From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>, Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/8] exec: Convert security_bprm_set_creds into security_bprm_repopulate_creds
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 19:31:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o8qkzrxp.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877dx822er.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Mon, 18 May 2020 19:29:00 -0500")
Rename bprm->cap_elevated to bprm->active_secureexec and initialize it
in prepare_binprm instead of in cap_bprm_set_creds. Initializing
bprm->active_secureexec in prepare_binprm allows multiple
implementations of security_bprm_repopulate_creds to play nicely with
each other.
Rename security_bprm_set_creds to security_bprm_reopulate_creds to
emphasize that this path recomputes part of bprm->cred. This
recomputation avoids the time of check vs time of use problems that
are inherent in unix #! interpreters.
In short two renames and a move in the location of initializing
bprm->active_secureexec.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
fs/exec.c | 8 ++++----
include/linux/binfmts.h | 4 ++--
include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 2 +-
include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 4 ++--
include/linux/security.h | 8 ++++----
security/commoncap.c | 9 ++++-----
security/security.c | 4 ++--
7 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 9e70da47f8d9..8e3b93d51d31 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1366,7 +1366,7 @@ int begin_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm)
* the final state of setuid/setgid/fscaps can be merged into the
* secureexec flag.
*/
- bprm->secureexec |= bprm->cap_elevated;
+ bprm->secureexec |= bprm->active_secureexec;
if (bprm->secureexec) {
/* Make sure parent cannot signal privileged process. */
@@ -1634,10 +1634,10 @@ int prepare_binprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
int retval;
loff_t pos = 0;
+ /* Recompute parts of bprm->cred based on bprm->file */
+ bprm->active_secureexec = 0;
bprm_fill_uid(bprm);
-
- /* fill in binprm security blob */
- retval = security_bprm_set_creds(bprm);
+ retval = security_bprm_repopulate_creds(bprm);
if (retval)
return retval;
diff --git a/include/linux/binfmts.h b/include/linux/binfmts.h
index d1217fcdedea..8605ab4a0f89 100644
--- a/include/linux/binfmts.h
+++ b/include/linux/binfmts.h
@@ -27,10 +27,10 @@ struct linux_binprm {
unsigned long argmin; /* rlimit marker for copy_strings() */
unsigned int
/*
- * True if most recent call to cap_bprm_set_creds
+ * True if most recent call to security_bprm_set_creds
* resulted in elevated privileges.
*/
- cap_elevated:1,
+ active_secureexec:1,
/*
* Set by bprm_creds_for_exec hook to indicate a
* privilege-gaining exec has happened. Used to set
diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
index aab0695f41df..1e295ba12c0d 100644
--- a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
+++ b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ LSM_HOOK(int, 0, settime, const struct timespec64 *ts,
const struct timezone *tz)
LSM_HOOK(int, 0, vm_enough_memory, struct mm_struct *mm, long pages)
LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bprm_creds_for_exec, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
-LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bprm_set_creds, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
+LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bprm_repopulate_creds, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
LSM_HOOK(int, 0, bprm_check_security, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, bprm_committing_creds, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
LSM_HOOK(void, LSM_RET_VOID, bprm_committed_creds, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
index c719af37df20..d618ecc4d660 100644
--- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
+++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
* request libc enable secure mode.
* @bprm contains the linux_binprm structure.
* Return 0 if the hook is successful and permission is granted.
- * @bprm_set_creds:
+ * @bprm_repopulate_creds:
* Assuming that the relevant bits of @bprm->cred->security have been
* previously set, examine @bprm->file and regenerate them. This is
* so that the credentials derived from the interpreter the code is
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
* reopen script, and may end up opening something completely different.
* This hook may also optionally check permissions (e.g. for
* transitions between security domains).
- * The hook must set @bprm->cap_elevated to 1 if AT_SECURE should be set to
+ * The hook must set @bprm->active_secureexec to 1 if AT_SECURE should be set to
* request libc enable secure mode.
* @bprm contains the linux_binprm structure.
* Return 0 if the hook is successful and permission is granted.
