linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v6
@ 2011-10-13  0:46 Andi Kleen
  2011-10-13  0:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2011-10-13  0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: x86; +Cc: linux-kernel, Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

I got a request to make it easier to determine the microcode update level
on Intel CPUs. This patch adds a new "microcode" field to /proc/cpuinfo.

The microcode level is also outputed on fatal machine checks together
with the other CPUID model information.

I removed the respective code from the microcode update driver, it
just reads the field from cpu_data. Also when the microcode is updated
it fills in the new values too.

I had to add a memory barrier to native_cpuid to prevent it being
optimized away when the result is not used.

This turns out to clean up further code which already got this
information manually. This is done in followon patches.

v2:  Lots of updates based on feedback.
v3:  Rename cpu_update to microcode. Misc changes from feedback.
v4:  minor updates. rebased.
v5:  move MSR read to early_intel_init()
v6:  Use sync_core() instead of CPUID 1. Drop a white space change.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h  |    4 +++-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c       |    9 +++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c  |    9 +++++++--
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c        |    2 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c |   14 +++++---------
 5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
index 0d1171c..b650435 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ struct cpuinfo_x86 {
 	/* Index into per_cpu list: */
 	u16			cpu_index;
 #endif
+	u32			microcode;
 } __attribute__((__aligned__(SMP_CACHE_BYTES)));
 
 #define X86_VENDOR_INTEL	0
@@ -179,7 +180,8 @@ static inline void native_cpuid(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx,
 	      "=b" (*ebx),
 	      "=c" (*ecx),
 	      "=d" (*edx)
-	    : "0" (*eax), "2" (*ecx));
+	    : "0" (*eax), "2" (*ecx)
+	    : "memory");
 }
 
 static inline void load_cr3(pgd_t *pgdir)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index ed6086e..26627a3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -47,6 +47,15 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 		(c->x86 == 0x6 && c->x86_model >= 0x0e))
 		set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
 
+	if (c->x86 >= 6 && !cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_IA64)) {
+		unsigned lower_word;
+
+		wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
+		/* Required by the SDM */
+		sync_core();
+		rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, lower_word, c->microcode);
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Atom erratum AAE44/AAF40/AAG38/AAH41:
 	 *
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index 08363b0..8af6fa4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -217,8 +217,13 @@ static void print_mce(struct mce *m)
 		pr_cont("MISC %llx ", m->misc);
 
 	pr_cont("\n");
-	pr_emerg(HW_ERR "PROCESSOR %u:%x TIME %llu SOCKET %u APIC %x\n",
-		m->cpuvendor, m->cpuid, m->time, m->socketid, m->apicid);
+	/*
+	 * Note this output is parsed by external tools and old fields
+	 * should not be changed.
+	 */
+	pr_emerg(HW_ERR "PROCESSOR %u:%x TIME %llu SOCKET %u APIC %x microcode %u\n",
+		m->cpuvendor, m->cpuid, m->time, m->socketid, m->apicid,
+		cpu_data(m->extcpu).microcode);
 
 	/*
 	 * Print out human-readable details about the MCE error,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
index 62ac8cb..6254fda 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
@@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 		seq_printf(m, "stepping\t: %d\n", c->x86_mask);
 	else
 		seq_printf(m, "stepping\t: unknown\n");
+	if (c->microcode)
+		seq_printf(m, "microcode\t: %u\n", c->microcode);
 
 	if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TSC)) {
 		unsigned int freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c
index 1a1b606..3ca42d0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c
@@ -161,12 +161,7 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
 		csig->pf = 1 << ((val[1] >> 18) & 7);
 	}
 
-	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
-	/* see notes above for revision 1.07.  Apparent chip bug */
-	sync_core();
-	/* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
-	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, val[0], csig->rev);
-
+	csig->rev = c->microcode;
 	pr_info("CPU%d sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, revision=0x%x\n",
 		cpu_num, csig->sig, csig->pf, csig->rev);
 
