From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/13] workqueue: add lock_pool_executing_work()
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 02:41:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359657696-2767-9-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359657696-2767-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Extract the lock code from __queue_work() and name it lock_pool_executing_work().
It makes the code better readability and make __queue_work() shorter,
And this new function can be reused by others(later patches).
Add/Use proper locking API.
This patch has a little bad side effect for __queue_work():
even worker_pool_by_id(pool_id) == get_cwq(cpu, wq)->pool,
It will still call find_worker_executing_work() unconditionally, but it is
it is a very small overhead compared to the lockings and worker_pool_by_id(),
and this overhead will be reduced later.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index a138844..6e92f18 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -934,6 +934,43 @@ static struct worker *find_worker_executing_work(struct worker_pool *pool,
return NULL;
}
+/** lock_pool_executing_work - lock the pool a given offq work is running on
+ * @work: work of interest
+ * @worker: return the worker which is executing @work if found
+ *
+ * CONTEXT:
+ * local_irq_disable()
+ *
+ * RETURNS:
+ * Pointer to work pool(and locked) on which @work is running if found,
+ * NULL otherwise.
+ */
+static struct worker_pool *lock_pool_executing_work(struct work_struct *work,
+ struct worker **worker)
+{
+ unsigned long pool_id = offq_work_pool_id(work);
+ struct worker_pool *pool;
+ struct worker *exec;
+
+ if (pool_id == WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE)
+ return NULL;
+
+ pool = worker_pool_by_id(pool_id);
+ if (!pool)
+ return NULL;
+
+ spin_lock(&pool->lock);
+ exec = find_worker_executing_work(pool, work);
+ if (exec) {
+ BUG_ON(pool != exec->pool);
+ *worker = exec;
+ return pool;
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
/**
* move_linked_works - move linked works to a list
* @work: start of series of works to be scheduled
@@ -1235,35 +1272,24 @@ static void __queue_work(unsigned int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
/* determine pool to use */
if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)) {
- struct worker_pool *last_pool;
+ struct worker *worker;
if (cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
/*
- * It's multi cpu. If @work was previously on a different
- * cpu, it might still be running there, in which case the
- * work needs to be queued on that cpu to guarantee
- * non-reentrancy.
+ * It's multi cpu and pool. If @work is still running on a pool,
+ * in which case the work needs to be queued on that pool
+ * to guarantee non-reentrancy.
*/
- pool = get_cwq(cpu, wq)->pool;
- last_pool = get_work_pool(work);
-
- if (last_pool && last_pool != pool) {
- struct worker *worker;
-
- spin_lock(&last_pool->lock);
-
- worker = find_worker_executing_work(last_pool, work);
-
- if (worker && worker->current_cwq->wq == wq)
- pool = last_pool;
- else {
- /* meh... not running there, queue here */
- spin_unlock(&last_pool->lock);
- spin_lock(&pool->lock);
- }
- } else {
+ BUG_ON(get_work_cwq(work));
+ pool = lock_pool_executing_work(work, &worker);
+ if (pool && worker->current_cwq->wq != wq) {
+ spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
+ pool = NULL;
+ }
+ if (!pool) {
+ pool = get_cwq(cpu, wq)->pool;
spin_lock(&pool->lock);
}
} else {
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-31 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-31 18:41 [PATCH 00/13] workqueue: enhance locking and record global worker id for work data Lai Jiangshan
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 01/13] workqueue: remove WORK_CPU_NONE Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 19:49 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 12:03 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-06 22:34 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: replace WORK_CPU_NONE/LAST with WORK_CPU_END Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 02/13] workqueue: fix work_busy() Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 19:54 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 12:06 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-05 18:53 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-06 11:42 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-06 14:05 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-06 23:02 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: make work_busy() test WORK_STRUCT_PENDING first Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 03/13] workqueue: don't set work cwq until we queued it on pool Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:28 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 15:00 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-05 16:45 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-06 11:35 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-06 14:18 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 15:06 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 0:28 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9 workqueue]: add delayed_work->wq to simplify reentrancy handling Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 04/13] workqueue: clear cwq when cancel the work Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 0:53 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: make work->data point to pool after try_to_grab_pending() Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 05/13] workqueue: change queued detection and remove *mb()s Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 1:52 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: simplify is-work-item-queued-here test Tejun Heo
2013-02-07 2:03 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: cosmetic update in try_to_grab_pending() Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 06/13] workqueue: get pool id from work->data directly if it is offq Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 20:16 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: make get_work_pool_id() cheaper Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 07/13] workqueue: get pool from wq/cwq Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 21:13 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: pick cwq instead of pool in __queue_work() Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2013-02-04 21:34 ` [PATCH 08/13] workqueue: add lock_pool_executing_work() Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 12:15 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-05 19:09 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 09/13] workqueue: add lock_pool_queued_work() Lai Jiangshan
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 10/13] workqueue: add lock_pool_own_work() and remove get_work_pool() Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:38 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 11/13] workqueue: allow more work_pool id space Lai Jiangshan
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 12/13] workqueue: add worker's global worker ID Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:39 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 13/13] workqueue: record global worker ID instead of pool ID in work->data when off-queue Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:40 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-04 22:12 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 15:18 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 22:02 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-13 22:23 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-04 21:04 ` [PATCH 00/13] workqueue: enhance locking and record global worker id for work data Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 16:19 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-05 16:50 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1359657696-2767-9-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).