linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 7/9] powerpc/powernv: Support EEH reset for VFs
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 13:03:19 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150511030319.GA12216@gwshan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430723258-21299-8-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 03:07:36PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>Before VF PE introduced, there isn't a method to reset an individual pci
             ^                                                        ^^^
             is                                                       PCI

>function. And since FW is not aware of the VF, the VF's reset should be
                     ^^
                    skiboot firmware

>done in kernel.
>
>This patch introduce a pnv_eeh_vf_pe_reset() to do the flr or af_flr to a
            ^^^^^^^^^  ^                                ^^^    ^^^^^^
            introduces function                         FLR    AF FLR
>VF.
>
>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h               |    1 +
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c |  111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
>index 2067de4..78c8bec 100644
>--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
>+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
>@@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ struct eeh_dev {
> 	int pcix_cap;			/* Saved PCIx capability	*/
> 	int pcie_cap;			/* Saved PCIe capability	*/
> 	int aer_cap;			/* Saved AER capability		*/
>+	int af_cap;			/* Saved AF capability		*/
> 	struct eeh_pe *pe;		/* Associated PE		*/
> 	struct list_head list;		/* Form link list in the PE	*/
> 	struct pci_controller *phb;	/* Associated PHB		*/
>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
>index 5447481..1ad322f 100644
>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
>@@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ static void *pnv_eeh_probe(struct pci_dn *pdn, void *data)
> 	edev->pcix_cap = pnv_eeh_find_cap(pdn, PCI_CAP_ID_PCIX);
> 	edev->pcie_cap = pnv_eeh_find_cap(pdn, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> 	edev->aer_cap  = pnv_eeh_find_ecap(pdn, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ERR);
>+	edev->af_cap   = pnv_eeh_find_cap(pdn, PCI_CAP_ID_AF);
> 	if ((edev->class_code >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI) {
> 		edev->mode |= EEH_DEV_BRIDGE;
> 		if (edev->pcie_cap) {
>@@ -891,6 +892,105 @@ static int pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int option)
> 	return 0;
> }
>
>+static int pnv_pci_wait_for_pending(struct pci_dn *pdn, int pos, u16 mask)
>+{
>+	int i;
>+
>+	/* Wait for Transaction Pending bit clean */
>+	for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
>+		u32 status;
>+		if (i)
>+			msleep((1 << (i - 1)) * 100);
>+
>+		eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, pos, 2, &status);
>+		if (!(status & mask))
>+			return 1;
>+	}
>+
>+	return 0;
>+}
>+
>+static int pnv_eeh_do_flr(struct pci_dn *pdn)
>+{
>+	u32 cap;
>+	struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
>+
>+	eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCAP, 4, &cap);
>+	if (!(cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_FLR))
>+		return -ENOTTY;
>+
>+	if (!pnv_pci_wait_for_pending(pdn, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVSTA, PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_TRPND))
>+		pr_err("%04x:%02x:%02x:%01x timed out waiting for pending transaction; performing function level reset anyway\n",
>+			edev->phb->global_number, pdn->busno,
>+			PCI_SLOT(pdn->devfn), PCI_FUNC(pdn->devfn));
>+

It's breaking the limitation that each line has 80 columns to maximal degree.

>+	eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, 4, &cap);
>+	cap |= PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_BCR_FLR;
>+	eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, 4, cap);
>+	msleep(100);
>+	return 0;
>+}
>+
>+static int pnv_eeh_do_af_flr(struct pci_dn *pdn)
>+{
>+	u32 cap;
>+	struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
>+
>+	if (!edev->af_cap)
>+		return -ENOTTY;
>+
>+	eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, edev->af_cap + PCI_AF_CAP, 1, &cap);
>+	if (!(cap & PCI_AF_CAP_TP) || !(cap & PCI_AF_CAP_FLR))
>+		return -ENOTTY;

Why not cache af_cap is it really support reset during probe time? With
that, you don't have the check.

>+
>+	/*
>+	 * Wait for Transaction Pending bit to clear.  A word-aligned test
>+	 * is used, so we use the conrol offset rather than status and shift
>+	 * the test bit to match.
>+	 */
>+	if (!pnv_pci_wait_for_pending(pdn, edev->af_cap + PCI_AF_CTRL,
>+				 PCI_AF_STATUS_TP << 8))
>+		pr_err("%04x:%02x:%02x:%01x timed out waiting for pending transaction; performing AF function level reset anyway\n",
>+			edev->phb->global_number, pdn->busno,
>+			PCI_SLOT(pdn->devfn), PCI_FUNC(pdn->devfn));
>+

It's breaking the limitation that each line has 80 columns.

>+	eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, edev->af_cap + PCI_AF_CTRL, 1, PCI_AF_CTRL_FLR);
>+	msleep(100);
>+	return 0;
>+}
>+

Can you merge the above two functions to one (pnv_eeh_do_vf_reset())? 

