* BUG: 4.10 i915 drm display noise regression - bisected to a6a7cc4b7 @ 2017-01-09 6:32 lkml 2017-01-09 10:24 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Flush untouched framebuffers before display on !llc Chris Wilson ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: lkml @ 2017-01-09 6:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel; +Cc: dri-devel, chris Hello all, I'm experiencing display noise in the form of 8x1 pixel bars spuriously appearing in random locations. This doesn't happen on 4.9, the machine is an X61s, a Core2Duo 1.8Ghz w/XGA via LVDS. I was able to bisect the issue to a6a7cc4b7: commit a6a7cc4b7db6deaeca11cdd38844ea147a354c7a Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Fri Nov 18 21:17:46 2016 +0000 drm/i915: Always flush the dirty CPU cache when pinning the scanout Currently we only clflush the scanout if it is in the CPU domain. Also flush if we have a pending CPU clflush. We also want to treat the dirtyfb path similar, and flush any pending writes there as well. v2: Only send the fb flush message if flushing the dirt on flip v3: Make flush-for-flip and dirtyfb look more alike since they serve similar roles as end-of-frame marker. Reproduction is simple, just run this native drm eye candy program: https://github.com/vcaputo/rototiller Thanks, Vito Caputo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] drm/i915: Flush untouched framebuffers before display on !llc 2017-01-09 6:32 BUG: 4.10 i915 drm display noise regression - bisected to a6a7cc4b7 lkml @ 2017-01-09 10:24 ` Chris Wilson 2017-01-09 10:52 ` Chris Wilson 2017-01-09 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " kbuild test robot 2017-01-09 11:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson 2017-01-30 2:04 ` BUG: 4.10 i915 drm display noise regression - bisected to a6a7cc4b7 lkml 2 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-01-09 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel; +Cc: intel-gfx, lkml, Chris Wilson, # v4 . 10-rc1+ On a non-llc system, the objects are created with .cache_level = CACHE_NONE and so the transition to uncached for scanout is a no-op. However, if the object was never written to, it will still be in the CPU domain (having been zeroed out by shmemfs). Those cachelines need to be flushed prior to display. Reported-by: Vito Caputo Fixes: a6a7cc4b7db6 ("drm/i915: Always flush the dirty CPU cache when pinning the scanout") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org> # v4.10-rc1+ --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index 76689b59fc90..e64d0ea6113d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c @@ -2327,6 +2327,7 @@ static void i915_sg_trim(struct sg_table *orig_st) if (sg_alloc_table(&new_st, orig_st->nents, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN)) return; + new_st->orig_nents = orig_st->orig_nents; /* XXX lies for new_sg = new_st.sgl; for_each_sg(orig_st->sgl, sg, orig_st->nents, i) { sg_set_page(new_sg, sg_page(sg), sg->length, 0); @@ -3514,7 +3515,7 @@ i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, vma->display_alignment = max_t(u64, vma->display_alignment, alignment); /* Treat this as an end-of-frame, like intel_user_framebuffer_dirty() */ - if (obj->cache_dirty) { + if (obj->cache_dirty || obj->base.write_domain == I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU) { i915_gem_clflush_object(obj, true); intel_fb_obj_flush(obj, false, ORIGIN_DIRTYFB); } -- 2.11.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Flush untouched framebuffers before display on !llc 2017-01-09 10:24 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Flush untouched framebuffers before display on !llc Chris Wilson @ 2017-01-09 10:52 ` Chris Wilson 2017-01-09 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " kbuild test robot 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-01-09 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel; +Cc: intel-gfx, lkml, # v4 . 10-rc1+ On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:24:01AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On a non-llc system, the objects are created with .cache_level = > CACHE_NONE and so the transition to uncached for scanout is a no-op. > However, if the object was never written to, it will still be in the CPU > domain (having been zeroed out by shmemfs). Those cachelines need to be > flushed prior to display. > > Reported-by: Vito Caputo > Fixes: a6a7cc4b7db6 ("drm/i915: Always flush the dirty CPU cache when pinning the scanout") > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org> # v4.10-rc1+ > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > index 76689b59fc90..e64d0ea6113d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > @@ -2327,6 +2327,7 @@ static void i915_sg_trim(struct sg_table *orig_st) > if (sg_alloc_table(&new_st, orig_st->nents, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN)) > return; > > + new_st->orig_nents = orig_st->orig_nents; /* XXX lies for Oops. Ignore this chunk! > new_sg = new_st.sgl; > for_each_sg(orig_st->sgl, sg, orig_st->nents, i) { > sg_set_page(new_sg, sg_page(sg), sg->length, 0); > @@ -3514,7 +3515,7 @@ i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, > vma->display_alignment = max_t(u64, vma->display_alignment, alignment); > > /* Treat this as an end-of-frame, like intel_user_framebuffer_dirty() */ > - if (obj->cache_dirty) { > + if (obj->cache_dirty || obj->base.write_domain == I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU) { > i915_gem_clflush_object(obj, true); > intel_fb_obj_flush(obj, false, ORIGIN_DIRTYFB); > } > -- > 2.11.0 > -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Flush untouched framebuffers before display on !llc 2017-01-09 10:24 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Flush untouched framebuffers before display on !llc Chris Wilson 2017-01-09 10:52 ` Chris Wilson @ 2017-01-09 13:48 ` kbuild test robot 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: kbuild test robot @ 2017-01-09 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: kbuild-all, linux-kernel, intel-gfx, lkml, # v4 . 