From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rdma tree
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:08:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1516896485.27592.127.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180125085015.GN1393@mtr-leonro.local>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 844 bytes --]
On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 10:50 +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 06:22:59PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > ERROR: "init_rcu_head" [drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.ko] undefined!
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > a11253142e6d ("IB/srpt: Rework multi-channel support")
> >
> > I have used the rdma tree from next-20180119 for today.
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Please see this patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10181845/
This has been pulled into the rdma-next area, you shouldn't have a
problem with this after today.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-25 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-25 7:22 linux-next: build failure after merge of the rdma tree Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-25 8:50 ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-01-25 16:08 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-02-26 2:51 Stephen Rothwell
2020-02-26 3:04 ` Devesh Sharma
2020-02-26 17:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-09 3:30 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-09 7:04 ` Mark Zhang
2019-07-09 7:18 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-09 12:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-09 13:11 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-09 12:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-10 1:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-10 4:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-16 23:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-17 6:33 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-07-17 7:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-08 3:03 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-08 14:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-08 2:57 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-08 16:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-09 3:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-25 18:32 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2019-07-01 4:14 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-01 7:54 ` wangxi
2019-07-01 22:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-04 2:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-04 2:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-04 2:10 ` oulijun
2019-07-04 4:07 ` wangxi
2019-07-04 4:10 ` wangxi
2019-07-04 6:31 ` oulijun
2019-07-05 13:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-05 14:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-04 0:47 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-04 1:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-12-04 9:42 ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-07 2:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-05 12:25 ` Guy Levi(SW)
2018-12-05 22:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-10 0:43 ` Changbin Du
2018-12-10 15:52 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-07-31 2:07 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-21 1:42 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-21 1:58 ` Joe Perches
2017-04-21 2:21 ` Doug Ledford
2017-04-21 2:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-21 2:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-15 0:30 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-15 1:05 ` Doug Ledford
2017-02-15 5:09 ` Selvin Xavier
2016-09-27 1:23 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-27 5:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-27 5:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-27 13:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-27 17:15 ` Doug Ledford
2016-09-28 1:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-28 15:00 ` Doug Ledford
2016-09-28 15:23 ` Greg KH
2016-09-28 15:26 ` Doug Ledford
2016-09-28 21:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-16 1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-16 6:49 ` Herbert Xu
2016-03-16 19:02 ` Doug Ledford
2016-03-16 20:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-16 22:14 ` Ismail, Mustafa
2016-01-13 1:35 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1516896485.27592.127.camel@redhat.com \
--to=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).