linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
To: Rory Browne <robro@frink.nuigalway.ie>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BK Licence: Protocols and Research
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 07:58:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030717145802.GC24697@work.bitmover.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030717120505.GA22304@zion.nuigalway.ie>

With apologies to the list for the off topic post (I'm really trying to
not annoy you guys but some stuff we can't let slide due to legalities).

On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:05:05PM +0100, Rory Browne wrote:
> Would the conduction of research(and publication of results of same) on 
> the bitkeeper formats/protocols, preclude users from using the Free version 
> of Bitkeeper, for the research project?

Yes, for the research project and/or anything else.

> Would the carrying out of such research using the free version of
> Bitkeeper, prevent them from developing a product which contains
> substantially similar capabilities of the BitKeeper Software in the
> Future, assuming that all copies of Bitkeeper were destroyed before the
> development started?

Yes.

> Would previous activity in the area of developing a product which
> contains substantially similary features to Bitkeeper preclude users from
> using the Free Bitkeeper software?

Yes.

Each question above can be restated as "Would it be OK if we used BK
in violation of its license?".  The answer is no and if you did that we
would be forced to come after you, if we don't and some large company did
the same thing we would have a much tougher time enforcing the license.
Trademarks and licenses tend to lose their value if you don't enforce
them.

Your questions indicate one of two things: you either have a burning
desire to work on BK itself or a burning desire to copy BK.  If it's
the former, that's easy, send us a resume and if you are a good engineer
we'll hire you, we need good engineers with a solid understanding of file
systems, distributed systems, graphs and sets, and/or human interfaces.

If you are trying to copy BK, give it up.  We'll simply follow in the
footsteps of every other company faced with this sort of thing and change
the protocol every 6 months.  Since you would be chasing us you can never
catch up.  If you managed to stay close then we'd put digital signatures
into the protocol to prevent your clone from interoperating with BK.

Instead of trying to copy our work in violation of our license, you'd be
far better served by doing some new work.  If you like SCM then either
work here, work on some other SCM unrelated to BK, or expect a costly
discussion with a lawyer.  I realize this is an unpopular position but
that's tough, it's our code and our license and you obey the rules
or suffer the consequences.  The license is a contract and it's an
enforceable contract, we have gone up against a company who spends more
on lawyers in a week than our annual gross revenues and successfully
enforced it.
-- 
---
Larry McVoy              lm at bitmover.com          http://www.bitmover.com/lm

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-07-17 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-17 12:05 Rory Browne
2003-07-17 12:15 ` Sean Neakums
2003-07-17 12:28 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-17 12:35 ` Jens Axboe
2003-07-17 13:39   ` Rory Browne
2003-07-17 14:09     ` Alan Cox
2003-07-17 14:58 ` Larry McVoy [this message]
2003-07-17 21:01   ` Rory Browne
2003-07-17 21:41     ` Mike Fedyk
2003-07-17 22:01     ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-18  3:01     ` jw schultz
2003-07-22 16:56   ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-22 20:15     ` Brian McGroarty
2003-07-22 20:23       ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-17 14:17 John Bradford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030717145802.GC24697@work.bitmover.com \
    --to=lm@bitmover.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robro@frink.nuigalway.ie \
    --subject='Re: BK Licence: Protocols and Research' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).