From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use correct x86 reboot vector
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 17:15:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030510161529.GB29271@mail.jlokier.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030510025634.GA31713@averell>
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Extensive discussion by various experts on the discuss@x86-64.org
> mailing list concluded that the correct vector to restart an 286+
> CPU is f000:fff0, not ffff:0000. Both seem to work on current systems,
> but the first is correct.
You are right. That's what a 286 does when the RESET signal is asserted.
Which is amazing, because I wrote that ffff:0000 and I was reading
from the Phoenix BIOS book at the time. It was long ago but I'm
fairly sure I got that address from the book.
I just did some Googling and found that there examples of DOS code
fragments using both vectors. Also, the original IBM BIOS (as they
say) had a long jump at the vector, which is presumably one of the
many de facto ABIs which real mode programmers grew to depend on.
> See the "DPMI on AMD64" and "Warm reboot for x86-64 linux" threads
> on http://www.x86-64.org/mailing_lists/list?listname=discuss&listnum=0
> for more details.
One would hope that AMD64 systems, being a new design and all, offer a
documented and reliable method of rebooting.
It should never be necessary to have to write "reboot=..." on the
kernel command line to choose which legacy method works on different
AMD64 motherboards. Am I too idealistic?
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-10 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-10 2:56 [PATCH] Use correct x86 reboot vector Andi Kleen
2003-05-10 3:35 ` CaT
2003-05-10 3:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-05-10 14:49 ` Alan Cox
2003-05-10 16:17 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-05-10 18:47 ` Jos Hulzink
2003-05-11 18:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-05-11 17:24 ` Alan Cox
2003-05-11 19:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-05-12 5:48 ` [PATCH] always shutdown on the bootstrap processor Eric W. Biederman
2003-05-10 16:15 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2003-05-10 17:09 ` [PATCH] Use correct x86 reboot vector Randy.Dunlap
2003-05-10 19:41 ` Jos Hulzink
2003-05-10 18:10 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-05-10 20:55 ` Jos Hulzink
2003-05-11 3:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-05-11 9:37 ` Jos Hulzink
2003-05-11 14:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-05-11 17:38 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-05-11 17:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-05-11 18:23 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-05-11 19:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-05-12 15:36 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-05-13 6:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-05-11 18:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-05-11 19:00 ` Matt Mackall
2003-05-11 19:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-05-12 1:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-05-11 19:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-05-11 18:43 ` Christer Weinigel
2003-05-11 20:22 ` wingel
2003-05-11 20:26 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-05-11 17:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-05-13 12:49 Chuck Ebbert
2003-05-13 18:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-05-13 19:04 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-05-13 19:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030510161529.GB29271@mail.jlokier.co.uk \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).