linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: "matthew r. wilcox" <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>,
	linda.knippers@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: regression introduced by "block: Add support for DAX reads/writes to block devices"
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 08:01:13 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150805220113.GC3902@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49k2t9ij43.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>

On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 04:19:08PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Hi, Matthew,
> 
> Linda Knippers noticed that commit (bbab37ddc20b) breaks mkfs.xfs:
> 
> # mkfs -t xfs -f /dev/pmem0
> meta-data=/dev/pmem0             isize=256    agcount=4, agsize=524288 blks
>          =                       sectsz=512   attr=2, projid32bit=1
>          =                       crc=0        finobt=0
> data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=2097152, imaxpct=25
>          =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
> naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0 ftype=0
> log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=2560, version=2
>          =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
> realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0
> mkfs.xfs: read failed: Numerical result out of range
> 
> I sat down with Linda to look into it, and the problem is that mkfs.xfs
> sets the blocksize of the device to 512 (via BLKBSZSET), and then reads
> from the last sector of the device.  This results in dax_io trying to do
> a page-sized I/O at 512 bytes from the end of the device.

Right - we have to be able to do IO to that last sector, so this is
a sanity check to tell if the block dev is large enough. The XFS
kernel code does the same end-of-device sector read when the
filesystem is mounted, too.

> bdev_direct_access, receiving this bogus pos/size combo, returns
> -ERANGE:
> 
> 	if ((sector + DIV_ROUND_UP(size, 512)) >
> 					part_nr_sects_read(bdev->bd_part))
> 		return -ERANGE;
> 
> Given that file systems supporting dax refuse to mount with a blocksize
> != page size, I'm guessing this is sort of expected behavior.  However,
> we really shouldn't be breaking direct I/O on pmem devices.

If the device is advertising 512 byte sector size support, then this
needs to work, especially as DAX is completely transparent on the
block device. Remember that DAX through a filesystem works on
filesystem data block size boundaries, so a 512 byte sector/4k block
size filesystem will be able to use DAX for mmapped files just fine.

> So, what do you want to do?  We could make the pmem device's logical
> block size fixed at the sytem page size.  Or, we could modify the dax
> code to work with blocksize < pagesize.  Or, we could continue using the
> direct I/O codepath for direct block device access.  What do you think?

I don't know how the pmem device sets up it's limits. Can you post
the output of:

	/sys/block/pmem0/queue/logical_block_size
	/sys/block/pmem0/queue/physical_block_size
	/sys/block/pmem0/queue/hw_sector_size
	/sys/block/pmem0/queue/minimum_io_size
	/sys/block/pmem0/queue/optimal_io_size

As these all affect how mkfs.xfs configures the filesystem being
made and so influences the size and alignment of the IO is does....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-05 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-05 20:19 regression introduced by "block: Add support for DAX reads/writes to block devices" Jeff Moyer
2015-08-05 22:01 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2015-08-06  1:42   ` Linda Knippers
2015-08-06  3:24     ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-06  7:52       ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-08-06 20:34         ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-09  8:52           ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-08-10 16:32             ` Linda Knippers
2015-08-10 21:27               ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-10 23:04                 ` Linda Knippers
2015-08-06 14:21 ` Wilcox, Matthew R
2015-08-06 15:33   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-06 15:51     ` Wilcox, Matthew R
2015-08-06 21:30   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-07 18:11     ` Wilcox, Matthew R
2015-08-07 20:41       ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-10  7:42         ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-08-12 21:11           ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-13  5:32             ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-08-13 14:00               ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-13 16:42                 ` Linda Knippers
2015-08-13 17:14                   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-13 17:52                     ` Linda Knippers
2015-08-13 18:19                       ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-13 19:32                         ` Wilcox, Matthew R
2015-08-14 16:28                           ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150805220113.GC3902@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linda.knippers@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).