftintc010.o >>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_HIP04) += irq-hip04.o >>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_LPC32XX) += irq-lpc32xx.o >>> -- >>> 2.17.1 >>> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] irqchip: define EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER 2019-12-07 22:24 ` Hyunki Koo @ 2019-12-09 8:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2019-12-09 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hyunki Koo Cc: linux, kgene, tglx, jason, maz, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel, kernel-team, Hyunki Koo On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 07:24:49AM +0900, Hyunki Koo wrote: > > On 19. 12. 7. 오후 10:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 at 14:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 07, 2019 at 10:00:48PM +0900, Hyunki Koo wrote: > > > > From: Hyunki Koo <hyunki00.koo@samsung.com> > > > > > > > > Not all exynos device have IRQ_COMBINER. > > > > Thus add the config for EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hyunki Koo <hyunki00.koo@samsung.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 7 +++++++ > > > > drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 2 +- > > > > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > There is no changelog and versioning of this patch so I do not > > > understand how it differs with previous. It's a resend? v2? It brings > > > the confusion and looks like you're ignoring previous comments. > > > > > > Looks the same and looks like breaking Exynos platforms in the same way. > > > > > > If you not want to skip combiner on ARMv8, it makes sense, then please > > > follow the approach we did for Pinctrl drivers (PINCTRL_EXYNOS_ARM and > > > PINCTRL_EXYNOS_ARM64). > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Krzysztof > > Ah, now I see the second patch. Still you break bisect which requires > > specific ordering of patches or squashing them into one. Optionally > > this could be default=y if ARCH_EXYNOS && ARM. I prefer just squashing > > both into one patch in this case. > > you mean squashing two files arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig and > arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig into one patch > > or squashing into only one file like blow? > > +config EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER > + bool "Samsung Exynos IRQ combiner support" > + depends on (ARCH_EXYNOS && ARM) || COMPILE_TEST > + default y > > I prefer first one (squashing two files into one patch) Squashing two patches into one. > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig > > > > index ba152954324b..3ed7b7f2ae26 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig > > > > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig > > > > @@ -499,4 +499,11 @@ config SIFIVE_PLIC > > > > > > > > If you don't know what to do here, say Y. > > > > > > > > +config EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER > > > > + bool "Samsung Exynos IRQ combiner support" > > Now point it to be visible. Only for COMPILE_TEST Typo from my side. I wanted to say "No point" - this should not be selectable by user. > > > > > > + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS > > Since you make it a separate option, make it COMPILE_TEST. > > Is this good ? Not entirely. The bool should be also with "if COMPILE TEST" so: config EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER bool "Samsung Exynos IRQ combiner support" if COMPILE_TEST depends on (ARCH_EXYNOS && ARM) || COMPILE_TEST Best regards, Krzysztof ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ARM: exynos: add select EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER 2019-12-07 13:00 [PATCH 0/2] remove direct dependancy between irq and exynos Hyunki Koo 2019-12-07 13:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] irqchip: define EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER Hyunki Koo @ 2019-12-07 13:00 ` Hyunki Koo 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Hyunki Koo @ 2019-12-07 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux, kgene, krzk, tglx, jason, maz Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel, kernel-team, Hyunki Koo From: Hyunki Koo <hyunki00.koo@samsung.com> This patch add select EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER on aarch32 Exynos devices Signed-off-by: Hyunki Koo <hyunki00.koo@samsung.com> --- arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig index 4ef56571145b..c0efd544501e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ menuconfig ARCH_EXYNOS select EXYNOS_THERMAL select EXYNOS_PMU select EXYNOS_SROM + select EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER select EXYNOS_PM_DOMAINS if PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS select GPIOLIB select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER if ARCH_EXYNOS5 && VIRTUALIZATION -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-12-09 8:41 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-12-07 13:00 [PATCH 0/2] remove direct dependancy between irq and exynos Hyunki Koo 2019-12-07 13:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] irqchip: define EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER Hyunki Koo 2019-12-07 13:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2019-12-07 13:37 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2019-12-07 22:24 ` Hyunki Koo 2019-12-09 8:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2019-12-07 13:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: exynos: add select EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER Hyunki Koo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).