From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/26] Make reporting-bugs easier to grasp and yet more detailed
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 19:23:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1f71cf5a-4afb-22b5-c528-aeb026fc6ce9@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7910cf25-4aa9-e33d-704c-33ab91ab713b@leemhuis.info>
On 11/9/20 3:01 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Lo!
>
> Am 01.10.20 um 10:39 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis:
>> This series rewrites the "how to report bugs to the Linux kernel maintainers"
>> document to make it more straight forward and the essence easier to grasp. At
>> the same time make the text provide a lot more details about the process in form
>> of a reference section, so users that want or need to know them have them at
>> hand.
>>
>> The goal of this rewrite: improve the quality of the bug reports and reduce the
>> number of reports that get ignored. This was motivated by many reports of poor
>> quality the main author of the rewrite stumped upon when he was tracking
>> regressions.
>
> So, now that those weeks with the merge window, the OSS & ELC Europe, and this US election thing are behind us it seems like a good time to ask:
>
> How to move on with this?
>
> @Jon: I'd be really appreciate to hear your thoughts on this.
>
> @Randy: Thx again for all suggestions and pointing out many spelling mistakes, that helped a lot! You didn't reply to some of the patches, which made me wonder: did you not look at those (which is totally fine) or was there nothing to point out? And what I'd really like to know: what are you thinking about the whole thing?
Hi,
I looked at all of the patches in the series but did not have any comments
on the ones where I didn't reply.
thanks.
--
~Randy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-10 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-01 8:39 [RFC PATCH v1 00/26] Make reporting-bugs easier to grasp and yet more detailed Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/26] docs: reporting-bugs: temporary markers for licensing and diff reasons Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/26] docs: reporting-bugs: Create a TLDR how to report issues Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-02 2:32 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-03 7:27 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-11 15:24 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 3:33 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-12 4:56 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/26] docs: reporting-bugs: step-by-step guide on " Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-02 3:02 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-03 8:05 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/26] docs: reporting-bugs: step-by-step guide for issues in stable & longterm Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-02 3:25 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-03 8:24 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/26] docs: reporting-bugs: begin reference section providing details Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-02 16:49 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-03 8:27 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/26] docs: reporting-bugs: point out we only care about fresh vanilla kernels Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/26] docs: reporting-bugs: let users classify their issue Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-02 16:59 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-03 9:42 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/26] docs: reporting-bugs: make readers check the taint flag Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-02 17:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-03 9:56 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-03 17:47 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/26] docs: reporting-bugs: help users find the proper place for their report Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-04 4:03 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-07 12:05 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/26] docs: reporting-bugs: remind people to look for existing reports Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-02 17:17 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-03 9:58 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/26] docs: reporting-bugs: remind people to back up their data Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/26] docs: reporting-bugs: tell users to disable DKMS et al Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-02 17:28 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-03 9:59 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/26] docs: reporting-bugs: point out the environment might be causing issue Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-02 17:32 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-03 10:00 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/26] docs: reporting-bugs: make users write notes, one for each issue Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-02 17:35 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-03 10:01 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/26] docs: reporting-bugs: make readers test mainline, but leave a loophole Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-02 17:51 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-03 10:11 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-11 15:36 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 3:42 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-12 5:22 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/26] docs: reporting-bugs: let users check taint status again Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 17/26] docs: reporting-bugs: explain options if reproducing on mainline fails Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 18/26] docs: reporting-bugs: let users optimize their notes Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 19/26] docs: reporting-bugs: decode failure messages [need help] Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 20/26] docs: reporting-bugs: instructions for handling regressions Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-04 4:03 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-04 6:31 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 21/26] docs: reporting-bugs: details on writing and sending the report Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-09 2:45 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-09 7:38 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:50 ` [RFC PATCH v1 22/26] docs: reporting-bugs: explain what users should do once the report got out Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-09 17:37 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-11 13:29 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-11 15:06 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-01 8:50 ` [RFC PATCH v1 23/26] docs: reporting-bugs: details for issues specific to stable and longterm Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-09 18:42 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-11 13:29 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:50 ` [RFC PATCH v1 24/26] docs: reporting-bugs: explain why users might get neither reply nor fix Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-04 4:03 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-04 6:35 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:50 ` [RFC PATCH v1 25/26] docs: reporting-bugs: explain things could be easier Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-04 4:03 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-10-04 6:36 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-10-01 8:50 ` [RFC PATCH v1 26/26] docs: reporting-bugs: add SPDX tag and license hint, remove markers Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-09 11:01 ` [RFC PATCH v1 00/26] Make reporting-bugs easier to grasp and yet more detailed Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-09 18:21 ` Jonathan Corbet
2020-11-10 12:01 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-10 3:23 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1f71cf5a-4afb-22b5-c528-aeb026fc6ce9@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@leemhuis.info \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).