linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/8] irqchip: stm32: add stm32h7 support
@ 2017-07-07  7:26 Ludovic Barre
  2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 1/8] irqchip: stm32: select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP Ludovic Barre
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Barre @ 2017-07-07  7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Jason Cooper, Marc Zyngier
  Cc: Maxime Coquelin, Alexandre Torgue, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel

From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>

This series adds:
-management of multi-bank of external interrupts
stm32h7 has up to 96 inputs (3 banks of  32 inputs)
-fix initial value after cold/hot boot (wakeup issue)

Ludovic Barre (8):
  irqchip: stm32: select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
  irqchip: stm32: add multi-bank management
  dt-bindings: interrupt-controllers: add compatible string for stm32h7
  irqchip: stm32: add stm32h7 support
  irqchip: stm32: fix initial values
  irqchip: stm32: move the wakeup on interrupt mask
  ARM: dts: stm32: add exti support for stm32h743
  ARM: dts: stm32: add support of exti on stm32h743 pinctrl

 .../interrupt-controller/st,stm32-exti.txt         |   4 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743-pinctrl.dtsi           |  24 +++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi                   |   8 +
 drivers/irqchip/Kconfig                            |   1 +
 drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c                   | 194 +++++++++++++++------
 5 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/8] irqchip: stm32: select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
  2017-07-07  7:26 [PATCH 0/8] irqchip: stm32: add stm32h7 support Ludovic Barre
@ 2017-07-07  7:26 ` Ludovic Barre
  2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 2/8] irqchip: stm32: add multi-bank management Ludovic Barre
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Barre @ 2017-07-07  7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Jason Cooper, Marc Zyngier
  Cc: Maxime Coquelin, Alexandre Torgue, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel

From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>

Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
index 676232a..202f77c 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
@@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ config EZNPS_GIC
 config STM32_EXTI
 	bool
 	select IRQ_DOMAIN
+	select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
 
 config QCOM_IRQ_COMBINER
 	bool "QCOM IRQ combiner support"
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/8] irqchip: stm32: add multi-bank management
  2017-07-07  7:26 [PATCH 0/8] irqchip: stm32: add stm32h7 support Ludovic Barre
  2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 1/8] irqchip: stm32: select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP Ludovic Barre
@ 2017-07-07  7:26 ` Ludovic Barre
  2017-08-07 13:21   ` Marc Zyngier
  2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 3/8] dt-bindings: interrupt-controllers: add compatible string for stm32h7 Ludovic Barre
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Barre @ 2017-07-07  7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Jason Cooper, Marc Zyngier
  Cc: Maxime Coquelin, Alexandre Torgue, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel

From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>

-prepare to manage multi-bank
-prepare to manage registers offset by compatible

Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
index 491568c..308cef5 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
@@ -14,27 +14,52 @@
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
 #include <linux/of_irq.h>
 
-#define EXTI_IMR	0x0
-#define EXTI_EMR	0x4
-#define EXTI_RTSR	0x8
-#define EXTI_FTSR	0xc
-#define EXTI_SWIER	0x10
-#define EXTI_PR		0x14
+struct stm32_exti_bank {
+	u32 imr_ofst;
+	u32 emr_ofst;
+	u32 rtsr_ofst;
+	u32 ftsr_ofst;
+	u32 swier_ofst;
+	u32 pr_ofst;
+
+	u32 irqs_mask;
+};
+
+static struct stm32_exti_bank stm32f4xx_exti_b1 = {
+	.imr_ofst	= 0x00,
+	.emr_ofst	= 0x04,
+	.rtsr_ofst	= 0x08,
+	.ftsr_ofst	= 0x0C,
+	.swier_ofst	= 0x10,
+	.pr_ofst	= 0x14,
+};
+
+static struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32f4xx_exti_banks[] = {
+	&stm32f4xx_exti_b1,
+};
 
 static void stm32_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
 {
 	struct irq_domain *domain = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
-	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = domain->gc->gc[0];
 	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
+	unsigned int virq, nbanks = domain->gc->num_chips;
+	struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
+	struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank;
 	unsigned long pending;
-	int n;
+	int n, i, irq_base = 0;
 
 	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
 
-	while ((pending = irq_reg_readl(gc, EXTI_PR))) {
-		for_each_set_bit(n, &pending, BITS_PER_LONG) {
-			generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(domain, n));
-			irq_reg_writel(gc, BIT(n), EXTI_PR);
+	for (i = 0; i < nbanks; i++, irq_base += BITS_PER_LONG) {
+		gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(domain, irq_base);
+		stm32_bank = gc->private;
+
+		while ((pending = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->pr_ofst))) {
+			for_each_set_bit(n, &pending, BITS_PER_LONG) {
+				virq = irq_find_mapping(domain, irq_base + n);
+				generic_handle_irq(virq);
+				irq_reg_writel(gc, BIT(n), stm32_bank->pr_ofst);
+			}
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -44,13 +69,14 @@ static void stm32_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
 static int stm32_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
 {
 	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
-	int pin = data->hwirq;
+	struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank = gc->private;
+	int pin = data->hwirq % BITS_PER_LONG;
 	u32 rtsr, ftsr;
 
 	irq_gc_lock(gc);
 
-	rtsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, EXTI_RTSR);
-	ftsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, EXTI_FTSR);
+	rtsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
+	ftsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->ftsr_ofst);
 
 	switch (type) {
 	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
@@ -70,8 +96,8 @@ static int stm32_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	irq_reg_writel(gc, rtsr, EXTI_RTSR);
-	irq_reg_writel(gc, ftsr, EXTI_FTSR);
+	irq_reg_writel(gc, rtsr, stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
+	irq_reg_writel(gc, ftsr, stm32_bank->ftsr_ofst);
 
 	irq_gc_unlock(gc);
 
@@ -81,17 +107,18 @@ static int stm32_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
 static int stm32_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
 {
 	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
-	int pin = data->hwirq;
+	struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank = gc->private;
+	int pin = data->hwirq % BITS_PER_LONG;
 	u32 emr;
 
 	irq_gc_lock(gc);
 
-	emr = irq_reg_readl(gc, EXTI_EMR);
+	emr = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->emr_ofst);
 	if (on)
 		emr |= BIT(pin);
 	else
 		emr &= ~BIT(pin);
-	irq_reg_writel(gc, emr, EXTI_EMR);
+	irq_reg_writel(gc, emr, stm32_bank->emr_ofst);
 
 	irq_gc_unlock(gc);
 
