From: CaT <cat@zip.com.au>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use correct x86 reboot vector
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 13:35:04 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030510033504.GA1789@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030510025634.GA31713@averell>
On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 04:56:34AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Extensive discussion by various experts on the discuss@x86-64.org
> mailing list concluded that the correct vector to restart an 286+
> CPU is f000:fff0, not ffff:0000. Both seem to work on current systems,
> but the first is correct.
Could this bug, by any chance, cause a system to shutdown instead of
rebooting? This is what happens to me at the moment but not each and
every time.
--
Martin's distress was in contrast to the bitter satisfaction of some
of his fellow marines as they surveyed the scene. "The Iraqis are sick
people and we are the chemotherapy," said Corporal Ryan Dupre. "I am
starting to hate this country. Wait till I get hold of a friggin' Iraqi.
No, I won't get hold of one. I'll just kill him."
- http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article2479.htm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-10 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-10 2:56 [PATCH] Use correct x86 reboot vector Andi Kleen
2003-05-10 3:35 ` CaT [this message]
2003-05-10 3:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-05-10 14:49 ` Alan Cox
2003-05-10 16:17 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-05-10 18:47 ` Jos Hulzink
2003-05-11 18:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-05-11 17:24 ` Alan Cox
2003-05-11 19:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-05-12 5:48 ` [PATCH] always shutdown on the bootstrap processor Eric W. Biederman
2003-05-10 16:15 ` [PATCH] Use correct x86 reboot vector Jamie Lokier
2003-05-10 17:09 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-05-10 19:41 ` Jos Hulzink
2003-05-10 18:10 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-05-10 20:55 ` Jos Hulzink
2003-05-11 3:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-05-11 9:37 ` Jos Hulzink
2003-05-11 14:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-05-11 17:38 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-05-11 17:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-05-11 18:23 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-05-11 19:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-05-12 15:36 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-05-13 6:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-05-11 18:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-05-11 19:00 ` Matt Mackall
2003-05-11 19:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-05-12 1:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-05-11 19:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-05-11 18:43 ` Christer Weinigel
2003-05-11 20:22 ` wingel
2003-05-11 20:26 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-05-11 17:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-05-13 12:49 Chuck Ebbert
2003-05-13 18:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-05-13 19:04 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-05-13 19:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030510033504.GA1789@zip.com.au \
--to=cat@zip.com.au \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).