From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/13] workqueue: add lock_pool_queued_work()
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 02:41:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359657696-2767-10-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359657696-2767-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Extract lock code from try_to_grab_pending() and name it lock_pool_queued_work().
It makes the code better readability and make try_to_grab_pending() shorter,
And this new function can be reused by other(later patch).
Add/Use proper locking API.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 6e92f18..a108788 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -971,6 +971,45 @@ static struct worker_pool *lock_pool_executing_work(struct work_struct *work,
return NULL;
}
+/** lock_pool_queued_work - lock the pool a given work is queued on
+ * @work: work of interest
+ *
+ * CONTEXT:
+ * local_irq_disable()
+ *
+ * RETURNS:
+ * Pointer to work pool(and locked) on which @work is queued if found,
+ * NULL otherwise.
+ */
+static struct worker_pool *lock_pool_queued_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = get_work_cwq(work);
+ struct worker_pool *pool;
+
+ if (!cwq)
+ return NULL;
+
+ pool = cwq->pool;
+ spin_lock(&pool->lock);
+ /*
+ * The CWQ bit is set/cleared only when we do enqueue/dequeue the work
+ * When a work is enqueued(insert_work()) to a pool:
+ * we set cwq(CWQ bit) with pool->lock held
+ * when a work is dequeued(process_one_work(),try_to_grab_pending()):
+ * we clear cwq(CWQ bit) with pool->lock held
+ *
+ * So when if the pool->lock is held, we can determine:
+ * CWQ bit is set and the cwq->pool == pool
+ * <==> the work is queued on the pool
+ */
+ cwq = get_work_cwq(work);
+ if (cwq && cwq->pool == pool)
+ return pool;
+ spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
/**
* move_linked_works - move linked works to a list
* @work: start of series of works to be scheduled
@@ -1104,7 +1143,6 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork,
unsigned long *flags)
{
struct worker_pool *pool;
- struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq;
local_irq_save(*flags);
@@ -1129,49 +1167,29 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork,
* The queueing is in progress, or it is already queued. Try to
* steal it from ->worklist without clearing WORK_STRUCT_PENDING.
*/
- pool = get_work_pool(work);
- if (!pool)
- goto fail;
-
- spin_lock(&pool->lock);
- /*
- * The CWQ bit is set/cleared only when we do enqueue/dequeue the work
- * When a work is enqueued(insert_work()) to a pool:
- * we set cwq(CWQ bit) with pool->lock held
- * when a work is dequeued(process_one_work(),try_to_grab_pending()):
- * we clear cwq(CWQ bit) with pool->lock held
- *
- * So when if the pool->lock is held, we can determine:
- * CWQ bit is set and the cwq->pool == pool
- * <==> the work is queued on the pool
- */
- cwq = get_work_cwq(work);
- if (cwq) {
- if (pool == cwq->pool) {
- debug_work_deactivate(work);
+ pool = lock_pool_queued_work(work);
+ if (pool) {
+ debug_work_deactivate(work);
- /*
- * A delayed work item cannot be grabbed directly
- * because it might have linked NO_COLOR work items
- * which, if left on the delayed_list, will confuse
- * cwq->nr_active management later on and cause
- * stall. Make sure the work item is activated
- * before grabbing.
- */
- if (*work_data_bits(work) & WORK_STRUCT_DELAYED)
- cwq_activate_delayed_work(work);
+ /*
+ * A delayed work item cannot be grabbed directly
+ * because it might have linked NO_COLOR work items
+ * which, if left on the delayed_list, will confuse
+ * cwq->nr_active management later on and cause
+ * stall. Make sure the work item is activated
+ * before grabbing.
+ */
+ if (*work_data_bits(work) & WORK_STRUCT_DELAYED)
+ cwq_activate_delayed_work(work);
- list_del_init(&work->entry);
- cwq_dec_nr_in_flight(get_work_cwq(work),
- get_work_color(work));
+ list_del_init(&work->entry);
+ cwq_dec_nr_in_flight(get_work_cwq(work), get_work_color(work));
- clear_work_cwq(work, pool->id);
- spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
- return 1;
- }
+ clear_work_cwq(work, pool->id);
+ spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
+ return 1;
}
- spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
-fail:
+
local_irq_restore(*flags);
if (work_is_canceling(work))
return -ENOENT;
@@ -2821,7 +2839,7 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr)
return false;
spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
- /* See the comment near try_to_grab_pending() with the same code */
+ /* See the comment near lock_pool_queued_work() with the same code */
cwq = get_work_cwq(work);
if (cwq) {
if (unlikely(pool != cwq->pool))
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-31 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-31 18:41 [PATCH 00/13] workqueue: enhance locking and record global worker id for work data Lai Jiangshan
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 01/13] workqueue: remove WORK_CPU_NONE Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 19:49 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 12:03 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-06 22:34 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: replace WORK_CPU_NONE/LAST with WORK_CPU_END Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 02/13] workqueue: fix work_busy() Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 19:54 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 12:06 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-05 18:53 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-06 11:42 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-06 14:05 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-06 23:02 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: make work_busy() test WORK_STRUCT_PENDING first Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 03/13] workqueue: don't set work cwq until we queued it on pool Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:28 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 15:00 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-05 16:45 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-06 11:35 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-06 14:18 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 15:06 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 0:28 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9 workqueue]: add delayed_work->wq to simplify reentrancy handling Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 04/13] workqueue: clear cwq when cancel the work Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 0:53 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: make work->data point to pool after try_to_grab_pending() Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 05/13] workqueue: change queued detection and remove *mb()s Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 1:52 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: simplify is-work-item-queued-here test Tejun Heo
2013-02-07 2:03 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: cosmetic update in try_to_grab_pending() Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 06/13] workqueue: get pool id from work->data directly if it is offq Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 20:16 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: make get_work_pool_id() cheaper Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 07/13] workqueue: get pool from wq/cwq Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 21:13 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: pick cwq instead of pool in __queue_work() Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 08/13] workqueue: add lock_pool_executing_work() Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:34 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 12:15 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-05 19:09 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 10/13] workqueue: add lock_pool_own_work() and remove get_work_pool() Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:38 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 11/13] workqueue: allow more work_pool id space Lai Jiangshan
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 12/13] workqueue: add worker's global worker ID Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:39 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 13/13] workqueue: record global worker ID instead of pool ID in work->data when off-queue Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:40 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-04 22:12 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 15:18 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 22:02 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-13 22:23 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-04 21:04 ` [PATCH 00/13] workqueue: enhance locking and record global worker id for work data Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 16:19 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-05 16:50 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1359657696-2767-10-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).