@@ -101,11 +128,12 @@ static int stm32_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
 static int stm32_exti_alloc(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
 			    unsigned int nr_irqs, void *data)
 {
-	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = d->gc->gc[0];
+	struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
 	struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = data;
 	irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
 
 	hwirq = fwspec->param[0];
+	gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(d, hwirq);
 
 	irq_map_generic_chip(d, virq, hwirq);
 	irq_domain_set_info(d, virq, hwirq, &gc->chip_types->chip, gc,
@@ -129,8 +157,8 @@ struct irq_domain_ops irq_exti_domain_ops = {
 	.free	= stm32_exti_free,
 };
 
-static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct device_node *node,
-				  struct device_node *parent)
+static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct stm32_exti_bank **stm32_exti_banks,
+				  int bank_nr, struct device_node *node)
 {
 	unsigned int clr = IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE | IRQ_NOAUTOEN;
 	int nr_irqs, nr_exti, ret, i;
@@ -144,23 +172,16 @@ static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct device_node *node,
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
-	/* Determine number of irqs supported */
-	writel_relaxed(~0UL, base + EXTI_RTSR);
-	nr_exti = fls(readl_relaxed(base + EXTI_RTSR));
-	writel_relaxed(0, base + EXTI_RTSR);
-
-	pr_info("%s: %d External IRQs detected\n", node->full_name, nr_exti);
-
-	domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, nr_exti,
+	domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, bank_nr * BITS_PER_LONG,
 				       &irq_exti_domain_ops, NULL);
 	if (!domain) {
 		pr_err("%s: Could not register interrupt domain.\n",
-				node->name);
+		       node->name);
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out_unmap;
 	}
 
-	ret = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(domain, nr_exti, 1, "exti",
+	ret = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(domain, BITS_PER_LONG, 1, "exti",
 					     handle_edge_irq, clr, 0, 0);
 	if (ret) {
 		pr_err("%s: Could not allocate generic interrupt chip.\n",
@@ -168,18 +189,35 @@ static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct device_node *node,
 		goto out_free_domain;
 	}
 
-	gc = domain->gc->gc[0];
-	gc->reg_base                         = base;
-	gc->chip_types->type               = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH;
-	gc->chip_types->chip.name          = gc->chip_types[0].chip.name;
-	gc->chip_types->chip.irq_ack       = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
-	gc->chip_types->chip.irq_mask      = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
-	gc->chip_types->chip.irq_unmask    = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
-	gc->chip_types->chip.irq_set_type  = stm32_irq_set_type;
-	gc->chip_types->chip.irq_set_wake  = stm32_irq_set_wake;
-	gc->chip_types->regs.ack           = EXTI_PR;
-	gc->chip_types->regs.mask          = EXTI_IMR;
-	gc->chip_types->handler            = handle_edge_irq;
+	for (i = 0; i < bank_nr; i++) {
+		struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank = stm32_exti_banks[i];
+		u32 irqs_mask;
+
+		gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(domain, i * BITS_PER_LONG);
+
+		gc->reg_base = base;
+		gc->chip_types->type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH;
+		gc->chip_types->chip.name = gc->chip_types[0].chip.name;
+		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
+		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
+		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
+		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_set_type = stm32_irq_set_type;
+		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_set_wake = stm32_irq_set_wake;
+		gc->chip_types->regs.ack = stm32_bank->pr_ofst;
+		gc->chip_types->regs.mask = stm32_bank->imr_ofst;
+		gc->chip_types->handler = handle_edge_irq;
+		gc->private = stm32_bank;
+
+		/* Determine number of irqs supported */
+		writel_relaxed(~0UL, base + stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
+		irqs_mask = readl_relaxed(base + stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
+		stm32_bank->irqs_mask = irqs_mask;
+		nr_exti = fls(readl_relaxed(base + stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst));
+		writel_relaxed(0, base + stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
+
+		pr_info("%s: bank%d, External IRQs available:%#x\n",
+			node->full_name, i, irqs_mask);
+	}
 
 	nr_irqs = of_irq_count(node);
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
@@ -198,4 +236,11 @@ static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct device_node *node,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-IRQCHIP_DECLARE(stm32_exti, "st,stm32-exti", stm32_exti_init);
+static int __init stm32f4_exti_of_init(struct device_node *np,
+				       struct device_node *parent)
+{
+	return stm32_exti_init(stm32f4xx_exti_banks,
+			ARRAY_SIZE(stm32f4xx_exti_banks), np);
+}
+
+IRQCHIP_DECLARE(stm32f4_exti, "st,stm32-exti", stm32f4_exti_of_init);
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/8] dt-bindings: interrupt-controllers: add compatible string for stm32h7
  2017-07-07  7:26 [PATCH 0/8] irqchip: stm32: add stm32h7 support Ludovic Barre
  2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 1/8] irqchip: stm32: select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP Ludovic Barre
  2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 2/8] irqchip: stm32: add multi-bank management Ludovic Barre
@ 2017-07-07  7:26 ` Ludovic Barre
  2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 4/8] irqchip: stm32: add stm32h7 support Ludovic Barre
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Barre @ 2017-07-07  7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Jason Cooper, Marc Zyngier
  Cc: Maxime Coquelin, Alexandre Torgue, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel

From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>

Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/st,stm32-exti.txt        | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/st,stm32-exti.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/st,stm32-exti.txt
index 6e7703d..edf03f0 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/st,stm32-exti.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/st,stm32-exti.txt
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@ STM32 External Interrupt Controller
 
 Required properties:
 
-- compatible: Should be "st,stm32-exti"
+- compatible: Should be:
+    "st,stm32-exti"
+    "st,stm32h7-exti"
 - reg: Specifies base physical address and size of the registers
 - interrupt-controller: Indentifies the node as an interrupt controller
 - #interrupt-cells: Specifies the number of cells to encode an interrupt
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/8] irqchip: stm32: add stm32h7 support
  2017-07-07  7:26 [PATCH 0/8] irqchip: stm32: add stm32h7 support Ludovic Barre
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 3/8] dt-bindings: interrupt-controllers: add compatible string for stm32h7 Ludovic Barre
@ 2017-07-07  7:26 ` Ludovic Barre
  2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 5/8] irqchip: stm32: fix initial values Ludovic Barre
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Barre @ 2017-07-07  7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Jason Cooper, Marc Zyngier
  Cc: Maxime Coquelin, Alexandre Torgue, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel

