linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>
Cc: Waiman.Long@hp.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	andi@firstfloor.org, arnd@arndb.de, aswin@hp.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, riel@redhat.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, scott.norton@hp.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	walken@google.com, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/4] Introducing a queue read/write lock implementation
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:17:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140131101729.GA8874@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140131100348.8867.qmail@science.horizon.com>

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 05:03:48AM -0500, George Spelvin wrote:
> How about getting rid of that TICKET_MSB mess and doing something like:
> 
> #define TICKET_MASK	0xFFFF
> 
> static inline void ticket_spin_unlock(atomic_t *tickets)
> {
> 	u32 t = *tickets;
> 
> 	smp_mb__before_atomic_inc();
> 
> 	/* Increment the low 16 bits without affecting the upper. */
> 	if (unlikely((~t & TICKET_MASK) == 0))
> 		atomic_add(-(atomic_t)TICKET_MASK, tickets);
> 	else
> 		atomic_inc(tickets);
> }
> 
> That also allows up to 2^16 waiters, up from 2^15.
> (Minus one on both cases, if you want to be fussy.)

Ah indeed. That'll work. That said, any arch that can single-copy
address shorts can probably do better than this generic atomic_t thing.

My main point was that we should seriously look at a ticket lock instead
of the MCS one, because while the MCS has better contention behaviour,
we shouldn't optimize locks for the worst contention.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-31 10:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-24  4:28 [PATCH v11 0/4] Introducing a queue read/write lock implementation Waiman Long
2014-01-24  4:28 ` [PATCH v11 1/4] qrwlock: A " Waiman Long
2014-01-24  8:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-25  4:39     ` Waiman Long
2014-01-24  4:28 ` [PATCH v11 2/4] qrwlock, x86: Enable x86 to use queue read/write lock Waiman Long
2014-01-24  4:28 ` [PATCH v11 3/4] qrwlock, x86: Add char and short as atomic data type in x86 Waiman Long
2014-01-24  4:28 ` [PATCH v11 4/4] qrwlock: Use the mcs_spinlock helper functions for MCS queuing Waiman Long
2014-01-24  8:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-25  4:30     ` Waiman Long
2014-01-30 13:04 ` [PATCH v11 0/4] Introducing a queue read/write lock implementation Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 15:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 15:43     ` Waiman Long
2014-01-30 15:50       ` Waiman Long
2014-01-30 15:53         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 15:44     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 17:52       ` Will Deacon
2014-01-30 18:05         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 18:11           ` Will Deacon
2014-01-30 18:16             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-31  9:26     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-31 10:03       ` George Spelvin
2014-01-31 10:17         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-01-31 11:30           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-01 23:22           ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-31 18:59       ` Waiman Long
2014-01-31 19:47         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-01 10:38           ` George Spelvin
2014-01-31 20:14         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-31 21:09           ` Waiman Long
2014-02-01  1:29             ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-02-02  9:03             ` Ingo Molnar
2014-02-03 11:38               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-06  3:08               ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140131101729.GA8874@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=aswin@hp.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@horizon.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).