* watchdog ioctl inconsistencies
@ 2019-08-26 12:54 Rasmus Villemoes
2019-08-27 0:19 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rasmus Villemoes @ 2019-08-26 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-watchdog
Hi,
uapi/linux/watchdog.h has these
#define WDIOC_SETOPTIONS _IOR(WATCHDOG_IOCTL_BASE, 4, int)
This is a write from userspace perspective, so should have been _IOW.
#define WDIOC_KEEPALIVE _IOR(WATCHDOG_IOCTL_BASE, 5, int)
This one doesn't actually take an argument, so should just have been an
_IO - or if anything, an _IOW. One could be misled to think that if the
int argument has 'V' somewhere (perhaps first or last byte, depending on
endianness) that would count as a magic close.
#define WDIOC_SETTIMEOUT _IOWR(WATCHDOG_IOCTL_BASE, 6, int)
#define WDIOC_SETPRETIMEOUT _IOWR(WATCHDOG_IOCTL_BASE, 8, int)
The SETTIMEOUT handling does fall through to the GETTIMEOUT case, so
that one is indeed a "write this, but tell me what value actually took
effect". The SETPRETIMEOUT case ends with a break, so that one is really
_IOW.
There's not much to do about these, I think, but perhaps one could add a
comment to the uapi header containing the magic explains-all phrase
"historical reasons".
Does any static checker actually know about these conventions and peek
inside the _IO*() macros when used as an argument to ioctl(), comparing
the type and constness of the third argument to the direction/type
implied by the macro?
Rasmus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: watchdog ioctl inconsistencies
2019-08-26 12:54 watchdog ioctl inconsistencies Rasmus Villemoes
@ 2019-08-27 0:19 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2019-08-27 0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rasmus Villemoes, linux-watchdog
On 8/26/19 5:54 AM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> uapi/linux/watchdog.h has these
>
> #define WDIOC_SETOPTIONS _IOR(WATCHDOG_IOCTL_BASE, 4, int)
>
> This is a write from userspace perspective, so should have been _IOW.
>
> #define WDIOC_KEEPALIVE _IOR(WATCHDOG_IOCTL_BASE, 5, int)
>
> This one doesn't actually take an argument, so should just have been an
> _IO - or if anything, an _IOW. One could be misled to think that if the
> int argument has 'V' somewhere (perhaps first or last byte, depending on
> endianness) that would count as a magic close.
>
> #define WDIOC_SETTIMEOUT _IOWR(WATCHDOG_IOCTL_BASE, 6, int)
> #define WDIOC_SETPRETIMEOUT _IOWR(WATCHDOG_IOCTL_BASE, 8, int)
>
> The SETTIMEOUT handling does fall through to the GETTIMEOUT case, so
> that one is indeed a "write this, but tell me what value actually took
> effect". The SETPRETIMEOUT case ends with a break, so that one is really
> _IOW.
>
> There's not much to do about these, I think, but perhaps one could add a
> comment to the uapi header containing the magic explains-all phrase
> "historical reasons".
>
Those ioctls were imported into git when the git repository was created.
I don't think it is worth bothering about it now. I also don't think it
would add much if any value to add "historic reason" comments.
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-08-27 0:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-08-26 12:54 watchdog ioctl inconsistencies Rasmus Villemoes
2019-08-27 0:19 ` Guenter Roeck
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).