From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>

stm32h7 has up to 96 input
(3 banks of 32 input max)

Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
index 308cef5..69ae09d 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
@@ -38,6 +38,39 @@ static struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32f4xx_exti_banks[] = {
 	&stm32f4xx_exti_b1,
 };
 
+static struct stm32_exti_bank stm32h7xx_exti_b1 = {
+	.imr_ofst	= 0x80,
+	.emr_ofst	= 0x84,
+	.rtsr_ofst	= 0x00,
+	.ftsr_ofst	= 0x04,
+	.swier_ofst	= 0x08,
+	.pr_ofst	= 0x88,
+};
+
+static struct stm32_exti_bank stm32h7xx_exti_b2 = {
+	.imr_ofst	= 0x90,
+	.emr_ofst	= 0x94,
+	.rtsr_ofst	= 0x20,
+	.ftsr_ofst	= 0x24,
+	.swier_ofst	= 0x28,
+	.pr_ofst	= 0x98,
+};
+
+static struct stm32_exti_bank stm32h7xx_exti_b3 = {
+	.imr_ofst	= 0xA0,
+	.emr_ofst	= 0xA4,
+	.rtsr_ofst	= 0x40,
+	.ftsr_ofst	= 0x44,
+	.swier_ofst	= 0x48,
+	.pr_ofst	= 0xA8,
+};
+
+static struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32h7xx_exti_banks[] = {
+	&stm32h7xx_exti_b1,
+	&stm32h7xx_exti_b2,
+	&stm32h7xx_exti_b3,
+};
+
 static void stm32_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
 {
 	struct irq_domain *domain = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
@@ -244,3 +277,12 @@ static int __init stm32f4_exti_of_init(struct device_node *np,
 }
 
 IRQCHIP_DECLARE(stm32f4_exti, "st,stm32-exti", stm32f4_exti_of_init);
+
+static int __init stm32h7_exti_of_init(struct device_node *np,
+				       struct device_node *parent)
+{
+	return stm32_exti_init(stm32h7xx_exti_banks,
+			ARRAY_SIZE(stm32h7xx_exti_banks), np);
+}
+
+IRQCHIP_DECLARE(stm32h7_exti, "st,stm32h7-exti", stm32h7_exti_of_init);
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 5/8] irqchip: stm32: fix initial values
  2017-07-07  7:26 [PATCH 0/8] irqchip: stm32: add stm32h7 support Ludovic Barre
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 4/8] irqchip: stm32: add stm32h7 support Ludovic Barre
@ 2017-07-07  7:26 ` Ludovic Barre
  2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 6/8] irqchip: stm32: move the wakeup on interrupt mask Ludovic Barre
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Barre @ 2017-07-07  7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Jason Cooper, Marc Zyngier
  Cc: Maxime Coquelin, Alexandre Torgue, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel

From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>

-after cold boot, imr default value depend of hw configuration
-after hot reboot the registers must be cleared to avoid residue

Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
index 69ae09d..3c7077d 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
@@ -246,7 +246,16 @@ static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct stm32_exti_bank **stm32_exti_banks,
 		irqs_mask = readl_relaxed(base + stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
 		stm32_bank->irqs_mask = irqs_mask;
 		nr_exti = fls(readl_relaxed(base + stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst));
+
+		/*
+		 * This IP has no reset, so after hot reboot we should
+		 * clear registers to avoid residue
+		 */
+		writel_relaxed(0, base + stm32_bank->imr_ofst);
+		writel_relaxed(0, base + stm32_bank->emr_ofst);
 		writel_relaxed(0, base + stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
+		writel_relaxed(0, base + stm32_bank->ftsr_ofst);
+		writel_relaxed(~0UL, base + stm32_bank->pr_ofst);
 
 		pr_info("%s: bank%d, External IRQs available:%#x\n",
 			node->full_name, i, irqs_mask);
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 6/8] irqchip: stm32: move the wakeup on interrupt mask
  2017-07-07  7:26 [PATCH 0/8] irqchip: stm32: add stm32h7 support Ludovic Barre
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 5/8] irqchip: stm32: fix initial values Ludovic Barre
@ 2017-07-07  7:26 ` Ludovic Barre
  2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 7/8] ARM: dts: stm32: add exti support for stm32h743 Ludovic Barre
  2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM: dts: stm32: add support of exti on stm32h743 pinctrl Ludovic Barre
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Barre @ 2017-07-07  7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Jason Cooper, Marc Zyngier
  Cc: Maxime Coquelin, Alexandre Torgue, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel

From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>

move irq_set_wake on interrupt mask, needed to out of
low power mode (wakeup source)

Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
index 3c7077d..f92c103 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
@@ -142,16 +142,16 @@ static int stm32_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
 	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
 	struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank = gc->private;
 	int pin = data->hwirq % BITS_PER_LONG;
-	u32 emr;
+	u32 imr;
 
 	irq_gc_lock(gc);
 
-	emr = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->emr_ofst);
+	imr = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->imr_ofst);
 	if (on)
-		emr |= BIT(pin);
+		imr |= BIT(pin);
 	else
-		emr &= ~BIT(pin);
-	irq_reg_writel(gc, emr, stm32_bank->emr_ofst);
+		imr &= ~BIT(pin);
+	irq_reg_writel(gc, imr, stm32_bank->imr_ofst);
 
 	irq_gc_unlock(gc);
 
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 7/8] ARM: dts: stm32: add exti support for stm32h743
  2017-07-07  7:26 [PATCH 0/8] irqchip: stm32: add stm32h7 support Ludovic Barre
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 6/8] irqchip: stm32: move the wakeup on interrupt mask Ludovic Barre
@ 2017-07-07  7:26 ` Ludovic Barre
  2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM: dts: stm32: add support of exti on stm32h743 pinctrl Ludovic Barre
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Barre @ 2017-07-07  7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Jason Cooper, Marc Zyngier
  Cc: Maxime Coquelin, Alexandre Torgue, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel

