From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@gmail.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] workqueue: fix work_busy()
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:53:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130205185349.GF4276@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5110F5DE.6030407@gmail.com>
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 08:06:54PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> >>@@ -3453,15 +3451,13 @@ unsigned int work_busy(struct work_struct *work)
> >> {
> >> struct worker_pool *pool = get_work_pool(work);
> >> unsigned long flags;
> >>- unsigned int ret = 0;
> >>+ unsigned int ret = work_pending(work) ? WORK_BUSY_PENDING : 0;
> >
> >I'd prefer this as a if() statement.
> >
> >> if (!pool)
> >>- return 0;
> >>+ return ret;
> >
> >I'm a bit confused. When can we be pending w/o pool?
> >
>
> grab the pending bits <==time==> really queued
> ^
> this patch considers the work is busy in this time
Given the advisory nature of the function, why do we care? Is it
needed for later patches?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-05 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-31 18:41 [PATCH 00/13] workqueue: enhance locking and record global worker id for work data Lai Jiangshan
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 01/13] workqueue: remove WORK_CPU_NONE Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 19:49 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 12:03 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-06 22:34 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: replace WORK_CPU_NONE/LAST with WORK_CPU_END Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 02/13] workqueue: fix work_busy() Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 19:54 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 12:06 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-05 18:53 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-02-06 11:42 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-06 14:05 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-06 23:02 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: make work_busy() test WORK_STRUCT_PENDING first Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 03/13] workqueue: don't set work cwq until we queued it on pool Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:28 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 15:00 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-05 16:45 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-06 11:35 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-06 14:18 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 15:06 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 0:28 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9 workqueue]: add delayed_work->wq to simplify reentrancy handling Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 04/13] workqueue: clear cwq when cancel the work Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 0:53 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: make work->data point to pool after try_to_grab_pending() Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 05/13] workqueue: change queued detection and remove *mb()s Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 1:52 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: simplify is-work-item-queued-here test Tejun Heo
2013-02-07 2:03 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: cosmetic update in try_to_grab_pending() Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 06/13] workqueue: get pool id from work->data directly if it is offq Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 20:16 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: make get_work_pool_id() cheaper Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 07/13] workqueue: get pool from wq/cwq Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 21:13 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: pick cwq instead of pool in __queue_work() Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 08/13] workqueue: add lock_pool_executing_work() Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:34 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 12:15 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-05 19:09 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 09/13] workqueue: add lock_pool_queued_work() Lai Jiangshan
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 10/13] workqueue: add lock_pool_own_work() and remove get_work_pool() Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:38 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 11/13] workqueue: allow more work_pool id space Lai Jiangshan
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 12/13] workqueue: add worker's global worker ID Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:39 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 13/13] workqueue: record global worker ID instead of pool ID in work->data when off-queue Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:40 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-04 22:12 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 15:18 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 22:02 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-13 22:23 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-04 21:04 ` [PATCH 00/13] workqueue: enhance locking and record global worker id for work data Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 16:19 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-05 16:50 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130205185349.GF4276@mtj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=eag0628@gmail.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).