linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] workqueue: fix work_busy()
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 19:42:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACvQF52ej3mzwRhoGO0jmZq7GLOC_KJcxF+R2O1sqQaonYWqnw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130205185349.GF4276@mtj.dyndns.org>

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 08:06:54PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> >>@@ -3453,15 +3451,13 @@ unsigned int work_busy(struct work_struct *work)
>> >>  {
>> >>    struct worker_pool *pool = get_work_pool(work);
>> >>    unsigned long flags;
>> >>-   unsigned int ret = 0;
>> >>+   unsigned int ret = work_pending(work) ? WORK_BUSY_PENDING : 0;
>> >
>> >I'd prefer this as a if() statement.
>> >
>> >>    if (!pool)
>> >>-           return 0;
>> >>+           return ret;
>> >
>> >I'm a bit confused.  When can we be pending w/o pool?
>> >
>>
>> grab the pending bits <==time==> really queued
>>                       ^
>>               this patch considers the work is busy in this time
>
> Given the advisory nature of the function, why do we care?  Is it
> needed for later patches?
>

Ah, yes.

Thanks,
Lai

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-06 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-31 18:41 [PATCH 00/13] workqueue: enhance locking and record global worker id for work data Lai Jiangshan
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 01/13] workqueue: remove WORK_CPU_NONE Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 19:49   ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 12:03     ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-06 22:34   ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: replace WORK_CPU_NONE/LAST with WORK_CPU_END Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 02/13] workqueue: fix work_busy() Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 19:54   ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 12:06     ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-05 18:53       ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-06 11:42         ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2013-02-06 14:05           ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-06 23:02   ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: make work_busy() test WORK_STRUCT_PENDING first Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 03/13] workqueue: don't set work cwq until we queued it on pool Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:28   ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 15:00     ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-05 16:45       ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-06 11:35         ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-06 14:18           ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 15:06     ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07  0:28   ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9 workqueue]: add delayed_work->wq to simplify reentrancy handling Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 04/13] workqueue: clear cwq when cancel the work Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07  0:53   ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: make work->data point to pool after try_to_grab_pending() Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 05/13] workqueue: change queued detection and remove *mb()s Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07  1:52   ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: simplify is-work-item-queued-here test Tejun Heo
2013-02-07  2:03     ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: cosmetic update in try_to_grab_pending() Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 06/13] workqueue: get pool id from work->data directly if it is offq Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 20:16   ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: make get_work_pool_id() cheaper Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 07/13] workqueue: get pool from wq/cwq Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 21:13   ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: pick cwq instead of pool in __queue_work() Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 08/13] workqueue: add lock_pool_executing_work() Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:34   ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 12:15     ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-05 19:09       ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 09/13] workqueue: add lock_pool_queued_work() Lai Jiangshan
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 10/13] workqueue: add lock_pool_own_work() and remove get_work_pool() Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:38   ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 11/13] workqueue: allow more work_pool id space Lai Jiangshan
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 12/13] workqueue: add worker's global worker ID Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:39   ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 13/13] workqueue: record global worker ID instead of pool ID in work->data when off-queue Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:40   ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-04 22:12   ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 15:18     ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 22:02   ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-13 22:23     ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-04 21:04 ` [PATCH 00/13] workqueue: enhance locking and record global worker id for work data Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 16:19   ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-05 16:50     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACvQF52ej3mzwRhoGO0jmZq7GLOC_KJcxF+R2O1sqQaonYWqnw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=eag0628@gmail.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).