archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <>
To: Bob_Tracy <>
Cc: Kai Germaschewski <>,
Subject: Re: 2.5.38: modular IDE broken
Date: 27 Sep 2002 23:41:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 21:37, Bob_Tracy wrote:
> Understood.  My position is simply that I noted something broken, and
> I reported it during the development cycle.  Would you prefer that I
> had waited until after 2.5.X became 2.6?  I didn't think so...  I was
> not (and am not) presuming to dictate what any developer's priorities
> should be.

Nod.. its just I've had lots of equally helpful reports 8)

      reply	other threads:[~2002-09-27 22:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-23 21:28 2.5.38: modular IDE broken Bob_Tracy
2002-09-23 22:51 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-09-24 14:13   ` Bob_Tracy
2002-09-24 16:30     ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-09-26 16:10     ` Alan Cox
2002-09-27 20:37       ` Bob_Tracy
2002-09-27 22:41         ` Alan Cox [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).