>+static int pnv_eeh_reset_vf(struct pci_dn *pdn)
>+{
>+	int rc;
>+
>+	might_sleep();
>+
>+	rc = pnv_eeh_do_flr(pdn);
>+	if (rc != -ENOTTY)
>+		goto done;
>+
>+	rc = pnv_eeh_do_af_flr(pdn);
>+	if (rc != -ENOTTY)
>+		goto done;
>+
>+done:
>+	return rc;
>+}
>+
>+static int pnv_eeh_vf_pe_reset(struct eeh_pe *pe, int option)
>+{
>+	struct eeh_dev *edev, *tmp;
>+	struct pci_dn *pdn;
>+	int ret = 0;
>+

Why you ignore "option" here? In that case, the PE will be resetted
for twice at asserting/deasserting time.

>+	eeh_pe_for_each_dev(pe, edev, tmp) {
>+		pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
>+		ret |= pnv_eeh_reset_vf(pdn);

When hitting error from reset on one VF, you don't need proceed, no?

>+	}
>+
>+	return ret;
>+}
>+
> void pnv_pci_reset_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> 	struct pci_controller *hose;
>@@ -966,7 +1066,9 @@ static int pnv_eeh_reset(struct eeh_pe *pe, int option)
> 		}
>
> 		bus = eeh_pe_bus_get(pe);
>-		if (pci_is_root_bus(bus) ||
>+		if (pe->type & EEH_PE_VF)
>+			ret = pnv_eeh_vf_pe_reset(pe, option);
>+		else if (pci_is_root_bus(bus) ||
> 			pci_is_root_bus(bus->parent))
> 			ret = pnv_eeh_root_reset(hose, option);
> 		else
>@@ -1106,6 +1208,13 @@ static inline bool pnv_eeh_cfg_blocked(struct pci_dn *pdn)
> 	if (!edev || !edev->pe)
> 		return false;
>
>+	/*
>+	 * For VF's reset operation, we need to rely on the kernel to
>+	 * do those pci read/write, since FW isn't aware of VFs.
              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

              PCI config operations since firmware isn't aware of VFs.

>+	 */
>+	if ((edev->mode & EEH_DEV_VF) && (edev->pe->state & EEH_PE_RESET))
>+		return true;
>+

Hrm, did you test the code? The PCI config is blocked when issuing reset
to VF PE. "false" should be returned here, isn't it?

> 	if (edev->pe->state & EEH_PE_CFG_BLOCKED)
> 		return true;
>

Thanks,
Gavin

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-11  3:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-04  7:07 [PATCH V3 0/9] VF EEH on Power8 Wei Yang
2015-05-04  7:07 ` [PATCH V3 1/9] pci/iov: rename and export virtfn_add/virtfn_remove Wei Yang
2015-05-11  2:13   ` Gavin Shan
2015-05-04  7:07 ` [PATCH V3 2/9] powerpc/pci_dn: cache vf_index in pci_dn Wei Yang
2015-05-11  2:21   ` Gavin Shan
2015-05-11  5:54     ` Wei Yang
2015-05-12  6:15       ` Gavin Shan
2015-05-12  7:29         ` Wei Yang
2015-05-04  7:07 ` [PATCH V3 3/9] powerpc/pci: remove PCI devices in reverse order Wei Yang
2015-05-04  7:07 ` [PATCH V3 4/9] powerpc/eeh: cache address range just for normal device Wei Yang
2015-05-04  7:07 ` [PATCH V3 5/9] powerpc/eeh: create EEH_PE_VF for VF PE Wei Yang
2015-05-11  2:37   ` Gavin Shan
2015-05-11  6:25     ` Wei Yang
2015-05-12  6:28       ` Gavin Shan
2015-05-12  7:52         ` Wei Yang
2015-05-04  7:07 ` [PATCH V3 6/9] powerpc/powernv: create/release eeh_dev for VF Wei Yang
2015-05-11  2:48   ` Gavin Shan
2015-05-12  8:06     ` Wei Yang
2015-05-12 23:09       ` Gavin Shan
2015-05-04  7:07 ` [PATCH V3 7/9] powerpc/powernv: Support EEH reset for VFs Wei Yang
2015-05-11  3:03   ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2015-05-04  7:07 ` [PATCH V3 8/9] powerpc/powernv: Support PCI config restore " Wei Yang
2015-05-11  4:22   ` Gavin Shan
2015-05-12  1:31     ` Wei Yang
2015-05-12  6:34       ` Gavin Shan
2015-05-12  8:16         ` Wei Yang
2015-05-12 23:16           ` Gavin Shan
2015-05-04  7:07 ` [PATCH V3 9/9] powerpc/eeh: handle VF PE properly Wei Yang
2015-05-13  1:16   ` Gavin Shan
2015-05-14  9:35     ` Wei Yang
2015-05-14 12:15       ` Gavin Shan
2015-05-14 10:02     ` Wei Yang
2015-05-14 12:30       ` Gavin Shan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150511030319.GA12216@gwshan \
    --to=gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).