From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>

this patch add support of external interrupt (exti)
for stm32h743

Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi
index 4685629..730cbd8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi
@@ -74,6 +74,14 @@
 			interrupts = <50>;
 			clocks = <&timer_clk>;
 		};
+
+		exti: interrupt-controller@58000000 {
+			compatible = "st,stm32h7-exti";
+			interrupt-controller;
+			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
+			reg = <0x58000000 0x400>;
+			interrupts = <1>, <2>, <3>, <6>, <7>, <8>, <9>, <10>, <23>, <40>, <41>, <62>, <76>;
+		};
 	};
 };
 
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 8/8] ARM: dts: stm32: add support of exti on stm32h743 pinctrl
  2017-07-07  7:26 [PATCH 0/8] irqchip: stm32: add stm32h7 support Ludovic Barre
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 7/8] ARM: dts: stm32: add exti support for stm32h743 Ludovic Barre
@ 2017-07-07  7:26 ` Ludovic Barre
  2017-07-07  8:16   ` Alexandre Torgue
  7 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Barre @ 2017-07-07  7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Jason Cooper, Marc Zyngier
  Cc: Maxime Coquelin, Alexandre Torgue, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel

From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>

Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743-pinctrl.dtsi | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743-pinctrl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743-pinctrl.dtsi
index fcc1e06..8854d26 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743-pinctrl.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743-pinctrl.dtsi
@@ -49,6 +49,8 @@
 			#size-cells = <1>;
 			compatible = "st,stm32h743-pinctrl";
 			ranges = <0 0x58020000 0x3000>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&exti>;
+			st,syscfg = <&syscfg 0x8>;
 			pins-are-numbered;
 
 			gpioa: gpio@58020000 {
@@ -57,6 +59,8 @@
 				reg = <0x0 0x400>;
 				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
 				st,bank-name = "GPIOA";
+				interrupt-controller;
+				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
 			};
 
 			gpiob: gpio@58020400 {
@@ -65,6 +69,8 @@
 				reg = <0x400 0x400>;
 				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
 				st,bank-name = "GPIOB";
+				interrupt-controller;
+				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
 			};
 
 			gpioc: gpio@58020800 {
@@ -73,6 +79,8 @@
 				reg = <0x800 0x400>;
 				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
 				st,bank-name = "GPIOC";
+				interrupt-controller;
+				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
 			};
 
 			gpiod: gpio@58020c00 {
@@ -81,6 +89,8 @@
 				reg = <0xc00 0x400>;
 				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
 				st,bank-name = "GPIOD";
+				interrupt-controller;
+				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
 			};
 
 			gpioe: gpio@58021000 {
@@ -89,6 +99,8 @@
 				reg = <0x1000 0x400>;
 				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
 				st,bank-name = "GPIOE";
+				interrupt-controller;
+				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
 			};
 
 			gpiof: gpio@58021400 {
@@ -97,6 +109,8 @@
 				reg = <0x1400 0x400>;
 				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
 				st,bank-name = "GPIOF";
+				interrupt-controller;
+				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
 			};
 
 			gpiog: gpio@58021800 {
@@ -105,6 +119,8 @@
 				reg = <0x1800 0x400>;
 				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
 				st,bank-name = "GPIOG";
+				interrupt-controller;
+				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
 			};
 
 			gpioh: gpio@58021c00 {
@@ -113,6 +129,8 @@
 				reg = <0x1c00 0x400>;
 				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
 				st,bank-name = "GPIOH";
+				interrupt-controller;
+				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
 			};
 
 			gpioi: gpio@58022000 {
@@ -121,6 +139,8 @@
 				reg = <0x2000 0x400>;
 				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
 				st,bank-name = "GPIOI";
+				interrupt-controller;
+				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
 			};
 
 			gpioj: gpio@58022400 {
@@ -129,6 +149,8 @@
 				reg = <0x2400 0x400>;
 				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
 				st,bank-name = "GPIOJ";
+				interrupt-controller;
+				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
 			};
 
 			gpiok: gpio@58022800 {
@@ -137,6 +159,8 @@
 				reg = <0x2800 0x400>;
 				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
 				st,bank-name = "GPIOK";
+				interrupt-controller;
+				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
 			};
 
 			usart1_pins: usart1@0 {
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 8/8] ARM: dts: stm32: add support of exti on stm32h743 pinctrl
  2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM: dts: stm32: add support of exti on stm32h743 pinctrl Ludovic Barre
@ 2017-07-07  8:16   ` Alexandre Torgue
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Torgue @ 2017-07-07  8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Barre, Thomas Gleixner, Jason Cooper, Marc Zyngier
  Cc: Maxime Coquelin, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel

Hi Ludovic

On 07/07/2017 09:26 AM, Ludovic Barre wrote:
> From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
> ---

