From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@hotpop.com>
To: linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
adaplas@pol.net,
Linux Fbdev development list
<linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: [PATCH] fbdev: Fix IO access in rivafb
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 20:00:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200411132000.31465.adaplas@hotpop.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041113112234.GA5523@bogon.ms20.nix>
On Saturday 13 November 2004 19:22, Guido Guenther wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 12:39:32PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 20:18 +0100, Guido Guenther wrote:
> In 2.6.10-rc1-mm5 {in,out}_8 and read/writeb are exactly identical, only
> __raw_{read,write}b is different. So you mean __raw_{read,write}b in the
> above? (no nitpicking, just want to be sure I understand this
> correctly).
Why not use in_be* and out_be* for __raw_read and raw_write? If I
understand correctly, they also have barriers. Or would that hurt
performance?
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-13 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200411080521.iA85LbG6025914@hera.kernel.org>
2004-11-08 5:57 ` [PATCH] fbdev: Fix IO access in rivafb Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-08 8:33 ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] " Antonino A. Daplas
2004-11-08 21:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-08 22:18 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2004-11-08 9:06 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2004-11-08 9:55 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-11-08 15:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-08 20:02 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2004-11-08 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-08 22:08 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2004-11-08 22:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-12 12:51 ` Guido Guenther
2004-11-12 16:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-12 19:18 ` Guido Guenther
2004-11-12 19:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-13 12:57 ` Guido Guenther
2004-11-13 1:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-13 11:22 ` Guido Guenther
2004-11-13 12:00 ` Antonino A. Daplas [this message]
2004-11-13 13:02 ` Guido Guenther
2004-11-13 18:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-11-13 21:29 ` Antonino A. Daplas
2004-11-13 22:54 ` Guido Guenther
2004-11-13 23:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-13 23:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-13 12:20 ` Yasushi SHOJI
2004-11-19 1:48 ` readl/writel: swap or not to swap (was: [PATCH] fbdev: Fix IO access in rivafb) Yasushi SHOJI
2004-11-19 4:09 ` readl/writel: swap or not to swap Jeff Garzik
2004-11-19 7:24 ` Yasushi SHOJI
2004-11-08 21:52 ` [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: [PATCH] fbdev: Fix IO access in rivafb Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-11-08 23:07 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2004-11-13 23:22 ` Guido Guenther
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200411132000.31465.adaplas@hotpop.com \
--to=adaplas@hotpop.com \
--cc=adaplas@pol.net \
--cc=agx@sigxcpu.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).