From: Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com>
To: jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
gustavo@embeddedor.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, c.giuffrida@vu.nl,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
h.j.bos@vu.nl, jgg@ziepe.ca, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, dan.carpenter@oracle.com,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org,
arnd@arndb.de, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr,
v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
nathan@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com,
David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, christian.koenig@amd.com,
rppt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] treewide: remove using list iterator after loop body as a ptr
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 16:30:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220303083007.11640-1-xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A568BD90-FE81-4740-B1D3-C795EB636A5A@gmail.com>
> I think this would make sense, it would mean you only assign the containing
> element on valid elements.
>
> I was thinking something along the lines of:
>
> #define list_for_each_entry(pos, head, member) \
> for (struct list_head *list = head->next, typeof(pos) pos; \
> list == head ? 0 : (( pos = list_entry(pos, list, member), 1)); \
> list = list->next)
>
> Although the initialization block of the for loop is not valid C, I'm
> not sure there is any way to declare two variables of a different type
> in the initialization part of the loop.
It can be done using a *nested loop*, like this:
#define list_for_each_entry(pos, head, member) \
for (struct list_head *list = head->next, cond = (struct list_head *)-1; cond == (struct list_head *)-1; cond = NULL) \
for (typeof(pos) pos; \
list == head ? 0 : (( pos = list_entry(pos, list, member), 1)); \
list = list->next)
>
> I believe all this does is get rid of the &pos->member == (head) check
> to terminate the list.
Indeed, although the original way is harmless.
> It alone will not fix any of the other issues that using the iterator
> variable after the loop currently has.
Yes, but I stick with the list_for_each_entry_inside(pos, type, head, member)
way to make the iterator invisiable outside the loop (before and after the loop).
It is maintainable longer-term than "type(pos) pos" one and perfect.
see my explain:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220302093106.8402-1-xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com/
and list_for_each_entry_inside(pos, type, head, member) patch here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220301075839.4156-3-xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com/
--
Xiaomeng Tong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-03 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-28 11:08 [PATCH 0/6] Remove usage of list iterator past the loop body Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [PATCH 1/6] drivers: usb: remove " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:24 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 12:03 ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 13:18 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 18:20 ` Joe Perches
2022-03-01 5:52 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [PATCH 2/6] treewide: remove using list iterator after loop body as a ptr Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:20 ` Greg KH
2022-02-28 12:06 ` Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 17:37 ` Greg KH
2022-02-28 12:19 ` Christian König
2022-02-28 19:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:53 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-28 20:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-28 20:27 ` Johannes Berg
2022-02-28 20:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 23:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-03-01 0:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 0:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 18:14 ` Kees Cook
2022-03-01 18:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-03-01 3:03 ` David Laight
2022-02-28 21:47 ` Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 0:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 6:32 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-01 11:28 ` Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 17:36 ` Greg KH
2022-03-01 17:40 ` Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 17:58 ` Greg KH
2022-03-01 18:21 ` Kees Cook
2022-03-02 9:31 ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-02 14:04 ` David Laight
2022-03-03 2:27 ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03 4:58 ` David Laight
2022-03-03 7:26 ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03 9:30 ` David Laight
2022-03-03 12:37 ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03 12:18 ` [Kgdb-bugreport] " Daniel Thompson
2022-03-04 6:59 ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03 7:32 ` Jakob Koschel
2022-03-03 8:30 ` Xiaomeng Tong [this message]
2022-03-03 8:38 ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-02-28 20:07 ` Christian König
2022-02-28 20:42 ` James Bottomley
2022-02-28 20:56 ` Christian König
2022-02-28 21:13 ` James Bottomley
2022-03-01 7:03 ` Christian König
2022-02-28 22:05 ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 21:18 ` Jeffrey Walton
2022-02-28 21:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-02-28 22:28 ` James Bottomley
2022-02-28 22:50 ` Barnabás Pőcze
2022-03-01 0:30 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-03-01 0:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 22:58 ` David Laight
2022-03-01 23:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 23:19 ` David Laight
2022-03-01 23:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-02 9:29 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-03-02 20:07 ` Kees Cook
2022-03-02 20:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-02 20:59 ` Kees Cook
2022-03-03 8:37 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-03 10:56 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-01 2:15 ` David Laight
2022-02-28 13:13 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [PATCH 3/6] treewide: fix incorrect use to determine if list is empty Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:38 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [PATCH 4/6] drivers: remove unnecessary use of list iterator variable Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [PATCH 5/6] treewide: remove dereference of list iterator after loop body Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [PATCH 6/6] treewide: remove check of list iterator against head past the " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:22 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-02-28 13:12 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-01 20:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-02 17:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-03-07 15:00 ` [PATCH 0/6] Remove usage of list iterator " Dan Carpenter
2022-03-07 15:26 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220303083007.11640-1-xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com \
--to=xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com \
--cc=c.giuffrida@vu.nl \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=h.j.bos@vu.nl \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jakobkoschel@gmail.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).