Can you fill commit message please


>   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743-pinctrl.dtsi | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743-pinctrl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743-pinctrl.dtsi
> index fcc1e06..8854d26 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743-pinctrl.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743-pinctrl.dtsi
> @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@
>   			#size-cells = <1>;
>   			compatible = "st,stm32h743-pinctrl";
>   			ranges = <0 0x58020000 0x3000>;
> +			interrupt-parent = <&exti>;
> +			st,syscfg = <&syscfg 0x8>;
>   			pins-are-numbered;
>   
>   			gpioa: gpio@58020000 {
> @@ -57,6 +59,8 @@
>   				reg = <0x0 0x400>;
>   				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
>   				st,bank-name = "GPIOA";
> +				interrupt-controller;
> +				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
>   			};
>   
>   			gpiob: gpio@58020400 {
> @@ -65,6 +69,8 @@
>   				reg = <0x400 0x400>;
>   				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
>   				st,bank-name = "GPIOB";
> +				interrupt-controller;
> +				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
>   			};
>   
>   			gpioc: gpio@58020800 {
> @@ -73,6 +79,8 @@
>   				reg = <0x800 0x400>;
>   				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
>   				st,bank-name = "GPIOC";
> +				interrupt-controller;
> +				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
>   			};
>   
>   			gpiod: gpio@58020c00 {
> @@ -81,6 +89,8 @@
>   				reg = <0xc00 0x400>;
>   				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
>   				st,bank-name = "GPIOD";
> +				interrupt-controller;
> +				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
>   			};
>   
>   			gpioe: gpio@58021000 {
> @@ -89,6 +99,8 @@
>   				reg = <0x1000 0x400>;
>   				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
>   				st,bank-name = "GPIOE";
> +				interrupt-controller;
> +				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
>   			};
>   
>   			gpiof: gpio@58021400 {
> @@ -97,6 +109,8 @@
>   				reg = <0x1400 0x400>;
>   				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
>   				st,bank-name = "GPIOF";
> +				interrupt-controller;
> +				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
>   			};
>   
>   			gpiog: gpio@58021800 {
> @@ -105,6 +119,8 @@
>   				reg = <0x1800 0x400>;
>   				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
>   				st,bank-name = "GPIOG";
> +				interrupt-controller;
> +				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
>   			};
>   
>   			gpioh: gpio@58021c00 {
> @@ -113,6 +129,8 @@
>   				reg = <0x1c00 0x400>;
>   				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
>   				st,bank-name = "GPIOH";
> +				interrupt-controller;
> +				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
>   			};
>   
>   			gpioi: gpio@58022000 {
> @@ -121,6 +139,8 @@
>   				reg = <0x2000 0x400>;
>   				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
>   				st,bank-name = "GPIOI";
> +				interrupt-controller;
> +				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
>   			};
>   
>   			gpioj: gpio@58022400 {
> @@ -129,6 +149,8 @@
>   				reg = <0x2400 0x400>;
>   				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
>   				st,bank-name = "GPIOJ";
> +				interrupt-controller;
> +				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
>   			};
>   
>   			gpiok: gpio@58022800 {
> @@ -137,6 +159,8 @@
>   				reg = <0x2800 0x400>;
>   				clocks = <&timer_clk>;
>   				st,bank-name = "GPIOK";
> +				interrupt-controller;
> +				#interrupt-cells = <2>;
>   			};
>   
>   			usart1_pins: usart1@0 {
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/8] irqchip: stm32: add multi-bank management
  2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 2/8] irqchip: stm32: add multi-bank management Ludovic Barre
@ 2017-08-07 13:21   ` Marc Zyngier
  2017-08-08  9:28     ` Ludovic BARRE
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2017-08-07 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Barre, Thomas Gleixner, Jason Cooper
  Cc: Maxime Coquelin, Alexandre Torgue, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel

On 07/07/17 08:26, Ludovic Barre wrote:
> From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
> 
> -prepare to manage multi-bank
> -prepare to manage registers offset by compatible
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> index 491568c..308cef5 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> @@ -14,27 +14,52 @@
>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
>  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>  
> -#define EXTI_IMR	0x0
> -#define EXTI_EMR	0x4
> -#define EXTI_RTSR	0x8
> -#define EXTI_FTSR	0xc
> -#define EXTI_SWIER	0x10
> -#define EXTI_PR		0x14
> +struct stm32_exti_bank {
> +	u32 imr_ofst;
> +	u32 emr_ofst;
> +	u32 rtsr_ofst;
> +	u32 ftsr_ofst;
> +	u32 swier_ofst;
> +	u32 pr_ofst;
> +
> +	u32 irqs_mask;
> +};

This looks weird. On one hand, you have a set of offsets that are
typical of the HW, and yet you add to it a mask that is read from the HW
(and not hardcoded like the rest).

> +
> +static struct stm32_exti_bank stm32f4xx_exti_b1 = {
> +	.imr_ofst	= 0x00,
> +	.emr_ofst	= 0x04,
> +	.rtsr_ofst	= 0x08,
> +	.ftsr_ofst	= 0x0C,
> +	.swier_ofst	= 0x10,
> +	.pr_ofst	= 0x14,
> +};

And this prevents making this structure const, which it should be.

> +
> +static struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32f4xx_exti_banks[] = {
> +	&stm32f4xx_exti_b1,
> +};
>  
>  static void stm32_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  {
>  	struct irq_domain *domain = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> -	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = domain->gc->gc[0];
>  	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +	unsigned int virq, nbanks = domain->gc->num_chips;
> +	struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
> +	struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank;
>  	unsigned long pending;
> -	int n;
> +	int n, i, irq_base = 0;
>  
>  	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
>  
> -	while ((pending = irq_reg_readl(gc, EXTI_PR))) {
> -		for_each_set_bit(n, &pending, BITS_PER_LONG) {
> -			generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(domain, n));
> -			irq_reg_writel(gc, BIT(n), EXTI_PR);
> +	for (i = 0; i < nbanks; i++, irq_base += BITS_PER_LONG) {

Are you guaranteed that all the interrupts are organised in a linear
way? No hole between them? Ever?

> +		gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(domain, irq_base);
> +		stm32_bank = gc->private;
> +
> +		while ((pending = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->pr_ofst))) {
> +			for_each_set_bit(n, &pending, BITS_PER_LONG) {
> +				virq = irq_find_mapping(domain, irq_base + n);
> +				generic_handle_irq(virq);
> +				irq_reg_writel(gc, BIT(n), stm32_bank->pr_ofst);

This code doesn't look very good. Since you already have the bank as
part of your gc structure, why don't you add a set of wrappers such as:

static void stm32_irq_write_pr(struct irq_chip_generic *gc, u32 val)
{
	struct stm32_exti_bank *bank = gc->private;
	irq_reg_writel(gc, val, bank->pr_ofst);
}

Nobody really want to know about this offset business, so just hide it
as much as possible.