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index 1bd7a6582775..d23f078eb589 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ extern int cap_capset(struct cred *new, const struct cred *old,
const kernel_cap_t *effective,
const kernel_cap_t *inheritable,
const kernel_cap_t *permitted);
-extern int cap_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm);
+extern int cap_bprm_repopulate_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm);
extern int cap_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name,
const void *value, size_t size, int flags);
extern int cap_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name);
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ int security_syslog(int type);
int security_settime64(const struct timespec64 *ts, const struct timezone *tz);
int security_vm_enough_memory_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, long pages);
int security_bprm_creds_for_exec(struct linux_binprm *bprm);
-int security_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm);
+int security_bprm_repopulate_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm);
int security_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm);
void security_bprm_committing_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm);
void security_bprm_committed_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm);
@@ -575,9 +575,9 @@ static inline int security_bprm_creds_for_exec(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
return 0;
}
-static inline int security_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
+static inline int security_bprm_repopulate_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
{
- return cap_bprm_set_creds(bprm);
+ return cap_bprm_repopluate_creds(bprm);
}
static inline int security_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
index f4ee0ae106b2..045b5b80ea40 100644
--- a/security/commoncap.c
+++ b/security/commoncap.c
@@ -797,14 +797,14 @@ static inline bool nonroot_raised_pE(struct cred *new, const struct cred *old,
}
/**
- * cap_bprm_set_creds - Set up the proposed credentials for execve().
+ * cap_bprm_repopulate_creds - Set up the proposed credentials for execve().
* @bprm: The execution parameters, including the proposed creds
*
* Set up the proposed credentials for a new execution context being
* constructed by execve(). The proposed creds in @bprm->cred is altered,
* which won't take effect immediately. Returns 0 if successful, -ve on error.
*/
-int cap_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
+int cap_bprm_repopulate_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
{
const struct cred *old = current_cred();
struct cred *new = bprm->cred;
@@ -884,12 +884,11 @@ int cap_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
return -EPERM;
/* Check for privilege-elevated exec. */
- bprm->cap_elevated = 0;
if (is_setid ||
(!__is_real(root_uid, new) &&
(effective ||
__cap_grew(permitted, ambient, new))))
- bprm->cap_elevated = 1;
+ bprm->active_secureexec = 1;
return 0;
}
@@ -1346,7 +1345,7 @@ static struct security_hook_list capability_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
LSM_HOOK_INIT(ptrace_traceme, cap_ptrace_traceme),
LSM_HOOK_INIT(capget, cap_capget),
LSM_HOOK_INIT(capset, cap_capset),
- LSM_HOOK_INIT(bprm_set_creds, cap_bprm_set_creds),
+ LSM_HOOK_INIT(bprm_repopulate_creds, cap_bprm_repopulate_creds),
LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_need_killpriv, cap_inode_need_killpriv),
LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_killpriv, cap_inode_killpriv),
LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_getsecurity, cap_inode_getsecurity),
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 4ee76a729f73..b890b7e2a765 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -828,9 +828,9 @@ int security_bprm_creds_for_exec(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
return call_int_hook(bprm_creds_for_exec, 0, bprm);
}
-int security_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
+int security_bprm_repopulate_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
{
- return call_int_hook(bprm_set_creds, 0, bprm);
+ return call_int_hook(bprm_repopulate_creds, 0, bprm);
}
int security_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
--
2.25.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-19 0:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <87h7wujhmz.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
[not found] ` <87sgga6ze4.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
2020-05-09 19:40 ` [PATCH 0/5] exec: Control flow simplifications Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-09 19:40 ` [PATCH 1/5] exec: Call cap_bprm_set_creds directly from prepare_binprm Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-09 20:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] exec: Directly call security_bprm_set_creds from __do_execve_file Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-09 20:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-09 20:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-09 20:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-11 3:15 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-11 16:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-11 21:18 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] exec: Remove recursion from search_binary_handler Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-09 20:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-10 4:22 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-05-10 19:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-11 14:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-11 19:10 ` Rob Landley
2020-05-13 21:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-14 18:46 ` Rob Landley
2020-05-11 21:55 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-12 18:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-12 19:25 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-12 20:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-12 23:08 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-12 23:47 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-12 23:51 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-14 14:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-14 16:56 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-05-14 17:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-13 0:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-13 2:39 ` Rob Landley