@@ -299,9 +294,9 @@ static int apply_microcode(int cpu)
 	struct microcode_intel *mc_intel;
 	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci;
 	unsigned int val[2];
-	int cpu_num;
+	int cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
+	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu_num);
 
-	cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
 	uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
 	mc_intel = uci->mc;
 
@@ -317,7 +312,7 @@ static int apply_microcode(int cpu)
 	      (unsigned long) mc_intel->bits >> 16 >> 16);
 	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
 
-	/* see notes above for revision 1.07.  Apparent chip bug */
+	/* As documented in the SDM: Do a CPUID 1 here */
 	sync_core();
 
 	/* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
@@ -335,6 +330,7 @@ static int apply_microcode(int cpu)
 		(mc_intel->hdr.date >> 16) & 0xff);
 
 	uci->cpu_sig.rev = val[1];
+	c->microcode = val[1];
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.7.4.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check
  2011-10-13  0:46 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v6 Andi Kleen
@ 2011-10-13  0:46 ` Andi Kleen
  2011-10-13  5:38   ` H. Peter Anvin
  2011-10-13  0:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v3 Andi Kleen
  2011-10-13  5:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v6 H. Peter Anvin
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2011-10-13  0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: x86; +Cc: linux-kernel, Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Now that the cpu update level is available the Atom PSE errata
check can use it directly without reading the MSR again.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c |   15 ++++-----------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 26627a3..5231312 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -64,17 +64,10 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	 * need the microcode to have already been loaded... so if it is
 	 * not, recommend a BIOS update and disable large pages.
 	 */
-	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2) {
-		u32 ucode, junk;
-
-		wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
-		sync_core();
-		rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, junk, ucode);
-
-		if (ucode < 0x20e) {
-			printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
-			clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
-		}
+	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2 &&
+	    c->microcode < 0x20e) {
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
+		clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
 	}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-- 
1.7.4.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v3
  2011-10-13  0:46 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v6 Andi Kleen
  2011-10-13  0:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
@ 2011-10-13  0:46 ` Andi Kleen
  2011-10-13  5:38   ` H. Peter Anvin
  2011-10-13 16:11   ` Yu, Fenghua
  2011-10-13  5:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v6 H. Peter Anvin
  2 siblings, 2 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2011-10-13  0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: x86; +Cc: linux-kernel, Andi Kleen, jbeulich, fenghua.yu, khali

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Now that the ucode revision is available in cpu_data remove
the existing code in coretemp.c to query it manually. Read the ucode
revision from cpu_data instead

v2: Fix misplaced variable init. Remove unused variables.
v3: Port to latest tree
Cc: jbeulich@novell.com
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: khali@linux-fr.org
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c |   28 ++++------------------------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
index 9323837..ce18c04 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
@@ -325,15 +325,6 @@ static int get_tjmax(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 id, struct device *dev)
 	return adjust_tjmax(c, id, dev);
 }
 
-static void __devinit get_ucode_rev_on_cpu(void *edx)
-{
-	u32 eax;
-
-	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
-	sync_core();
-	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, eax, *(u32 *)edx);
-}
-
 static int create_name_attr(struct platform_data *pdata, struct device *dev)
 {
 	sysfs_attr_init(&pdata->name_attr.attr);
@@ -380,27 +371,16 @@ exit_free:
 static int __cpuinit chk_ucode_version(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
-	int err;
-	u32 edx;
 
