From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Luis Oliveira <Luis.Oliveira@synopsys.com>,
wsa@the-dreams.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ramiro.Oliveira@synopsys.com, Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com,
CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] i2c: designware: enable SLAVE in platform module
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 19:10:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1482945043.9552.174.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c41db9e0-756d-6697-a845-0d5b1efcaedc@synopsys.com>
On Wed, 2016-12-28 at 16:41 +0000, Luis Oliveira wrote:
> On 28-Dec-16 16:31, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-12-28 at 15:53 +0000, Luis Oliveira wrote:
> > > On 28-Dec-16 15:44, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2016-12-28 at 14:43 +0000, Luis Oliveira wrote:
> > > > > - Slave mode selected in platform module (devicetree support
> > > > > only)
> > > > > - Check for ACPI - not supported in SLAVE mode:
> > > > > - Changed the ifndef style to the use of ACPI_HANDLE that
> > > > > returns
> > > > > NULL
> > > > > if the device was not enumerated from ACPI namespace.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure what is wrong with ACPI?
> > >
> > > I dont have a way to test it. Just that.
> >
> > Okay, can you provide an excerpt to see how it will look like in
> > DTS?
>
> Yes, it looks like this now:
>
> i2c@0x2000 {
> compatible = "snps,designware-i2c";
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> reg = <0x2000 0x100>;
> clock-frequency = <400000>;
> clocks = <&i2cclk>;
> interrupts = <0>;
>
> eeprom@64 {
> compatible = "linux,slave-24c02";
> reg = <0x40000064>;
> };
> };
+1 to Carlos' comment.
> >
> > > > > - dev->functionality = I2C_FUNC_10BIT_ADDR |
> > > > > DW_IC_DEFAULT_FUNCTIONALITY;
> > > > > -
> > > > > - i2c_dw_configure_master(pdev);
> > > > > + if (ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev) == NULL) {
> > > >
> > > > I don't think you need this at all.
> > >
> > > This is to avoid the use of the "ifdef" style I used before.
> >
> > My point is to drop it completely.
> >
> > > >
> > > > > + device_for_each_child_node(&pdev->dev, child)
> > > > > {
> > > >
> > > > This is resource agnostic.
> > > >
> > > > > + fwnode_property_read_u32(child,
> > > > > "reg",
> > > > > ®);
> > > >
> > > > This is as well.
> > >
> > > Are you suggesting I use of_ functions?
> >
> > Nope. See above.
So, ACPI has a property to support slave mode for I2CSerialBus() macro.
I would propose to create a helper function in i2c-core.c which will be
responsible for mode detection
... i2c_slave_mode_detect()
{
...
if (IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node) {
... (use of_*() here) ...
} else if (IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_ACPI) && ACPI_HANDLE(dev))
dev_dbg(..., "ACPI slave is not supported yet\n");
... to master ...
} else {
... default to master ...
}
}
EXPORT_...();
Make it as a separate patch.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-28 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-28 14:43 [PATCH v5 0/7] i2c: designware: add I2C SLAVE support Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] i2c: designware: Cleaning and comment style fixes Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] i2c: designware: refactoring of the i2c-designware Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 15:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-12-28 15:30 ` Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] i2c: designware: MASTER mode as separated driver Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] i2c: designware: introducing I2C_SLAVE definitions Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 15:17 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-12-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] i2c: designware: add SLAVE mode functions Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 15:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-12-28 16:00 ` Luis Oliveira
2016-12-31 23:45 ` kbuild test robot
2016-12-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] i2c: designware: enable SLAVE in platform module Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 15:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-12-28 15:53 ` Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 16:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-12-28 16:41 ` Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 16:49 ` Carlos Palminha
2016-12-28 17:10 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2016-12-28 18:10 ` Luis Oliveira
2017-01-05 12:13 ` Luis Oliveira
2017-01-05 12:43 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-12-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] i2c: designware: style changes in existing code Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 15:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1482945043.9552.174.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com \
--cc=Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com \
--cc=Luis.Oliveira@synopsys.com \
--cc=Ramiro.Oliveira@synopsys.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).