> +			}
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -44,13 +69,14 @@ static void stm32_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  static int stm32_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
>  {
>  	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> -	int pin = data->hwirq;
> +	struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank = gc->private;
> +	int pin = data->hwirq % BITS_PER_LONG;
>  	u32 rtsr, ftsr;
>  
>  	irq_gc_lock(gc);
>  
> -	rtsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, EXTI_RTSR);
> -	ftsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, EXTI_FTSR);
> +	rtsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
> +	ftsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->ftsr_ofst);
>  
>  	switch (type) {
>  	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> @@ -70,8 +96,8 @@ static int stm32_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	irq_reg_writel(gc, rtsr, EXTI_RTSR);
> -	irq_reg_writel(gc, ftsr, EXTI_FTSR);
> +	irq_reg_writel(gc, rtsr, stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
> +	irq_reg_writel(gc, ftsr, stm32_bank->ftsr_ofst);
>  
>  	irq_gc_unlock(gc);
>  
> @@ -81,17 +107,18 @@ static int stm32_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
>  static int stm32_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
>  {
>  	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> -	int pin = data->hwirq;
> +	struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank = gc->private;
> +	int pin = data->hwirq % BITS_PER_LONG;
>  	u32 emr;
>  
>  	irq_gc_lock(gc);
>  
> -	emr = irq_reg_readl(gc, EXTI_EMR);
> +	emr = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->emr_ofst);
>  	if (on)
>  		emr |= BIT(pin);
>  	else
>  		emr &= ~BIT(pin);
> -	irq_reg_writel(gc, emr, EXTI_EMR);
> +	irq_reg_writel(gc, emr, stm32_bank->emr_ofst);
>  
>  	irq_gc_unlock(gc);
>  
> @@ -101,11 +128,12 @@ static int stm32_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
>  static int stm32_exti_alloc(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
>  			    unsigned int nr_irqs, void *data)
>  {
> -	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = d->gc->gc[0];
> +	struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
>  	struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = data;
>  	irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
>  
>  	hwirq = fwspec->param[0];
> +	gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(d, hwirq);
>  
>  	irq_map_generic_chip(d, virq, hwirq);
>  	irq_domain_set_info(d, virq, hwirq, &gc->chip_types->chip, gc,
> @@ -129,8 +157,8 @@ struct irq_domain_ops irq_exti_domain_ops = {
>  	.free	= stm32_exti_free,
>  };
>  
> -static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct device_node *node,
> -				  struct device_node *parent)
> +static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct stm32_exti_bank **stm32_exti_banks,
> +				  int bank_nr, struct device_node *node)
>  {
>  	unsigned int clr = IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE | IRQ_NOAUTOEN;
>  	int nr_irqs, nr_exti, ret, i;
> @@ -144,23 +172,16 @@ static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct device_node *node,
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Determine number of irqs supported */
> -	writel_relaxed(~0UL, base + EXTI_RTSR);
> -	nr_exti = fls(readl_relaxed(base + EXTI_RTSR));
> -	writel_relaxed(0, base + EXTI_RTSR);
> -
> -	pr_info("%s: %d External IRQs detected\n", node->full_name, nr_exti);
> -
> -	domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, nr_exti,
> +	domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, bank_nr * BITS_PER_LONG,

You used to size the domain with the number of *implemented* interrupts.
Now, it becomes something else. Why is that so? Also, is BITS_PER_LONG
the right macro? Shouldn't it be something like "IRQS_PER_BANK", or
something similar? Just in case someone recycles this block on a 64bit
CPU...

>  				       &irq_exti_domain_ops, NULL);
>  	if (!domain) {
>  		pr_err("%s: Could not register interrupt domain.\n",
> -				node->name);
> +		       node->name);
>  		ret = -ENOMEM;
>  		goto out_unmap;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(domain, nr_exti, 1, "exti",
> +	ret = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(domain, BITS_PER_LONG, 1, "exti",

And here, you're not multiplying it by the number of banks. Why?

>  					     handle_edge_irq, clr, 0, 0);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		pr_err("%s: Could not allocate generic interrupt chip.\n",
> @@ -168,18 +189,35 @@ static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct device_node *node,
>  		goto out_free_domain;
>  	}
>  
> -	gc = domain->gc->gc[0];
> -	gc->reg_base                         = base;
> -	gc->chip_types->type               = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH;
> -	gc->chip_types->chip.name          = gc->chip_types[0].chip.name;
> -	gc->chip_types->chip.irq_ack       = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
> -	gc->chip_types->chip.irq_mask      = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
> -	gc->chip_types->chip.irq_unmask    = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
> -	gc->chip_types->chip.irq_set_type  = stm32_irq_set_type;
> -	gc->chip_types->chip.irq_set_wake  = stm32_irq_set_wake;
> -	gc->chip_types->regs.ack           = EXTI_PR;
> -	gc->chip_types->regs.mask          = EXTI_IMR;
> -	gc->chip_types->handler            = handle_edge_irq;
> +	for (i = 0; i < bank_nr; i++) {
> +		struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank = stm32_exti_banks[i];
> +		u32 irqs_mask;
> +
> +		gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(domain, i * BITS_PER_LONG);
> +
> +		gc->reg_base = base;
> +		gc->chip_types->type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH;
> +		gc->chip_types->chip.name = gc->chip_types[0].chip.name;
> +		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
> +		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
> +		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
> +		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_set_type = stm32_irq_set_type;
> +		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_set_wake = stm32_irq_set_wake;
> +		gc->chip_types->regs.ack = stm32_bank->pr_ofst;
> +		gc->chip_types->regs.mask = stm32_bank->imr_ofst;
> +		gc->chip_types->handler = handle_edge_irq;
> +		gc->private = stm32_bank;
> +
> +		/* Determine number of irqs supported */
> +		writel_relaxed(~0UL, base + stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
> +		irqs_mask = readl_relaxed(base + stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
> +		stm32_bank->irqs_mask = irqs_mask;
> +		nr_exti = fls(readl_relaxed(base + stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst));
> +		writel_relaxed(0, base + stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
> +
> +		pr_info("%s: bank%d, External IRQs available:%#x\n",
> +			node->full_name, i, irqs_mask);
> +	}
>  
>  	nr_irqs = of_irq_count(node);
>  	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
> @@ -198,4 +236,11 @@ static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct device_node *node,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -IRQCHIP_DECLARE(stm32_exti, "st,stm32-exti", stm32_exti_init);
> +static int __init stm32f4_exti_of_init(struct device_node *np,
> +				       struct device_node *parent)
> +{
> +	return stm32_exti_init(stm32f4xx_exti_banks,
> +			ARRAY_SIZE(stm32f4xx_exti_banks), np);
> +}
> +
> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(stm32f4_exti, "st,stm32-exti", stm32f4_exti_of_init);
> 

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/8] irqchip: stm32: add multi-bank management
  2017-08-07 13:21   ` Marc Zyngier
@ 2017-08-08  9:28     ` Ludovic BARRE
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic BARRE @ 2017-08-08  9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marc Zyngier, Thomas Gleixner, Jason Cooper
  Cc: Maxime Coquelin, Alexandre Torgue, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel

hi Marc

sorry for previous message in html
(recently, I've changed my laptop and forgot my setup for plain text) :-(

