linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Aswin Chandramouleeswaran\"" <aswin@hp.com>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
	will@willdeacon.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/4] Introducing a queue read/write lock implementation
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:44:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140130154400.GB5126@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140130151715.GA5126@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 04:17:15PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/qrwlock.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +#ifndef _ASM_X86_QRWLOCK_H
> +#define _ASM_X86_QRWLOCK_H
> +
> +#include <asm-generic/qrwlock_types.h>
> +
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_X86_OOSTORE) && !defined(CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE)
> +#define queue_write_unlock queue_write_unlock
> +static inline void queue_write_unlock(struct qrwlock *lock)
> +{
> +        barrier();
> +        ACCESS_ONCE(*(u8 *)&lock->cnts) = 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +#include <asm-generic/qrwlock.h>
> +
> +#endif /* _ASM_X86_QRWLOCK_H */
> +

> +/**
> + * queue_read_unlock - release read lock of a queue rwlock
> + * @lock : Pointer to queue rwlock structure
> + */
> +static inline void queue_read_unlock(struct qrwlock *lock)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Atomically decrement the reader count
> +	 */
> +	smp_mb__before_atomic_dec();
> +	atomic_sub(_QR_BIAS, &lock->cnts);
> +}
> +
> +#ifndef queue_write_unlock
> +/**
> + * queue_write_unlock - release write lock of a queue rwlock
> + * @lock : Pointer to queue rwlock structure
> + */
> +static inline void queue_write_unlock(struct qrwlock *lock)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * If the writer field is atomic, it can be cleared directly.
> +	 * Otherwise, an atomic subtraction will be used to clear it.
> +	 */
> +	smp_mb__before_atomic_dec();
> +	atomic_sub(_QW_LOCKED, &lock->cnts);
> +}
> +#endif


Something like this would work for ARM and PPC, although I didn't do the
PPC variant of atomic_sub_release().


--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h
@@ -90,6 +90,21 @@ static inline void atomic_sub(int i, ato
 	: "cc");
 }
 
+static inline void atomic_sub_release(int i, atomic_t *v)
+{
+	unsigned long tmp;
+	int result;
+
+	asm volatile("// atomic_sub\n"
+"1:	ldxr	%w0, %2\n"
+"	sub	%w0, %w0, %w3\n"
+"	stlxr	%w1, %w0, %2\n"
+"	cbnz	%w1, 1b"
+	: "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp), "+Q" (v->counter)
+	: "Ir" (i)
+	: "cc");
+}
+
 static inline int atomic_sub_return(int i, atomic_t *v)
 {
 	unsigned long tmp;
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/qrwlock.h
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#ifndef _ASM_ARM64_QRWLOCK_H
+#define _ASM_ARM64_QRWLOCK_H
+
+#include <asm-generic/qrwlock_types.h>
+
+#define queue_read_unlock queue_read_unlock
+static inline void queue_read_unlock(struct qrwlock *lock)
+{
+	atomic_sub_release(_QR_BIAS, &lock->cnts);
+}
+
+#define queue_write_unlock queue_write_unlock
+static inline void queue_write_unlock(struct qrwlock *lock)
+{
+	atomic_sub_release(_QW_LOCKED, &lock->cnts);
+}
+
+#include <asm-generic/qrwlock.h>
+
+#endif /* _ASM_ARM64_QRWLOCK_H */
+
--- a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ static inline void queue_write_lock(stru
 	queue_write_lock_slowpath(lock);
 }
 
+#ifndef queue_read_unlock
 /**
  * queue_read_unlock - release read lock of a queue rwlock
  * @lock : Pointer to queue rwlock structure
@@ -134,6 +135,7 @@ static inline void queue_read_unlock(str
 	smp_mb__before_atomic_dec();
 	atomic_sub(_QR_BIAS, &lock->cnts);
 }
+#endif
 
 #ifndef queue_write_unlock
 /**

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-30 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-24  4:28 [PATCH v11 0/4] Introducing a queue read/write lock implementation Waiman Long
2014-01-24  4:28 ` [PATCH v11 1/4] qrwlock: A " Waiman Long
2014-01-24  8:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-25  4:39     ` Waiman Long
2014-01-24  4:28 ` [PATCH v11 2/4] qrwlock, x86: Enable x86 to use queue read/write lock Waiman Long
2014-01-24  4:28 ` [PATCH v11 3/4] qrwlock, x86: Add char and short as atomic data type in x86 Waiman Long
2014-01-24  4:28 ` [PATCH v11 4/4] qrwlock: Use the mcs_spinlock helper functions for MCS queuing Waiman Long
2014-01-24  8:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-25  4:30     ` Waiman Long
2014-01-30 13:04 ` [PATCH v11 0/4] Introducing a queue read/write lock implementation Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 15:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 15:43     ` Waiman Long
2014-01-30 15:50       ` Waiman Long
2014-01-30 15:53         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 15:44     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-01-30 17:52       ` Will Deacon
2014-01-30 18:05         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 18:11           ` Will Deacon
2014-01-30 18:16             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-31  9:26     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-31 10:03       ` George Spelvin
2014-01-31 10:17         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-31 11:30           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-01 23:22           ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-31 18:59       ` Waiman Long
2014-01-31 19:47         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-01 10:38           ` George Spelvin
2014-01-31 20:14         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-31 21:09           ` Waiman Long
2014-02-01  1:29             ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-02-02  9:03             ` Ingo Molnar
2014-02-03 11:38               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-06  3:08               ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140130154400.GB5126@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=aswin@hp.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@horizon.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    --cc=will@willdeacon.co.uk \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).