 	/*
 	 * Check if we have problem with errata AE18 of Core processors:
 	 * Readings might stop update when processor visited too deep sleep,
 	 * fixed for stepping D0 (6EC).
 	 */
-	if (c->x86_model == 0xe && c->x86_mask < 0xc) {
-		/* check for microcode update */
-		err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, get_ucode_rev_on_cpu,
-					       &edx, 1);
-		if (err) {
-			pr_err("Cannot determine microcode revision of "
-			       "CPU#%u (%d)!\n", cpu, err);
-			return -ENODEV;
-		} else if (edx < 0x39) {
-			pr_err("Errata AE18 not fixed, update BIOS or "
-			       "microcode of the CPU!\n");
-			return -ENODEV;
-		}
+	if (c->x86_model == 0xe && c->x86_mask < 0xc && c->microcode < 0x39) {
+		pr_err("Errata AE18 not fixed, update BIOS or "
+		       "microcode of the CPU!\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.7.4.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v6
  2011-10-13  0:46 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v6 Andi Kleen
  2011-10-13  0:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
  2011-10-13  0:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v3 Andi Kleen
@ 2011-10-13  5:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
  2011-10-13 12:53   ` Andi Kleen
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2011-10-13  5:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: x86, linux-kernel, Andi Kleen

On 10/12/2011 05:46 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> I had to add a memory barrier to native_cpuid to prevent it being
> optimized away when the result is not used.
> 

This is BAD... this means gcc is optimizing away an asm volatile, which
should never happen.  Please report a gcc bug.  What version of gcc is this?

Other than that,

Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check
  2011-10-13  0:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
@ 2011-10-13  5:38   ` H. Peter Anvin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2011-10-13  5:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: x86, linux-kernel, Andi Kleen

On 10/12/2011 05:46 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Now that the cpu update level is available the Atom PSE errata
> check can use it directly without reading the MSR again.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v3
  2011-10-13  0:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v3 Andi Kleen
@ 2011-10-13  5:38   ` H. Peter Anvin
  2011-10-13 16:11   ` Yu, Fenghua
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2011-10-13  5:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: x86, linux-kernel, Andi Kleen, jbeulich, fenghua.yu, khali

On 10/12/2011 05:46 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Now that the ucode revision is available in cpu_data remove
> the existing code in coretemp.c to query it manually. Read the ucode
> revision from cpu_data instead
> 
> v2: Fix misplaced variable init. Remove unused variables.
> v3: Port to latest tree
> Cc: jbeulich@novell.com
> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com
> Cc: khali@linux-fr.org
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v6
  2011-10-13  5:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v6 H. Peter Anvin
@ 2011-10-13 12:53   ` Andi Kleen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2011-10-13 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: Andi Kleen, x86, linux-kernel, Andi Kleen



> Please report a gcc bug.  What version of gcc is
> this?

This was a Fedora 14 gcc 4.5 I believe.

-Andi



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v3
  2011-10-13  0:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v3 Andi Kleen
  2011-10-13  5:38   ` H. Peter Anvin
@ 2011-10-13 16:11   ` Yu, Fenghua
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Yu, Fenghua @ 2011-10-13 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen, x86
  Cc: linux-kernel, Andi Kleen, jbeulich, khali, Guenter Roeck, Jean Delvare

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andi Kleen [mailto:andi@firstfloor.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 5:47 PM
> To: x86@kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Andi Kleen; jbeulich@novell.com; Yu,
> Fenghua; khali@linux-fr.org
> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v3
> 
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Now that the ucode revision is available in cpu_data remove
> the existing code in coretemp.c to query it manually. Read the ucode
> revision from cpu_data instead
> 
> v2: Fix misplaced variable init. Remove unused variables.
> v3: Port to latest tree
> Cc: jbeulich@novell.com
> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com
> Cc: khali@linux-fr.org
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c |   28 ++++------------------------
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> index 9323837..ce18c04 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> @@ -325,15 +325,6 @@ static int get_tjmax(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 id,
> struct device *dev)
>  	return adjust_tjmax(c, id, dev);
>  }
> 
> -static void __devinit get_ucode_rev_on_cpu(void *edx)
> -{
> -	u32 eax;
> -
> -	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
> -	sync_core();
> -	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, eax, *(u32 *)edx);
> -}
> -
>  static int create_name_attr(struct platform_data *pdata, struct device
> *dev)
>  {
>  	sysfs_attr_init(&pdata->name_attr.attr);
> @@ -380,27 +371,16 @@ exit_free:
>  static int __cpuinit chk_ucode_version(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
>  	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
> -	int err;
> -	u32 edx;
> 
>  	/*
>  	 * Check if we have problem with errata AE18 of Core processors:
>  	 * Readings might stop update when processor visited too deep
> sleep,
>  	 * fixed for stepping D0 (6EC).
>  	 */
> -	if (c->x86_model == 0xe && c->x86_mask < 0xc) {
> -		/* check for microcode update */
> -		err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, get_ucode_rev_on_cpu,
> -					       &edx, 1);
> -		if (err) {
> -			pr_err("Cannot determine microcode revision of "
> -			       "CPU#%u (%d)!\n", cpu, err);
> -			return -ENODEV;
> -		} else if (edx < 0x39) {
> -			pr_err("Errata AE18 not fixed, update BIOS or "
> -			       "microcode of the CPU!\n");
> -			return -ENODEV;
> -		}
> +	if (c->x86_model == 0xe && c->x86_mask < 0xc && c->microcode <
> 0x39) {
> +		pr_err("Errata AE18 not fixed, update BIOS or "
> +		       "microcode of the CPU!\n");
> +		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> --
> 1.7.4.4