2020-05-13 19:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-14 16:49 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-09 19:42 ` [PATCH 4/5] exec: Allow load_misc_binary to call prepare_binfmt unconditionally Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-11 22:09 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-09 19:42 ` [PATCH 5/5] exec: Move the call of prepare_binprm into search_binary_handler Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-11 22:24 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-19 0:29 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] exec: Control flow simplifications Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-19 0:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] exec: Teach prepare_exec_creds how exec treats uids & gids Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-19 18:03 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-19 18:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-19 18:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-19 0:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] exec: Factor security_bprm_creds_for_exec out of security_bprm_set_creds Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-19 15:34 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-05-19 18:10 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-19 21:28 ` James Morris
2020-05-19 0:31 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2020-05-19 18:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] exec: Convert security_bprm_set_creds into security_bprm_repopulate_creds Kees Cook
2020-05-19 19:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-19 19:14 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-20 20:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-20 20:53 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-19 21:52 ` James Morris
2020-05-20 12:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-19 0:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] exec: Allow load_misc_binary to call prepare_binfmt unconditionally Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-19 18:27 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-19 19:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-19 19:17 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-19 0:32 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] exec: Move the call of prepare_binprm into search_binary_handler Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-19 18:27 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-19 21:30 ` James Morris
2020-05-19 0:33 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] exec/binfmt_script: Don't modify bprm->buf and then return -ENOEXEC Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-19 19:08 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-19 19:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-19 0:33 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] exec: Generic execfd support Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-19 19:46 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-19 19:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-19 20:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-19 21:59 ` Rob Landley
2020-05-20 16:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-21 22:50 ` Rob Landley
2020-05-22 3:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-22 4:51 ` Rob Landley
2020-05-22 13:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-19 0:34 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] exec: Remove recursion from search_binary_handler Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-19 20:37 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-19 1:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] exec: Control flow simplifications Linus Torvalds
2020-05-19 21:55 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-20 13:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-20 22:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-20 23:43 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-21 11:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-28 15:38 ` [PATCH 0/11] exec: cred calculation simplifications Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-28 15:41 ` [PATCH 01/11] exec: Reduce bprm->per_clear to a single bit Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-28 19:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-28 19:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-28 15:42 ` [PATCH 02/11] exec: Introduce active_per_clear the per file version of per_clear Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-28 19:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-28 15:42 ` [PATCH 03/11] exec: Compute file based creds only once Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-28 15:43 ` [PATCH 04/11] exec: Move uid/gid handling from creds_from_file into bprm_fill_uid Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-28 15:44 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-28 15:44 ` [PATCH 05/11] exec: In bprm_fill_uid use CAP_SETGID to see if a gid change is safe Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-28 15:48 ` [PATCH 06/11] exec: Don't set secureexec when the uid or gid changes are abandoned Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-28 15:48 ` [PATCH 07/11] exec: Set saved, fs, and effective ids together in bprm_fill_uid Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-28 15:49 ` [PATCH 08/11] exec: In bprm_fill_uid remove unnecessary no new privs check Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-28 15:49 ` [PATCH 09/11] exec: In bprm_fill_uid only set per_clear when honoring suid or sgid Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-28 19:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-28 19:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-28 15:50 ` [PATCH 10/11] exec: In bprm_fill_uid set secureexec at same time as per_clear Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-28 15:50 ` [PATCH 11/11] exec: Remove the label after_setid from bprm_fill_uid Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-29 16:45 ` [PATCH 0/2] exec: Remove the computation of bprm->cred Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-29 16:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] exec: Add a per bprm->file version of per_clear Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-29 21:06 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-30 3:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-30 5:14 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-29 16:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] exec: Compute file based creds only once Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-29 21:24 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-30 3:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2020-05-30 5:18 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o8qkzrxp.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=gerg@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).