* -ac kernels
@ 2003-07-15 16:12 Ro0tSiEgE LKML
2003-07-15 17:28 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ro0tSiEgE LKML @ 2003-07-15 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
What patches in the -ac kernels get put into the mainstream kernel? For
instance, I would assume that fixes in 2.6.0-test1-ac1 would make it into
2.6.0-test2, but I'm not sure how that works, surely no one is just dropping
those fixes and not applying them at some point to the mainline kernels. So
I guess my question is, at what point does Linus' tree sync with Alan's?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: -ac kernels
2003-07-15 16:12 -ac kernels Ro0tSiEgE LKML
@ 2003-07-15 17:28 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-15 17:48 ` James Simmons
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2003-07-15 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ro0tSiEgE LKML; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Maw, 2003-07-15 at 17:12, Ro0tSiEgE LKML wrote:
> What patches in the -ac kernels get put into the mainstream kernel? For
> instance, I would assume that fixes in 2.6.0-test1-ac1 would make it into
> 2.6.0-test2, but I'm not sure how that works, surely no one is just dropping
> those fixes and not applying them at some point to the mainline kernels. So
> I guess my question is, at what point does Linus' tree sync with Alan's?
I'm trying to hoover up patches that make things work so it can get more
people testing more and more driver stuff so that when Linus is back I
can nuke his mailbox from orbit...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: -ac kernels
2003-07-15 17:28 ` Alan Cox
@ 2003-07-15 17:48 ` James Simmons
2003-07-15 17:50 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: James Simmons @ 2003-07-15 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: Ro0tSiEgE LKML, Linux Kernel Mailing List
> > What patches in the -ac kernels get put into the mainstream kernel? For
> > instance, I would assume that fixes in 2.6.0-test1-ac1 would make it into
> > 2.6.0-test2, but I'm not sure how that works, surely no one is just dropping
> > those fixes and not applying them at some point to the mainline kernels. So
> > I guess my question is, at what point does Linus' tree sync with Alan's?
>
> I'm trying to hoover up patches that make things work so it can get more
> people testing more and more driver stuff so that when Linus is back I
> can nuke his mailbox from orbit...
I will create a -ac patch in the next few days. Alot of important fixes.
Many more fixes to go tho.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: -ac kernels
2003-07-15 17:48 ` James Simmons
@ 2003-07-15 17:50 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2003-07-15 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Simmons; +Cc: Ro0tSiEgE LKML, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Maw, 2003-07-15 at 18:48, James Simmons wrote:
> I will create a -ac patch in the next few days. Alot of important fixes.
> Many more fixes to go tho.
Thanks. I'm not going to OLS so I should have a bit of time to generate these
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-15 17:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-15 16:12 -ac kernels Ro0tSiEgE LKML
2003-07-15 17:28 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-15 17:48 ` James Simmons
2003-07-15 17:50 ` Alan Cox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).