linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] sctp: Remove some redundant code
@ 2016-09-04  9:38 Christophe JAILLET
  2016-09-05 12:40 ` marcelo.leitner
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Christophe JAILLET @ 2016-09-04  9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: marcelo.leitner, vyasevich, nhorman, davem
  Cc: linux-sctp, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors, Christophe JAILLET

In commit 311b21774f13 ("sctp: simplify sk_receive_queue locking"), a call
to 'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' has been made explicit. Previously it was
hidden in 'sctp_skb_list_tail()'

Now, the code around it looks redundant. The '_init()' part of
'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' should alreday do the same.

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
---
Un-tested
---
 net/sctp/ulpqueue.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c b/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c
index 877e55066f89..84d0fdaf7de9 100644
--- a/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c
+++ b/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c
@@ -140,11 +140,8 @@ int sctp_clear_pd(struct sock *sk, struct sctp_association *asoc)
 		 * we can go ahead and clear out the lobby in one shot
 		 */
 		if (!skb_queue_empty(&sp->pd_lobby)) {
-			struct list_head *list;
 			skb_queue_splice_tail_init(&sp->pd_lobby,
 						   &sk->sk_receive_queue);
-			list = (struct list_head *)&sctp_sk(sk)->pd_lobby;
-			INIT_LIST_HEAD(list);
 			return 1;
 		}
 	} else {
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sctp: Remove some redundant code
  2016-09-04  9:38 [PATCH] sctp: Remove some redundant code Christophe JAILLET
@ 2016-09-05 12:40 ` marcelo.leitner
  2016-09-05 23:48 ` marcelo.leitner
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: marcelo.leitner @ 2016-09-05 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe JAILLET
  Cc: vyasevich, nhorman, davem, linux-sctp, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors

On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 11:38:13AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> In commit 311b21774f13 ("sctp: simplify sk_receive_queue locking"), a call
> to 'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' has been made explicit. Previously it was
> hidden in 'sctp_skb_list_tail()'
> 
> Now, the code around it looks redundant. The '_init()' part of
> 'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' should alreday do the same.

Nice

> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> ---
> Un-tested

Okay. It seems good to me but I'll give this a run after lunch anyway.
Thanks

> ---
>  net/sctp/ulpqueue.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c b/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c
> index 877e55066f89..84d0fdaf7de9 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c
> @@ -140,11 +140,8 @@ int sctp_clear_pd(struct sock *sk, struct sctp_association *asoc)
>  		 * we can go ahead and clear out the lobby in one shot
>  		 */
>  		if (!skb_queue_empty(&sp->pd_lobby)) {
> -			struct list_head *list;
>  			skb_queue_splice_tail_init(&sp->pd_lobby,
>  						   &sk->sk_receive_queue);
> -			list = (struct list_head *)&sctp_sk(sk)->pd_lobby;
> -			INIT_LIST_HEAD(list);
>  			return 1;
>  		}
>  	} else {
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sctp: Remove some redundant code
  2016-09-04  9:38 [PATCH] sctp: Remove some redundant code Christophe JAILLET
  2016-09-05 12:40 ` marcelo.leitner
@ 2016-09-05 23:48 ` marcelo.leitner
  2016-09-07 15:19 ` Neil Horman
  2016-09-15 17:34 ` Marcelo
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: marcelo.leitner @ 2016-09-05 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe JAILLET
  Cc: vyasevich, nhorman, davem, linux-sctp, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors

On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 11:38:13AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> In commit 311b21774f13 ("sctp: simplify sk_receive_queue locking"), a call
> to 'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' has been made explicit. Previously it was
> hidden in 'sctp_skb_list_tail()'
> 
> Now, the code around it looks redundant. The '_init()' part of
> 'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' should alreday do the same.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> ---
> Un-tested

Tested here with some netperf combinations, seems good.
Thanks

Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>

> ---
>  net/sctp/ulpqueue.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c b/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c
> index 877e55066f89..84d0fdaf7de9 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c
> @@ -140,11 +140,8 @@ int sctp_clear_pd(struct sock *sk, struct sctp_association *asoc)
>  		 * we can go ahead and clear out the lobby in one shot
>  		 */
>  		if (!skb_queue_empty(&sp->pd_lobby)) {
> -			struct list_head *list;
>  			skb_queue_splice_tail_init(&sp->pd_lobby,
>  						   &sk->sk_receive_queue);
> -			list = (struct list_head *)&sctp_sk(sk)->pd_lobby;
> -			INIT_LIST_HEAD(list);
>  			return 1;
>  		}
>  	} else {
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sctp: Remove some redundant code
  2016-09-04  9:38 [PATCH] sctp: Remove some redundant code Christophe JAILLET
  2016-09-05 12:40 ` marcelo.leitner
  2016-09-05 23:48 ` marcelo.leitner
@ 2016-09-07 15:19 ` Neil Horman
  2016-09-15 17:34 ` Marcelo
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Neil Horman @ 2016-09-07 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe JAILLET
  Cc: marcelo.leitner, vyasevich, davem, linux-sctp, linux-kernel,
	kernel-janitors