Acked-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check
  2011-10-13 22:55 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v7 Andi Kleen
@ 2011-10-13 22:55 ` Andi Kleen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2011-10-13 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: x86; +Cc: linux-kernel, Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Now that the cpu update level is available the Atom PSE errata
check can use it directly without reading the MSR again.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c |   15 ++++-----------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 26627a3..5231312 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -64,17 +64,10 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	 * need the microcode to have already been loaded... so if it is
 	 * not, recommend a BIOS update and disable large pages.
 	 */
-	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2) {
-		u32 ucode, junk;
-
-		wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
-		sync_core();
-		rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, junk, ucode);
-
-		if (ucode < 0x20e) {
-			printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
-			clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
-		}
+	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2 &&
+	    c->microcode < 0x20e) {
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
+		clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
 	}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-- 
1.7.4.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check
  2011-09-28 23:19 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v5 Andi Kleen
@ 2011-09-28 23:19 ` Andi Kleen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2011-09-28 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: hpa, mingo, tglx, Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Now that the cpu update level is available the Atom PSE errata
check can use it directly without reading the MSR again.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c |   15 ++++-----------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 6b178c8..aef3bfc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -64,17 +64,10 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	 * need the microcode to have already been loaded... so if it is
 	 * not, recommend a BIOS update and disable large pages.
 	 */
-	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2) {
-		u32 ucode, junk;
-
-		wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
-		sync_core();
-		rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, junk, ucode);
-
-		if (ucode < 0x20e) {
-			printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
-			clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
-		}
+	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2 &&
+	    c->microcode < 0x20e) {
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
+		clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
 	}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-- 
1.7.4.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check
  2011-08-29 23:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen
@ 2011-08-30  1:08   ` Yu, Fenghua
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Yu, Fenghua @ 2011-08-30  1:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen, linux-kernel; +Cc: x86, Andi Kleen, jbeulich, khali, Yu, Fenghua

>--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
>@@ -55,17 +55,10 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>        * need the microcode to have already been loaded... so if it is
>        * not, recommend a BIOS update and disable large pages.
 >      */
>-       if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2) {
>-               u32 ucode, junk;
>-
>-               wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
>-               sync_core();
>-               rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, junk, ucode);
>-
>-               if (ucode < 0x20e) {
>-                       printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
>-                       clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
>-               }
>+       if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2 &&
>+           c->microcode < 0x20e) {
>+               printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
>+               clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE); 
>       }

c->microcode is used here BEFORE it's initialized in init_intel() in your patch set [1/3].

Thanks.

