linux-sunxi.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Beranek <roman.beranek@prusa3d.cz>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Emil Lenngren <emil.lenngren@gmail.com>,
	Pascal Roeleven <dev@pascalroeleven.nl>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] pwm: sun4i: simplify calculation of the delay time
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 06:46:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210531044608.1006024-5-roman.beranek@prusa3d.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210531044608.1006024-1-roman.beranek@prusa3d.com>

There's no reason to expect a single jiffy has passed since writing
the CTRL register except if a preemption has occured in the meantime.
Avoid introducing unnecessary complexity and simply wait for the whole
period.

Signed-off-by: Roman Beranek <roman.beranek@prusa3d.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 17 ++---------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
index b3ec59a83d00..8218173ce3f6 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
-#include <linux/jiffies.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
@@ -89,7 +88,6 @@ struct sun4i_pwm_chip {
 	void __iomem *base;
 	struct mutex ctrl_lock;
 	const struct sun4i_pwm_data *data;
-	unsigned long next_period[2];
 };
 
 static inline struct sun4i_pwm_chip *to_sun4i_pwm_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip)
@@ -242,8 +240,7 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	struct pwm_state cstate;
 	u32 ctrl, duty = 0, period = 0, val;
 	int ret;
-	unsigned int delay_us, prescaler = 0;
-	unsigned long now;
+	unsigned int prescaler = 0;
 	bool bypass;
 
 	pwm_get_state(pwm, &cstate);
@@ -291,8 +288,6 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 
 	val = (duty & PWM_DTY_MASK) | PWM_PRD(period);
 	sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, val, PWM_CH_PRD(pwm->hwpwm));
-	sun4i_pwm->next_period[pwm->hwpwm] = jiffies +
-		nsecs_to_jiffies(cstate.period + 1000);
 
 	if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
 		ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_ACT_STATE, pwm->hwpwm);
@@ -314,15 +309,7 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	}
 
 	/* We need a full period to elapse before disabling the channel. */
-	now = jiffies;
-	if (time_before(now, sun4i_pwm->next_period[pwm->hwpwm])) {
-		delay_us = jiffies_to_usecs(sun4i_pwm->next_period[pwm->hwpwm] -
-					   now);
-		if ((delay_us / 500) > MAX_UDELAY_MS)
-			msleep(delay_us / 1000 + 1);
-		else
-			usleep_range(delay_us, delay_us * 2);
-	}
+	fsleep(cstate.period / NSEC_PER_USEC + 1);
 
 	ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_CLK_GATING, pwm->hwpwm);
 	sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, ctrl, PWM_CTRL_REG);
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-31  4:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-31  4:46 [PATCH 0/6] pwm: sun4i: only wait 2 cycles prior to disabling Roman Beranek
2021-05-31  4:46 ` [PATCH 1/6] pwm: sun4i: enable clk prior to getting its rate Roman Beranek
2021-06-07  8:00   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-05-31  4:46 ` [PATCH 2/6] pwm: sun4i: disable EN bit prior to the delay Roman Beranek
2021-06-07  8:07   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-05-31  4:46 ` [PATCH 3/6] pwm: sun4i: replace spinlock with a mutex Roman Beranek
2021-05-31  4:46 ` Roman Beranek [this message]
2021-05-31  4:46 ` [PATCH 5/6] pwm: sun4i: shorten the delay to 2 cycles Roman Beranek
2021-05-31  4:46 ` [PATCH 6/6] pwm: sun4i: don't delay if the PWM is already off Roman Beranek
2021-06-10 13:41   ` Pascal Roeleven
2021-05-31 19:07 ` [PATCH 0/6] pwm: sun4i: only wait 2 cycles prior to disabling Pascal Roeleven
2021-05-31 20:01   ` Emil Lenngren
2021-05-31 20:20     ` Pascal Roeleven
2021-06-08 12:28   ` Pascal Roeleven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210531044608.1006024-5-roman.beranek@prusa3d.com \
    --to=roman.beranek@prusa3d.cz \
    --cc=dev@pascalroeleven.nl \
    --cc=emil.lenngren@gmail.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 4/6] pwm: sun4i: simplify calculation of the delay time' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).