From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rdma tree
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:15:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57EAA93E.10106@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160927133949.GA21231@lst.de>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 926 bytes --]
On 9/27/16 9:39 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 03:48:20PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Yeah, sorry. Note, however, that you bothered to fix up this same
>> staging file in another of your patches ...
>
> It's generally not that I don't fix them up because I hate them, it's
> just because they are doing something so incredibly stupid that it would
> take forever to fix up (and something that would have been could if it
> ever had been through review). For this particular case I think everyone
> would be served much better if this module was simply dropped from the
> tree, as there will be lots of future patches that will break it.
>
I don't know that I would drop them, but certainly turn them off. They
can keep their driver up to date.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> GPG Key ID: 0E572FDD
Red Hat, Inc.
100 E. Davie St
Raleigh, NC 27601 USA
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 907 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-27 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-27 1:23 linux-next: build failure after merge of the rdma tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-27 5:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-27 5:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-27 13:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-27 17:15 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
2016-09-28 1:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-28 15:00 ` Doug Ledford
2016-09-28 15:23 ` Greg KH
2016-09-28 15:26 ` Doug Ledford
2016-09-28 21:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-02-26 2:51 Stephen Rothwell
2020-02-26 3:04 ` Devesh Sharma
2020-02-26 17:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-09 3:30 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-09 7:04 ` Mark Zhang
2019-07-09 7:18 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-09 12:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-09 13:11 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-07-09 12:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-10 1:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-10 4:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-16 23:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-17 6:33 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-07-17 7:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-08 3:03 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-08 14:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-08 2:57 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-08 16:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-09 3:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-25 18:32 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2019-07-01 4:14 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-01 7:54 ` wangxi
2019-07-01 22:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-04 2:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-04 2:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-04 2:10 ` oulijun
2019-07-04 4:07 ` wangxi
2019-07-04 4:10 ` wangxi
2019-07-04 6:31 ` oulijun
2019-07-05 13:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-05 14:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-04 0:47 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-04 1:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-12-04 9:42 ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-12-07 2:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-05 12:25 ` Guy Levi(SW)
2018-12-05 22:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-10 0:43 ` Changbin Du
2018-12-10 15:52 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-01-25 7:22 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-25 8:50 ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-01-25 16:08 ` Doug Ledford
2017-07-31 2:07 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-21 1:42 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-21 1:58 ` Joe Perches
2017-04-21 2:21 ` Doug Ledford
2017-04-21 2:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-21 2:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-15 0:30 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-15 1:05 ` Doug Ledford
2017-02-15 5:09 ` Selvin Xavier
2016-03-16 1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-16 6:49 ` Herbert Xu
2016-03-16 19:02 ` Doug Ledford
2016-03-16 20:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-16 22:14 ` Ismail, Mustafa
2016-01-13 1:35 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57EAA93E.10106@redhat.com \
--to=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).