-Fenghua

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check
  2011-08-29 23:47 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v4 Andi Kleen
@ 2011-08-29 23:47 ` Andi Kleen
  2011-08-29 23:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2011-08-29 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: x86, Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Now that the cpu update level is available the Atom PSE errata
check can use it directly without reading the MSR again.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c |   15 ++++-----------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 5c9670d..3f57854 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -55,17 +55,10 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	 * need the microcode to have already been loaded... so if it is
 	 * not, recommend a BIOS update and disable large pages.
 	 */
-	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2) {
-		u32 ucode, junk;
-
-		wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
-		sync_core();
-		rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, junk, ucode);
-
-		if (ucode < 0x20e) {
-			printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
-			clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
-		}
+	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2 &&
+	    c->microcode < 0x20e) {
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
+		clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
 	}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-- 
1.7.4.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check
  2011-07-06 23:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
@ 2011-07-11  8:19   ` Jean Delvare
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2011-07-11  8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: x86, linux-kernel, akpm, Andi Kleen

On Wed,  6 Jul 2011 16:57:02 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Now that the cpu update level is available the Atom PSE errata
> check can use it directly without reading the MSR again.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c |   15 ++++-----------
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> index ebedd27..6f75c45 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> @@ -55,17 +55,10 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  	 * need the microcode to have already been loaded... so if it is
>  	 * not, recommend a BIOS update and disable large pages.
>  	 */
> -	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2) {
> -		u32 ucode, junk;
> -
> -		wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
> -		sync_core();
> -		rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, junk, ucode);
> -
> -		if (ucode < 0x20e) {
> -			printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
> -			clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
> -		}
> +	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2 &&
> +	    c->microcode < 0x20e) {
> +		printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
> +		clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
>  	}
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64

Looks good.

Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>

-- 
Jean Delvare

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check
  2011-07-06 23:57 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3 Andi Kleen
@ 2011-07-06 23:57 ` Andi Kleen
  2011-07-11  8:19   ` Jean Delvare
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2011-07-06 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: x86; +Cc: linux-kernel, akpm, Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Now that the cpu update level is available the Atom PSE errata
check can use it directly without reading the MSR again.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c |   15 ++++-----------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index ebedd27..6f75c45 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -55,17 +55,10 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	 * need the microcode to have already been loaded... so if it is
 	 * not, recommend a BIOS update and disable large pages.
 	 */
-	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2) {
-		u32 ucode, junk;
-
-		wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
-		sync_core();
-		rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, junk, ucode);
-
-		if (ucode < 0x20e) {
-			printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
-			clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
-		}
+	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2 &&
+	    c->microcode < 0x20e) {
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
+		clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
 	}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-- 
1.7.4.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check
  2011-07-01 19:21 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3 Andi Kleen
@ 2011-07-01 19:21 ` Andi Kleen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2011-07-01 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: x86; +Cc: linux-kernel, Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Now that the cpu update level is available the Atom PSE errata
check can use it directly without reading the MSR again.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c |   15 ++++-----------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index ebedd27..6f75c45 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -55,17 +55,10 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	 * need the microcode to have already been loaded... so if it is
 	 * not, recommend a BIOS update and disable large pages.
 	 */
-	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2) {
-		u32 ucode, junk;
-
-		wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
-		sync_core();
-		rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, junk, ucode);
-
-		if (ucode < 0x20e) {
-			printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
-			clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
-		}
+	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2 &&
+	    c->microcode < 0x20e) {
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
+		clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
 	}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-- 
1.7.4.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check
  2011-05-25 19:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
@ 2011-05-26  7:39   ` Jean Delvare
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2011-05-26  7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: x86, linux-kernel, Andi Kleen

On Wed, 25 May 2011 12:32:27 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Now that the cpu update level is available the Atom PSE errata
> check can use it directly without reading the MSR again.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>

> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c |   15 ++++-----------
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> index ba5ba17..701efa4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> @@ -55,17 +55,10 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  	 * need the microcode to have already been loaded... so if it is
>  	 * not, recommend a BIOS update and disable large pages.
>  	 */
> -	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2) {
> -		u32 ucode, junk;
> -
> -		wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
> -		sync_core();
> -		rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, junk, ucode);
> -
> -		if (ucode < 0x20e) {
> -			printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
> -			clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
> -		}
> +	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2 &&
> +	    c->cpu_update < 0x20e) {
> +		printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
> +		clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
>  	}
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64