On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 11:38:13AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> In commit 311b21774f13 ("sctp: simplify sk_receive_queue locking"), a call
> to 'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' has been made explicit. Previously it was
> hidden in 'sctp_skb_list_tail()'
> 
> Now, the code around it looks redundant. The '_init()' part of
> 'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' should alreday do the same.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> ---
> Un-tested
> ---
>  net/sctp/ulpqueue.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c b/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c
> index 877e55066f89..84d0fdaf7de9 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/ulpqueue.c
> @@ -140,11 +140,8 @@ int sctp_clear_pd(struct sock *sk, struct sctp_association *asoc)
>  		 * we can go ahead and clear out the lobby in one shot
>  		 */
>  		if (!skb_queue_empty(&sp->pd_lobby)) {
> -			struct list_head *list;
>  			skb_queue_splice_tail_init(&sp->pd_lobby,
>  						   &sk->sk_receive_queue);
> -			list = (struct list_head *)&sctp_sk(sk)->pd_lobby;
> -			INIT_LIST_HEAD(list);
>  			return 1;
>  		}
>  	} else {
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sctp: Remove some redundant code
  2016-09-04  9:38 [PATCH] sctp: Remove some redundant code Christophe JAILLET
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-09-07 15:19 ` Neil Horman
@ 2016-09-15 17:34 ` Marcelo
  2016-09-15 19:32   ` Christophe JAILLET
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo @ 2016-09-15 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe JAILLET
  Cc: vyasevich, nhorman, davem, linux-sctp, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors

On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 11:38:13AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> In commit 311b21774f13 ("sctp: simplify sk_receive_queue locking"), a call
> to 'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' has been made explicit. Previously it was
> hidden in 'sctp_skb_list_tail()'
> 
> Now, the code around it looks redundant. The '_init()' part of
> 'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' should alreday do the same.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>

I just noticed you didn't include netdev@ in the destinations.

Is your patch going to be tracked somewhere else? It's not showing up in
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?submitter=66309&state=*&q=&archive=&delegate=

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sctp: Remove some redundant code
  2016-09-15 17:34 ` Marcelo
@ 2016-09-15 19:32   ` Christophe JAILLET
  2016-09-15 20:19     ` Marcelo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Christophe JAILLET @ 2016-09-15 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marcelo
  Cc: vyasevich, nhorman, davem, linux-sctp, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors

Le 15/09/2016 à 19:34, Marcelo a écrit :
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 11:38:13AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> In commit 311b21774f13 ("sctp: simplify sk_receive_queue locking"), a call
>> to 'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' has been made explicit. Previously it was
>> hidden in 'sctp_skb_list_tail()'
>>
>> Now, the code around it looks redundant. The '_init()' part of
>> 'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' should alreday do the same.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> I just noticed you didn't include netdev@ in the destinations.
>
> Is your patch going to be tracked somewhere else? It's not showing up in
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?submitter=66309&state=*&q=&archive=&delegate=
>
My fault, get_maintainer lists netdev@ but I missed it.

Should I resubmit or is it ok?

CJ

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sctp: Remove some redundant code
  2016-09-15 19:32   ` Christophe JAILLET
@ 2016-09-15 20:19     ` Marcelo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo @ 2016-09-15 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe JAILLET
  Cc: vyasevich, nhorman, davem, linux-sctp, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:32:18PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 15/09/2016 à 19:34, Marcelo a écrit :
> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 11:38:13AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > > In commit 311b21774f13 ("sctp: simplify sk_receive_queue locking"), a call
> > > to 'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' has been made explicit. Previously it was
> > > hidden in 'sctp_skb_list_tail()'
> > > 
> > > Now, the code around it looks redundant. The '_init()' part of
> > > 'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' should alreday do the same.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> > I just noticed you didn't include netdev@ in the destinations.
> > 
> > Is your patch going to be tracked somewhere else? It's not showing up in
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?submitter=66309&state=*&q=&archive=&delegate=
> > 
> My fault, get_maintainer lists netdev@ but I missed it.
> 
> Should I resubmit or is it ok?

I guess you need to resubmit then, as it's not showing up in patchwork.

  Marcelo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-15 20:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-09-04  9:38 [PATCH] sctp: Remove some redundant code Christophe JAILLET
2016-09-05 12:40 ` marcelo.leitner
2016-09-05 23:48 ` marcelo.leitner
2016-09-07 15:19 ` Neil Horman
2016-09-15 17:34 ` Marcelo
2016-09-15 19:32   ` Christophe JAILLET
2016-09-15 20:19     ` Marcelo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).