On 08/07/2017 03:21 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 07/07/17 08:26, Ludovic Barre wrote:
>> From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
>>
>> -prepare to manage multi-bank
>> -prepare to manage registers offset by compatible
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>   1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
>> index 491568c..308cef5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
>> @@ -14,27 +14,52 @@
>>   #include <linux/of_address.h>
>>   #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>>   
>> -#define EXTI_IMR	0x0
>> -#define EXTI_EMR	0x4
>> -#define EXTI_RTSR	0x8
>> -#define EXTI_FTSR	0xc
>> -#define EXTI_SWIER	0x10
>> -#define EXTI_PR		0x14
>> +struct stm32_exti_bank {
>> +	u32 imr_ofst;
>> +	u32 emr_ofst;
>> +	u32 rtsr_ofst;
>> +	u32 ftsr_ofst;
>> +	u32 swier_ofst;
>> +	u32 pr_ofst;
>> +
>> +	u32 irqs_mask;
>> +};
> 
> This looks weird. On one hand, you have a set of offsets that are
> typical of the HW, and yet you add to it a mask that is read from the HW
> (and not hardcoded like the rest).
oops,  It is a residue, (set in probe but not used)
So, I will remove irqs_mask, and adds a const

> 
>> +
>> +static struct stm32_exti_bank stm32f4xx_exti_b1 = {
>> +	.imr_ofst	= 0x00,
>> +	.emr_ofst	= 0x04,
>> +	.rtsr_ofst	= 0x08,
>> +	.ftsr_ofst	= 0x0C,
>> +	.swier_ofst	= 0x10,
>> +	.pr_ofst	= 0x14,
>> +};
> 
> And this prevents making this structure const, which it should be.
> 
>> +
>> +static struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32f4xx_exti_banks[] = {
>> +	&stm32f4xx_exti_b1,
>> +};
>>   
>>   static void stm32_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
>>   {
>>   	struct irq_domain *domain = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
>> -	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = domain->gc->gc[0];
>>   	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
>> +	unsigned int virq, nbanks = domain->gc->num_chips;
>> +	struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
>> +	struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank;
>>   	unsigned long pending;
>> -	int n;
>> +	int n, i, irq_base = 0;
>>   
>>   	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
>>   
>> -	while ((pending = irq_reg_readl(gc, EXTI_PR))) {
>> -		for_each_set_bit(n, &pending, BITS_PER_LONG) {
>> -			generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(domain, n));
>> -			irq_reg_writel(gc, BIT(n), EXTI_PR);
>> +	for (i = 0; i < nbanks; i++, irq_base += BITS_PER_LONG) {
> 
> Are you guaranteed that all the interrupts are organised in a linear
> way? No hole between them? Ever?
currently, Exti could manage up to N linear input events distributed in 
X banks of 32 events.
example H7 has 96 events => 3*32
There is no hole between the bank, but some inputs may not be connected 
(hardware design choice).

> 
>> +		gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(domain, irq_base);
>> +		stm32_bank = gc->private;
>> +
>> +		while ((pending = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->pr_ofst))) {
>> +			for_each_set_bit(n, &pending, BITS_PER_LONG) {
>> +				virq = irq_find_mapping(domain, irq_base + n);
>> +				generic_handle_irq(virq);
>> +				irq_reg_writel(gc, BIT(n), stm32_bank->pr_ofst);
> 
> This code doesn't look very good. Since you already have the bank as
> part of your gc structure, why don't you add a set of wrappers such as:
> 
> static void stm32_irq_write_pr(struct irq_chip_generic *gc, u32 val)
> {
> 	struct stm32_exti_bank *bank = gc->private;
> 	irq_reg_writel(gc, val, bank->pr_ofst);
> }
> 
> Nobody really want to know about this offset business, so just hide it
> as much as possible.
yes, you're right.  I will create a "stm32_exti_pending" and
"stm32_exti_irq_ack" functions

> 
>> +			}
>>   		}
>>   	}
>>   
>> @@ -44,13 +69,14 @@ static void stm32_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
>>   static int stm32_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
>>   {
>>   	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
>> -	int pin = data->hwirq;
>> +	struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank = gc->private;
>> +	int pin = data->hwirq % BITS_PER_LONG;
>>   	u32 rtsr, ftsr;
>>   
>>   	irq_gc_lock(gc);
>>   
>> -	rtsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, EXTI_RTSR);
>> -	ftsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, EXTI_FTSR);
>> +	rtsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
>> +	ftsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->ftsr_ofst);
>>   
>>   	switch (type) {
>>   	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
>> @@ -70,8 +96,8 @@ static int stm32_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	irq_reg_writel(gc, rtsr, EXTI_RTSR);
>> -	irq_reg_writel(gc, ftsr, EXTI_FTSR);
>> +	irq_reg_writel(gc, rtsr, stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
>> +	irq_reg_writel(gc, ftsr, stm32_bank->ftsr_ofst);
>>   
>>   	irq_gc_unlock(gc);
>>   
>> @@ -81,17 +107,18 @@ static int stm32_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
>>   static int stm32_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
>>   {
>>   	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
>> -	int pin = data->hwirq;
>> +	struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank = gc->private;
>> +	int pin = data->hwirq % BITS_PER_LONG;
>>   	u32 emr;
>>   
>>   	irq_gc_lock(gc);
>>   
>> -	emr = irq_reg_readl(gc, EXTI_EMR);
>> +	emr = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->emr_ofst);
>>   	if (on)
>>   		emr |= BIT(pin);
>>   	else
>>   		emr &= ~BIT(pin);
>> -	irq_reg_writel(gc, emr, EXTI_EMR);
>> +	irq_reg_writel(gc, emr, stm32_bank->emr_ofst);
>>   
>>   	irq_gc_unlock(gc);
>>   
>> @@ -101,11 +128,12 @@ static int stm32_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
>>   static int stm32_exti_alloc(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
>>   			    unsigned int nr_irqs, void *data)
>>   {
>> -	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = d->gc->gc[0];
>> +	struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
>>   	struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = data;
>>   	irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
>>   
>>   	hwirq = fwspec->param[0];
>> +	gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(d, hwirq);
>>   
>>   	irq_map_generic_chip(d, virq, hwirq);
>>   	irq_domain_set_info(d, virq, hwirq, &gc->chip_types->chip, gc,
>> @@ -129,8 +157,8 @@ struct irq_domain_ops irq_exti_domain_ops = {
>>   	.free	= stm32_exti_free,
>>   };
>>   
>> -static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct device_node *node,
>> -				  struct device_node *parent)
>> +static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct stm32_exti_bank **stm32_exti_banks,
>> +				  int bank_nr, struct device_node *node)
>>   {
>>   	unsigned int clr = IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE | IRQ_NOAUTOEN;
>>   	int nr_irqs, nr_exti, ret, i;
>> @@ -144,23 +172,16 @@ static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct device_node *node,
>>   		return -ENOMEM;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	/* Determine number of irqs supported */
>> -	writel_relaxed(~0UL, base + EXTI_RTSR);
>> -	nr_exti = fls(readl_relaxed(base + EXTI_RTSR));
>> -	writel_relaxed(0, base + EXTI_RTSR);
>> -
>> -	pr_info("%s: %d External IRQs detected\n", node->full_name, nr_exti);
>> -
>> -	domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, nr_exti,
>> +	domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, bank_nr * BITS_PER_LONG,
> 
> You used to size the domain with the number of *implemented* interrupts.
> Now, it becomes something else. Why is that so?
when there was only 32 events we could use number of implemented event,
anyway the 32 events was parsed in stm32_irq_handler.
Today the irq number allow to look up the appropriate bank

