From: Luis Oliveira <Luis.Oliveira@synopsys.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Luis Oliveira <Luis.Oliveira@synopsys.com>, <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
<robh+dt@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
<jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
<mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>, <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <Ramiro.Oliveira@synopsys.com>, <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>,
<CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] i2c: designware: refactoring of the i2c-designware
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 15:30:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21f7135c-7848-0c4c-7188-b1b389c9a168@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1482937968.9552.159.camel@linux.intel.com>
On 28-Dec-16 15:12, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-12-28 at 14:43 +0000, Luis Oliveira wrote:
>> - Factor out all _master() part of code from i2c-designware-core
>> and i2c-designware-platdrv to separate functions.
>> - Standardize all code related with MASTER mode.
>> - I have to take off DW_IC_INTR_TX_EMPTY from DW_IC_INTR_DEFAULT_MASK
>> because it is master specific.
>>
>> The purpose of this is to prepare the controller to have is I2C MASTER
>> flow in a separate driver. To do this first all the
>> functions/definitions related to the MASTER flow were identified.
>
> Thanks for an update.
> Some style related comments below (For the code related is up to you, my
> tag still stands).
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luis Oliveira <lolivei@synopsys.com>
>> ---
>> Changes V4->V5: (ACK by Andy)
>
> When you get an Ack, or other tag (Reviewed-by, Tested-by, etc), and you
> send new version, include this tag to your commit message (it applies to
> all affected patches in your series).
>
Thank you. I didn't knew.
> It would be also good to have some high level changelog in the cover
> letter, from this series I don't see, for example, which base you did
> use (i2c-next? linux-next? v4.9? v4.10-rc1?).
>
>> + dev_dbg(dev->dev,
>> + "%s: enabled=%#x stat=%#x\n", __func__, enabled,
> stat);
>
> I hope you can fit format string on the first line. __func__ is
> redundant when you are using debug printing (Dynamic Debug would include
> it if asked for).
I will check that.
>
>> +static void i2c_dw_configure_master(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct dw_i2c_dev *dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> By the way, does it make sense to pass struct dw_i2c_dev * as a
> parameter of the function?
>
Yes, by looking at it now I think I can pass just the struct dw_i2c_dev
to this function. And probably the same with the i2c_dw_configure_slave.
>> +
>> + dev->master_cfg = DW_IC_CON_MASTER | DW_IC_CON_SLAVE_DISABLE
>> |
>> + DW_IC_CON_RESTART_EN;
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "I am registed as a I2C Master!\n");
>> +
>> + switch (dev->clk_freq) {
>> + case 100000:
>> + dev->master_cfg |= DW_IC_CON_SPEED_STD;
>> + break;
>> + case 3400000:
>> + dev->master_cfg |= DW_IC_CON_SPEED_HIGH;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + dev->master_cfg |= DW_IC_CON_SPEED_FAST;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-28 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-28 14:43 [PATCH v5 0/7] i2c: designware: add I2C SLAVE support Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] i2c: designware: Cleaning and comment style fixes Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] i2c: designware: refactoring of the i2c-designware Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 15:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-12-28 15:30 ` Luis Oliveira [this message]
2016-12-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] i2c: designware: MASTER mode as separated driver Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] i2c: designware: introducing I2C_SLAVE definitions Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 15:17 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-12-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] i2c: designware: add SLAVE mode functions Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 15:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-12-28 16:00 ` Luis Oliveira
2016-12-31 23:45 ` kbuild test robot
2016-12-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] i2c: designware: enable SLAVE in platform module Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 15:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-12-28 15:53 ` Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 16:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-12-28 16:41 ` Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 16:49 ` Carlos Palminha
2016-12-28 17:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-12-28 18:10 ` Luis Oliveira
2017-01-05 12:13 ` Luis Oliveira
2017-01-05 12:43 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-12-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] i2c: designware: style changes in existing code Luis Oliveira
2016-12-28 15:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21f7135c-7848-0c4c-7188-b1b389c9a168@synopsys.com \
--to=luis.oliveira@synopsys.com \
--cc=CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com \
--cc=Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com \
--cc=Ramiro.Oliveira@synopsys.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).