From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] dmaengine: add a slave parameter to __dma_request_channel()
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:09:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1332157144.7180.7.camel@vkoul-udesk3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYiuERV08=UhBRnj2AjC_RxF+EY+zHAtEp6KYf2W10C_Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 11:16 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
> <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > Ok, let me try to summarise, what this would mean for sh-mobile:
> >
> > 1. this proposal introduces a new special case: with or without a mapping,
> > that will have to be handled in affected client and DMA controller
> > drivers. E.g., on sh-mobile some devices might on some systems use
> > channels from "general purpose" DMA controllers (no mapping), on other
> > systems it will be a dedicated controller (fixed mapping).
> >
> > 2. this will break, if we get more than 1 "general purpose" type with
> > different supported client sets. So, we develop a new API with a
> > pre-programmed limitation.
>
> I fail to see why this would not be solved by a one-to-many mapping?
>
> Flag for each device which channels it may use in a mapping
> table in platform data or device tree, I don't see the problem.
>
> You don't even have to specify that on a per-channel basis if
> you can come up with something more clever in the mapping
> table, such as "this device can use any channel on this DMAC,
> and channels 1-7 on that DMAC" - no problem?
Thats why added channel number to your proposal :)
>
> > 3. this will mean a substantial driver and platform code modification.
> > Nothing super-complex, but still some.
>
> Big deal. Refactoring is fun... ;-)
>
> > 4. we'll need a 3-stage channel allocation / configuration: request,
> > filter, config.
>
> In my world: channel request with *NO* filter function.
>
> Filter functions are part of the problem. So we refactor these
> away as part of this change. That's the whole point...
>
> The core gathers information from the platform and the
> DMAC driver(s) to build up the constraints necessary to
> hand out workling channels to each device that request
> one.
>
> And Russell IIRC already suggested a request-and-config
> channel inline for the simple cases, and if you still need to
> explicitly runtime-reconfigure then that's for a good
> reason.
>
> > Whereas with my configuration-parameter proposal it's just
> > one stage: allocate-and-configure.
>
> For one specific hardware, yes. For DMAengine at large
> and the majority of the drivers, no.
right, and that is my main concern.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-19 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-01 15:26 [PATCH/RFC] dmaengine: add a slave parameter to __dma_request_channel() Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-02 13:21 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-06 8:30 ` Vinod Koul
2012-03-06 8:53 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-06 12:08 ` Vinod Koul
2012-03-06 13:03 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-07 6:28 ` Vinod Koul
2012-03-07 9:18 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-07 9:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-07 9:55 ` Linus Walleij
2012-03-07 10:02 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-07 10:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-07 12:30 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-07 12:45 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-07 12:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-07 13:49 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-07 14:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-07 15:44 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-07 16:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-07 18:21 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-08 6:30 ` Vinod Koul
2012-03-08 10:16 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-08 10:55 ` Vinod Koul
2012-03-08 11:22 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-08 11:34 ` Vinod Koul
2012-03-08 12:58 ` Vinod Koul
2012-03-08 13:18 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-09 9:21 ` Vinod Koul
2012-03-09 9:24 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-09 9:39 ` Vinod Koul
2012-03-09 12:20 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-09 14:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-09 14:15 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-12 2:47 ` Vinod Koul
2012-03-12 19:47 ` Linus Walleij
2012-03-16 9:36 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-16 10:16 ` Linus Walleij
2012-03-16 10:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-16 11:09 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-16 14:11 ` Linus Walleij
2012-03-16 14:28 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-30 5:44 ` Linus Walleij
2012-03-30 6:40 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-30 10:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-03 20:36 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-03 20:44 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-12 21:33 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-04-12 23:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-30 10:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-30 10:40 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-30 10:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-19 11:58 ` Vinod Koul
2012-03-30 10:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-19 11:39 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2012-03-19 11:37 ` Vinod Koul
2012-03-19 11:47 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-19 13:34 ` Vinod Koul
2012-03-19 13:38 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-19 14:00 ` Vinod Koul
2012-03-19 14:09 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-19 14:22 ` Vinod Koul
2012-03-19 14:45 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-19 16:20 ` Vinod Koul
2012-03-19 16:32 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-20 7:11 ` Vinod Koul
2012-03-08 11:46 ` Linus Walleij
2012-03-08 12:36 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-07 16:31 ` Linus Walleij
2012-03-07 16:20 ` Linus Walleij
2012-03-07 9:46 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1332157144.7180.7.camel@vkoul-udesk3 \
--to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).