linux-spi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>
To: <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>
Cc: <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com>, <broonie@kernel.org>,
	<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] spi: atmel-quadspi: add support for sam9x60 qspi controller
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 14:12:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190131141235.418e8e9c@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a91b6b2-0fed-f411-6e96-568e610f15fa@microchip.com>

On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 12:40:04 +0000
<Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com> wrote:

> On 01/31/2019 01:55 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 15:08:47 +0000
> > <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> +
> >> +static int atmel_sam9x60_qspi_set_cfg(struct atmel_qspi *aq,
> >> +				      const struct spi_mem_op *op,
> >> +				      struct atmel_qspi_cfg *cfg)
> >> +{
> >> +	int ret = atmel_qspi_set_mode(cfg, op);
> >> +
> >> +	if (ret)
> >> +		return ret;
> >> +
> >> +	cfg->icr = QSPI_ICR_INST(op->cmd.opcode);
> >> +
> >> +	if (!op->addr.nbytes) {
> >> +		cfg->ifr |= QSPI_IFR_TFRTYP_TRSFR_REG;
> >> +		if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_OUT)
> >> +			cfg->ifr |= QSPI_IFR_APBTFRTYP_WRITE;
> >> +		else
> >> +			cfg->ifr |= QSPI_IFR_APBTFRTYP_READ;
> >> +	} else {
> >> +		cfg->ifr |= QSPI_IFR_TFRTYP_TRSFR_MEM;  
> > 
> > Why do you use a MEM transfer here? What's the difference with a
> > regular transfer?  
> 
> QSPI_IFR_TFRTYP_TRSFR_MEM must be set when one wants to read/write in the serial
> memory, and particularly a memory data.
> 
> QSPI_IFR_TFRTYP_TRSFR_REG must be set when one wants to read or write to serial
> memory, but not a memory data.
> Read examples: JEDEC_ID or QSPI_SR
> Write examples: writing the configuration or the QSPI_SR.
> 
> Does this answers your question?

Not really :-). From the SPI bus perspective, there's no difference
between a read/write from/to actual memory blocks or a read/write
reg/param-page, so there must be something different on the controller
side. I think regular transfers should work for anything, which is why
I initially suggested to use that in the ->exec_op() implementation.
If memory accesses are optimized somehow and do not work for all
accesses, then we should keep them for the dirmap implementation.

After reading the sama5d2 datasheet, I have the feeling that the only
difference is the fact that the address is directly extracted from the
AHB window offset when using mem accesses (instead of being taken from
the IAR register), plus the possibility to enable the data
scrambler/randomize.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-31 13:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-30 15:08 [PATCH 0/9] spi: atmel-quadspi: introduce sam9x60 qspi contoller Tudor.Ambarus
2019-01-30 15:08 ` [PATCH 1/9] spi: atmel-quadspi: optimize qspi init Tudor.Ambarus
2019-01-30 17:15   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-01-31 10:42     ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-01-30 15:08 ` [PATCH 2/9] spi: atmel-quadspi: order header files inclusion alphabetically Tudor.Ambarus
2019-01-30 17:16   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-01-30 15:08 ` [PATCH 3/9] spi: atmel-quadspi: fix naming scheme Tudor.Ambarus
2019-01-30 17:19   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-01-31 10:43     ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-01-30 15:08 ` [PATCH 4/9] spi: atmel-quadspi: remove unnecessary cast Tudor.Ambarus
2019-01-30 17:20   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-01-30 15:08 ` [PATCH 5/9] spi: atmel-quadspi: return appropriate error code Tudor.Ambarus
2019-01-30 17:21   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-01-30 15:08 ` [PATCH 6/9] spi: atmel-quadspi: switch to SPDX license identifiers Tudor.Ambarus
2019-01-30 17:23   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-01-30 15:08 ` [PATCH 7/9] dt-bindings: spi: atmel-quadspi: update example to new clock binding Tudor.Ambarus
2019-01-30 17:25   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-01-30 15:08 ` [PATCH 8/9] dt-bindings: spi: atmel-quadspi: QuadSPI driver for Microchip SAM9X60 Tudor.Ambarus
2019-01-30 17:30   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-01-31 10:45     ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-01-30 15:08 ` [PATCH 9/9] spi: atmel-quadspi: add support for sam9x60 qspi controller Tudor.Ambarus
2019-01-30 17:43   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-01-31 10:46     ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-01-31 11:55   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-01-31 12:40     ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-01-31 13:12       ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2019-01-31 12:01   ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190131141235.418e8e9c@bbrezillon \
    --to=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
    --cc=Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com \
    --cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).