  Also, is BITS_PER_LONG
> the right macro? Shouldn't it be something like "IRQS_PER_BANK", or
> something similar? Just in case someone recycles this block on a 64bit
> CPU...
I just reuse "BITS_PER_LONG" used in stm32_irq_handler.
But yes, that make sense to change to IRQS_PER_BANK.

> 
>>   				       &irq_exti_domain_ops, NULL);
>>   	if (!domain) {
>>   		pr_err("%s: Could not register interrupt domain.\n",
>> -				node->name);
>> +		       node->name);
>>   		ret = -ENOMEM;
>>   		goto out_unmap;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	ret = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(domain, nr_exti, 1, "exti",
>> +	ret = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(domain, BITS_PER_LONG, 1, "exti",
> 
> And here, you're not multiplying it by the number of banks. Why?
The goal is to create one domain with "bank_nr" generic chips (for stm32 
h7: 1 domain with 3 gc).
irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips funtion set  dgc->num_chips = 
irqs_per_chip / domain size.
like this, each gc match with a bank (each gc has bank specification in 
gc->private = stm32_bank_N).
irq_get_domain_generic_chip allow to look up bank specification with 
"irq number" (see stm32_irq_handler).
I'm inspired of  irq-atmel-aic-common.c or irq-bcm7120-l2c

> 
>>   					     handle_edge_irq, clr, 0, 0);
>>   	if (ret) {
>>   		pr_err("%s: Could not allocate generic interrupt chip.\n",
>> @@ -168,18 +189,35 @@ static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct device_node *node,
>>   		goto out_free_domain;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	gc = domain->gc->gc[0];
>> -	gc->reg_base                         = base;
>> -	gc->chip_types->type               = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH;
>> -	gc->chip_types->chip.name          = gc->chip_types[0].chip.name;
>> -	gc->chip_types->chip.irq_ack       = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
>> -	gc->chip_types->chip.irq_mask      = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
>> -	gc->chip_types->chip.irq_unmask    = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
>> -	gc->chip_types->chip.irq_set_type  = stm32_irq_set_type;
>> -	gc->chip_types->chip.irq_set_wake  = stm32_irq_set_wake;
>> -	gc->chip_types->regs.ack           = EXTI_PR;
>> -	gc->chip_types->regs.mask          = EXTI_IMR;
>> -	gc->chip_types->handler            = handle_edge_irq;
>> +	for (i = 0; i < bank_nr; i++) {
>> +		struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank = stm32_exti_banks[i];
>> +		u32 irqs_mask;
>> +
>> +		gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(domain, i * BITS_PER_LONG);
>> +
>> +		gc->reg_base = base;
>> +		gc->chip_types->type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH;
>> +		gc->chip_types->chip.name = gc->chip_types[0].chip.name;
>> +		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
>> +		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
>> +		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
>> +		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_set_type = stm32_irq_set_type;
>> +		gc->chip_types->chip.irq_set_wake = stm32_irq_set_wake;
>> +		gc->chip_types->regs.ack = stm32_bank->pr_ofst;
>> +		gc->chip_types->regs.mask = stm32_bank->imr_ofst;
>> +		gc->chip_types->handler = handle_edge_irq;
>> +		gc->private = stm32_bank;
>> +
>> +		/* Determine number of irqs supported */
>> +		writel_relaxed(~0UL, base + stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
>> +		irqs_mask = readl_relaxed(base + stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
>> +		stm32_bank->irqs_mask = irqs_mask;
>> +		nr_exti = fls(readl_relaxed(base + stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst));
>> +		writel_relaxed(0, base + stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
>> +
>> +		pr_info("%s: bank%d, External IRQs available:%#x\n",
>> +			node->full_name, i, irqs_mask);
>> +	}
>>   
>>   	nr_irqs = of_irq_count(node);
>>   	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
>> @@ -198,4 +236,11 @@ static int __init stm32_exti_init(struct device_node *node,
>>   	return ret;
>>   }
>>   
>> -IRQCHIP_DECLARE(stm32_exti, "st,stm32-exti", stm32_exti_init);
>> +static int __init stm32f4_exti_of_init(struct device_node *np,
>> +				       struct device_node *parent)
>> +{
>> +	return stm32_exti_init(stm32f4xx_exti_banks,
>> +			ARRAY_SIZE(stm32f4xx_exti_banks), np);
>> +}
>> +
>> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(stm32f4_exti, "st,stm32-exti", stm32f4_exti_of_init);
>>
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	M.
> 

BR
Ludo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-08-08  9:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-07-07  7:26 [PATCH 0/8] irqchip: stm32: add stm32h7 support Ludovic Barre
2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 1/8] irqchip: stm32: select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP Ludovic Barre
2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 2/8] irqchip: stm32: add multi-bank management Ludovic Barre
2017-08-07 13:21   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-08  9:28     ` Ludovic BARRE
2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 3/8] dt-bindings: interrupt-controllers: add compatible string for stm32h7 Ludovic Barre
2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 4/8] irqchip: stm32: add stm32h7 support Ludovic Barre
2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 5/8] irqchip: stm32: fix initial values Ludovic Barre
2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 6/8] irqchip: stm32: move the wakeup on interrupt mask Ludovic Barre
2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 7/8] ARM: dts: stm32: add exti support for stm32h743 Ludovic Barre
2017-07-07  7:26 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM: dts: stm32: add support of exti on stm32h743 pinctrl Ludovic Barre
2017-07-07  8:16   ` Alexandre Torgue

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).