linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Cc: lizefan@huawei.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	richard@nod.at, "Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] cgroups: allow a cgroup subsystem to reject a fork
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:48:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150424154830.GD24029@htj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOviyajrizKYCbSZZU0BzYeH_8A62_vq1zyzJ-z7=qBV+owWSg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:59:31PM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> >> +#define CGROUP_PREFORK_COUNT 0
> >> +
> >>  static inline int cgroup_init_early(void) { return 0; }
> >>  static inline int cgroup_init(void) { return 0; }
> >>  static inline void cgroup_fork(struct task_struct *p) {}
> >> -static inline void cgroup_post_fork(struct task_struct *p) {}
> >> +static inline int cgroup_can_fork(struct task_struct *p,
> >> +                               void *s[CGROUP_PREFORK_COUNT])
> >> +{
> >> +     return 0;
> >> +}
> >
> > Style consistency?
> 
> It's because it wraps. I can move it to be something like:
> 
> static inline int cgroup_can_fork(struct task_struct *p,
>                                void *s[CGROUP_PREFORK_COUNT])
>                                { return 0; }

static inline int cgroup_can_fork(struct task_struct *p,
				  void *s[CGROUP_PREFORK_COUNT])
{ return 0; }

> >> @@ -2078,6 +2084,18 @@ static void cgroup_task_migrate(struct cgroup *old_cgrp,
> >>       list_move_tail(&tsk->cg_list, &new_cset->mg_tasks);
> >>
> >>       /*
> >> +      * We detach from the old_cset subsystems here. We must do this
> >> +      * before we drop the refcount for old_cset, in order to make sure
> >> +      * that nobody frees it underneath us.
> >> +      */
> >> +     for_each_e_css(css, i, old_cgrp) {
> >> +             struct cgroup_subsys_state *old_css = old_cset->subsys[i];
> >> +
> >> +             if (old_css->ss->detach)
> >> +                     old_css->ss->detach(old_css, tsk);
> >> +     }
> >
> > I don't get this.  What can ->detach do that ->can_attach cannot?
> 
> ->detach signifies that a task is being migrated away from a cgroup.
> On second thought, we could just use task_css() on each task in the
> tset to figure out what the cgroup the task is being migrated away
> from is and just uncharge that inside ->can_attach.

Yeah, that's how it's supposed to be used.  You have access to both
pre and post csses before migration and only to the new ones once by
the time ->attach() is running.

> On the same point, are all the tasks in a tset passed to ->can_attach
> guaranteed to have the same css? Or do I have to uncharge each one
> individually?

They're the same.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-24 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-19 12:22 [PATCH v10 0/4] cgroups: add pids subsystem Aleksa Sarai
2015-04-19 12:22 ` [PATCH v10 1/4] cgroups: use bitmask to filter for_each_subsys Aleksa Sarai
2015-04-22 15:25   ` Tejun Heo
2015-04-22 15:42     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-22 16:02       ` Tejun Heo
2015-04-26 16:05         ` Aleksa Sarai
2015-04-26 16:09           ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-13  5:44             ` Aleksa Sarai
2015-05-13 13:50               ` Tejun Heo
2015-04-22 15:30   ` Tejun Heo
2015-04-19 12:22 ` [PATCH v10 2/4] cgroups: replace explicit ss_mask checking with for_each_subsys_which Aleksa Sarai
2015-04-22 15:31   ` Tejun Heo
2015-04-19 12:22 ` [PATCH v10 3/4] cgroups: allow a cgroup subsystem to reject a fork Aleksa Sarai
2015-04-22 15:54   ` Tejun Heo
2015-04-24 13:59     ` Aleksa Sarai
2015-04-24 15:48       ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2015-05-14 10:57     ` Aleksa Sarai
2015-05-14 15:08       ` Tejun Heo
2015-04-19 12:22 ` [PATCH v10 4/4] cgroups: implement the PIDs subsystem Aleksa Sarai
2015-04-22 16:29   ` Tejun Heo
2015-04-23  0:43     ` Aleksa Sarai
2015-04-24 15:36       ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-13 17:04         ` Aleksa Sarai
2015-05-13 17:29           ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-13 17:44             ` Aleksa Sarai
2015-05-13 17:47               ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-16  3:59                 ` Aleksa Sarai
2015-05-18  1:24                   ` Tejun Heo
2015-04-24 14:24     ` Aleksa Sarai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150424154830.GD24029@htj.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).