linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hp.com>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
	"matthew r. wilcox" <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Subject: Re: regression introduced by "block: Add support for DAX reads/writes to block devices"
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 07:27:28 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150810212728.GJ3902@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55C8D208.1070903@hp.com>

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:32:08PM -0400, Linda Knippers wrote:
> On 8/9/2015 4:52 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > On 08/06/2015 11:34 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 10:52:47AM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> >>> On 08/06/2015 06:24 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 09:42:54PM -0400, Linda Knippers wrote:
> >>>>> On 08/05/2015 06:01 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >>>>>> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 04:19:08PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> >>> <>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I sat down with Linda to look into it, and the problem is that mkfs.xfs
> >>>>>>> sets the blocksize of the device to 512 (via BLKBSZSET), and then reads
> >>>>>>> from the last sector of the device.  This results in dax_io trying to do
> >>>>>>> a page-sized I/O at 512 bytes from the end of the device.
> >>>>>>
> >>>
> >>> This part I do not understand. how is mkfs.xfs reading the sector?
> >>> Is it through open(/dev/pmem0,...) ? O_DIRECT?
> >>
> >> mkfs.xfs uses O_DIRECT. Only if open(O_DIRECT) fails or mkfs.xfs is
> >> told that it is working on an image file does it fall back to
> >> buffered IO. All of the XFS userspace tools work this way to prevent
> >> page cache pollution issues with read-once or write-once data during
> >> operation.
....
> That patch does cause 'mkfs -t xfs' to work.
> 
> Before:
> $ sudo mkfs -t xfs -f /dev/pmem3
> meta-data=/dev/pmem3             isize=256    agcount=4, agsize=524288 blks
>          =                       sectsz=512   attr=2, projid32bit=1
                                   ^^^^^^^^^^
....

> $ sudo mkfs -t xfs -f /dev/pmem3
> meta-data=/dev/pmem3             isize=256    agcount=4, agsize=524288 blks
>          =                       sectsz=4096  attr=2, projid32bit=1
                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^

So in the after case, mkfs.xfs is behaving differently and not
exercising the bug. It's seen the:

> $ cat /sys/block/pmem3/queue/logical_block_size
> 512
> $ cat /sys/block/pmem3/queue/physical_block_size
> 4096
  ^^^^

4k physical block size, and hence configured the filesystem with a
4k sector size so all IO it issues is physicallly aligned. IOWs,
mkfs.xfs's last sector read is 4k aligned and sized, and therefore
the test has not confirmed that the patch fixes the 512 byte last
sector read is fixed at all.

Isn't there a regression test suite that covers basic block device
functionality that you can use to test these simple corner cases?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-10 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-05 20:19 regression introduced by "block: Add support for DAX reads/writes to block devices" Jeff Moyer
2015-08-05 22:01 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-06  1:42   ` Linda Knippers
2015-08-06  3:24     ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-06  7:52       ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-08-06 20:34         ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-09  8:52           ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-08-10 16:32             ` Linda Knippers
2015-08-10 21:27               ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2015-08-10 23:04                 ` Linda Knippers
2015-08-06 14:21 ` Wilcox, Matthew R
2015-08-06 15:33   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-06 15:51     ` Wilcox, Matthew R
2015-08-06 21:30   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-07 18:11     ` Wilcox, Matthew R
2015-08-07 20:41       ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-10  7:42         ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-08-12 21:11           ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-13  5:32             ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-08-13 14:00               ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-13 16:42                 ` Linda Knippers
2015-08-13 17:14                   ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-13 17:52                     ` Linda Knippers
2015-08-13 18:19                       ` Jeff Moyer
2015-08-13 19:32                         ` Wilcox, Matthew R
2015-08-14 16:28                           ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150810212728.GJ3902@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=boaz@plexistor.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linda.knippers@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).