linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
To: "kevin@kevinlocke.name" <kevin@kevinlocke.name>
Cc: linuxwifi <linuxwifi@intel.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Coelho, Luciano" <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [linuxwifi] [RFC] iwlwifi: enable TX AMPDU for some iwldvm
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 04:58:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cdd094bd29f1e20dc5577fcbad6a7b404e66407a.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190312214445.GA20993@kevinolos>

On Tue, 2019-03-12 at 15:44 -0600, Kevin Locke wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-03-12 at 20:48 +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-03-12 at 14:31 -0600, Kevin Locke wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2019-03-12 at 19:47 +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
> > > > We had issues with reclaim path upon BACK. This is of course a
> > > > firmware problem...
> > > 
> > > Does that suggest the issue may have been fixed by a firmware
> > > update?
> > > For reference, I'm currently using "firmware version 9.221.4.1
> > > build
> > > 25532" from the firmware-iwlwifi Debian package (version
> > > 20190114-1).
> > > 
> > > If it would be helpful, I could attempt to bisect the firmware
> > > revisions to find the one that fixed it (assuming I can reproduce
> > > the
> > > issue with a previous firmware version).
> > 
> > Well.. Sorry, I wasn't very "technical".
> > So the problem was really that we stopped getting BACK
> > notifications
> > from the firmware and that caused a reclaim stall which in turn was
> > caught by a Tx queue stuck timer firing in the driver.
> > I was never able to reproduce this. What I can do is to enable A-
> > MPDU
> > on my old system that has this same device, just to see what
> > happens.
> 
> Thanks for the additional details and for offering to try it out,
> that
> would be great!

Just to align on expectations, I don't feel like enable A-MPDU by
default regardless of what will come out of this. People stopped
complaining after we disabled A-MPDU and the very very very few people
that did need more throughput knew how to enable them with the module
parameter. So, I don't plan to re-enable A-MPDU by default.

> 
> > While chasing this bug, I even found another one which bought me a
> > few
> > moments of fame:
> > 
> > commit d6ee27eb13beab94056e0de52d81220058ca2297
> > Author: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
> > Date:   Wed Jun 6 09:13:36 2012 +0200
> > 
> >     iwlwifi: don't mess up the SCD when removing a key
> > 
> > and in the commit message of that very commit:
> > 
> >     This doesn't seem to fix the higher queues that get stuck
> >     from time to time.
> > 
> > There were no new versions of the firmware released since then.
> > I tried to skim through bugzilla, but couldn't find the bugs I was
> > handling then.
> 
> Ah.  You are right about the firmware version.  I should have
> checked.
> 
> I see what you mean.  I found several reports for TX queue stuck
> issues in Bugzilla.  Perhaps this is one (or one of its many dups):
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56581
> 

And those were very very time consuming. I don't want to go there
again. These are very old devices (they were described as old in 2014
already...).

> Let me know if there is anything I can do to help search or test.
> 
> Thanks again,
> Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-13  4:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-12 17:12 [RFC] iwlwifi: enable TX AMPDU for some iwldvm Kevin Locke
2019-03-12 19:38 ` [linuxwifi] " Luciano Coelho
2019-03-12 19:47   ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2019-03-12 20:31     ` Kevin Locke
2019-03-12 20:48       ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2019-03-12 21:44         ` Kevin Locke
2019-03-13  4:58           ` Grumbach, Emmanuel [this message]
2019-03-13 15:06             ` Kevin Locke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cdd094bd29f1e20dc5577fcbad6a7b404e66407a.camel@intel.com \
    --to=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin@kevinlocke.name \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxwifi@intel.com \
    --cc=luciano.coelho@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).