-- 
Jean Delvare

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check
  2011-05-25 19:32 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v2 Andi Kleen
@ 2011-05-25 19:32 ` Andi Kleen
  2011-05-26  7:39   ` Jean Delvare
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2011-05-25 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: x86; +Cc: linux-kernel, Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Now that the cpu update level is available the Atom PSE errata
check can use it directly without reading the MSR again.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c |   15 ++++-----------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index ba5ba17..701efa4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -55,17 +55,10 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	 * need the microcode to have already been loaded... so if it is
 	 * not, recommend a BIOS update and disable large pages.
 	 */
-	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2) {
-		u32 ucode, junk;
-
-		wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
-		sync_core();
-		rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, junk, ucode);
-
-		if (ucode < 0x20e) {
-			printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
-			clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
-		}
+	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2 &&
+	    c->cpu_update < 0x20e) {
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
+		clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
 	}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-- 
1.7.4.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check
  2011-05-24 23:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
@ 2011-05-25  6:59   ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2011-05-25  6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen
  Cc: x86, linux-kernel, Andi Kleen, Borislav Petkov, H. Peter Anvin,
	Thomas Gleixner


* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:

> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Now that the cpu update level is available the Atom PSE errata
> check can use it directly without reading the MSR again.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c |   15 ++++-----------

Ok, it's nice that you have split this one out.

Please also split out the MCE printk change you did in the first patch - even 
if it's a oneliner we want the first patch to only include changes focused to 
the primary purpose alone: the introduction of x86_cpu::microcode_version.

Also, please split the first patch into two other parts: a first one that 
factors out the Intel microcode-version MSR function into a separate function, 
and the second patch that introduces the x86_cpu::microcode_version field and 
fills it in in the CPU detection code and keeps it updated in the microcode 
driver.

Thanks,

	Ingo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check
  2011-05-24 23:03 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision Andi Kleen
@ 2011-05-24 23:03 ` Andi Kleen
  2011-05-25  6:59   ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2011-05-24 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: x86; +Cc: linux-kernel, Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Now that the cpu update level is available the Atom PSE errata
check can use it directly without reading the MSR again.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c |   15 ++++-----------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 150623a..9ae3782 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -55,17 +55,10 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	 * need the microcode to have already been loaded... so if it is
 	 * not, recommend a BIOS update and disable large pages.
 	 */
-	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2) {
-		u32 ucode, junk;
-
-		wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
-		sync_core();
-		rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, junk, ucode);
-
-		if (ucode < 0x20e) {
-			printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
-			clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
-		}
+	if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_mask <= 2 &&
+	    c->x86_cpu_update < 0x20e) {
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
+		clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
 	}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-- 
1.7.4.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-13 22:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-13  0:46 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v6 Andi Kleen
2011-10-13  0:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-10-13  5:38   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-13  0:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v3 Andi Kleen
2011-10-13  5:38   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-13 16:11   ` Yu, Fenghua
2011-10-13  5:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v6 H. Peter Anvin
2011-10-13 12:53   ` Andi Kleen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-13 22:55 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v7 Andi Kleen
2011-10-13 22:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-09-28 23:19 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v5 Andi Kleen
2011-09-28 23:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-08-29 23:47 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v4 Andi Kleen
2011-08-29 23:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-08-29 23:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen
2011-08-30  1:08   ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Yu, Fenghua
2011-07-06 23:57 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3 Andi Kleen
2011-07-06 23:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-07-11  8:19   ` Jean Delvare
2011-07-01 19:21 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3 Andi Kleen
2011-07-01 19:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-05-25 19:32 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v2 Andi Kleen
2011-05-25 19:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-05-26  7:39   ` Jean Delvare
2011-05-24 23:03 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision Andi Kleen
2011-05-24 23:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-05-25  6:59   ` Ingo Molnar

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).