linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Oren Laadan <orenl@cs.columbia.edu>,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/4] checkpoint-restart: general infrastructure
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:03:15 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080811120315.4b3ba2c8@bike.lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080807224034.735B1F84@kernel>

I'm trying to figure out this patch set...here's a few things which
have caught my eye in passing.

> +/**
> + * cr_get_fname - return pathname of a given file
> + * @file: file pointer
> + * @buf: buffer for pathname
> + * @n: buffer length (in) and pathname length (out)
> + *
> + * if the buffer provivded by the caller is too small, allocate a new
> + * buffer; caller should call cr_put_pathname() for cleanup
> + */
> +char *cr_get_fname(struct path *path, struct path *root, char *buf,
> int *n) +{
> +	char *fname;
> +
> +	fname = __d_path(path, root, buf, *n);
> +
> +	if (IS_ERR(fname) && PTR_ERR(fname) == -ENAMETOOLONG) {
> +		 if (!(buf = (char *) __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 0)))

This seems like a clunky and error-prone interface - why not just have it
allocate the memory always?  But, in this case, cr_get_fname() always seems
to be called with ctx->tbuf, which, in turn, is an order-1 allocation.
Here you're saying that if it's too small, you'll try replacing it with an
order-0 allocation instead.  I rather suspect that's not going to help.

> +/* write the checkpoint header */
> +static int cr_write_hdr(struct cr_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +	struct cr_hdr h;
> +	struct cr_hdr_head *hh = ctx->tbuf;
> +	struct timeval ktv;
> +
> +	h.type = CR_HDR_HEAD;
> +	h.len = sizeof(*hh);
> +	h.id = 0;
> +
> +	do_gettimeofday(&ktv);
> +
> +	hh->magic = 0x00a2d200;

This magic number is hard-coded in a number of places.  Could it maybe
benefit from a macro, which, in turn, could maybe end up in linux/magic.h?

> +/* dump the task_struct of a given task */
> +static int cr_write_task_struct(struct cr_ctx *ctx, struct task_struct *t)

This function is going to break every time somebody changes struct
task_struct.  I'm not quite sure how to prevent that.  I wonder if the
modversions stuff could somehow be employed to detect changes and make the
build fail?

> +/**
> + * sys_checkpoint - checkpoint a container
> + * @pid: pid of the container init(1) process
> + * @fd: file to which dump the checkpoint image
> + * @flags: checkpoint operation flags
> + */
> +asmlinkage long sys_checkpoint(pid_t pid, int fd, unsigned long
> flags) +{
> +	struct cr_ctx *ctx;
> +	struct file *file;
> +	int fput_needed;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> +		return -EPERM;

Like others, I wondered why CAP_SYS_ADMIN was required here.  I *still*
wonder, though, how you'll ever be able to do restart without a privilege
check.  There must be a thousand ways to compromise a system by messing
with the checkpoint file.

> +	file = fget_light(fd, &fput_needed);
> +	if (!file)
> +		return -EBADF;

Should you maybe check for write access?  An attempt to overwrite a
read-only file won't succeed, but you could save a lot of work by just
failing it with a clear code here.  

What about the file position?  Perhaps there could be a good reason to
checkpoint a process into the middle of a file, don't know.

In general, I don't see a whole lot of locking going on.  Is it really
possible to save and restore memory without ever holding mmap_sem?

jon

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-08-11 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-07 22:40 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] kernel-based checkpoint restart Dave Hansen
2008-08-07 22:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] checkpoint-restart: general infrastructure Dave Hansen
2008-08-08  9:46   ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-08 18:50     ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-08 20:59       ` Oren Laadan
2008-08-08 22:17         ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-08 23:27           ` Oren Laadan
2008-08-08 22:23         ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-14  8:09         ` [Devel] " Pavel Emelyanov
2008-08-14 15:16           ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-08 22:13       ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-08 22:26         ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-08 22:39           ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-09  0:43             ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-09  6:37               ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-09 13:39                 ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-11 15:07           ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-08-11 15:25             ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-14  5:53             ` Pavel Machek
2008-08-14 15:12               ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-20 21:40               ` Oren Laadan
2008-08-11 15:22         ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-08-11 16:53           ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-11 17:11             ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-11 19:48             ` checkpoint/restart ABI Dave Hansen
2008-08-11 21:47               ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-11 23:14                 ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-08-11 23:23                   ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-21  5:56                 ` Oren Laadan
2008-08-21  8:43                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-21 15:43                     ` Oren Laadan
2008-08-11 21:54               ` Oren Laadan
2008-08-11 23:38               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-11 23:54                 ` Peter Chubb
2008-08-12 14:49                   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-08-28 23:40                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-08-12 15:11                   ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-12 14:58                 ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-12 16:32                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-12 16:46                     ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-12 17:04                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-20 21:52                         ` Oren Laadan
2008-08-20 21:54                       ` Oren Laadan
2008-08-20 22:11                         ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-11 18:03   ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
2008-08-11 18:38     ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] checkpoint-restart: general infrastructure Dave Hansen
2008-08-12  3:44       ` Oren Laadan
2008-08-18  9:26   ` [Devel] " Pavel Emelyanov
2008-08-20 19:10     ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-07 22:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] checkpoint/restart: x86 support Dave Hansen
2008-08-08 12:09   ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-08 20:28     ` Oren Laadan
2008-08-08 22:29       ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-08 23:04         ` Oren Laadan
2008-08-09  0:38           ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-09  1:20             ` Oren Laadan
2008-08-09  2:20               ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-09  2:35                 ` Oren Laadan
2008-08-10 14:55             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-11 15:36               ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-11 16:07                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-09  6:43           ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-07 22:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] checkpoint/restart: memory management Dave Hansen
2008-08-08 12:12   ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-07 22:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] introduce sys_checkpoint and sys_restore Dave Hansen
2008-08-08 12:15   ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-08 20:33     ` Oren Laadan
2008-08-08  9:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] kernel-based checkpoint restart Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-08 18:06   ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-08 18:18     ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-08 19:44   ` Oren Laadan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080811120315.4b3ba2c8@bike.lwn.net \
    --to=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=orenl@cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).