10-rc1+ [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6555 bytes --] Hi Chris, [auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next] [also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc3 next-20170106] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Chris-Wilson/drm-i915-Flush-untouched-framebuffers-before-display-on-llc/20170109-190816 base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next config: x86_64-randconfig-s3-01092001 (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.2.0-3) 6.2.0 20160901 reproduce: # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH=x86_64 All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c: In function 'i915_sg_trim': drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:2303:8: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'struct sg_table') new_st->orig_nents = orig_st->orig_nents; /* XXX lies for ^~ >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:2307:3: error: "/*" within comment [-Werror=comment] /* called before being DMA mapped, no need to copy sg->dma_* */ >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:2295:15: error: unused variable 'i' [-Werror=unused-variable] unsigned int i; ^ >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:2294:22: error: unused variable 'sg' [-Werror=unused-variable] struct scatterlist *sg, *new_sg; ^~ In file included from include/linux/debug_locks.h:6:0, from include/linux/lockdep.h:25, from include/linux/spinlock_types.h:18, from include/linux/mutex.h:15, from include/linux/kernfs.h:13, from include/linux/sysfs.h:15, from include/linux/kobject.h:21, from include/linux/cdev.h:4, from include/drm/drmP.h:36, from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:28: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c: At top level: include/linux/bug.h:45:35: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'void' #define BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(e) ((void)(sizeof((__force long)(e)))) ^ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h:32:26: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID' #define GEM_BUG_ON(expr) BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(expr) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:2310:2: note: in expansion of macro 'GEM_BUG_ON' GEM_BUG_ON(new_sg); /* Should walk exactly nents and hit the end */ ^~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bug.h:45:40: error: expected ')' before '(' token #define BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(e) ((void)(sizeof((__force long)(e)))) ^ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h:32:26: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID' #define GEM_BUG_ON(expr) BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(expr) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:2310:2: note: in expansion of macro 'GEM_BUG_ON' GEM_BUG_ON(new_sg); /* Should walk exactly nents and hit the end */ ^~~~~~~~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:2312:2: error: data definition has no type or storage class [-Werror] sg_free_table(orig_st); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:2312:2: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'sg_free_table' [-Werror=implicit-int] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:2312:2: error: parameter names (without types) in function declaration [-Werror] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:2312:2: error: conflicting types for 'sg_free_table' In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:0, from include/drm/drmP.h:37, from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:28: include/linux/scatterlist.h:260:6: note: previous declaration of 'sg_free_table' was here void sg_free_table(struct sg_table *); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:2314:2: error: data definition has no type or storage class [-Werror] *orig_st = new_st; ^ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:2314:3: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'orig_st' [-Werror=implicit-int] *orig_st = new_st; ^~~~~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:2314:13: error: 'new_st' undeclared here (not in a function) *orig_st = new_st; ^~~~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:2315:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token } ^ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors vim +2307 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c 871dfbd67 Chris Wilson 2016-10-11 2288 #endif 871dfbd67 Chris Wilson 2016-10-11 2289 } 871dfbd67 Chris Wilson 2016-10-11 2290 0c40ce130 Tvrtko Ursulin 2016-11-09 2291 static void i915_sg_trim(struct sg_table *orig_st) 0c40ce130 Tvrtko Ursulin 2016-11-09 2292 { 0c40ce130 Tvrtko Ursulin 2016-11-09 2293 struct sg_table new_st; 0c40ce130 Tvrtko Ursulin 2016-11-09 @2294 struct scatterlist *sg, *new_sg; 0c40ce130 Tvrtko Ursulin 2016-11-09 @2295 unsigned int i; 0c40ce130 Tvrtko Ursulin 2016-11-09 2296 0c40ce130 Tvrtko Ursulin 2016-11-09 2297 if (orig_st->nents == orig_st->orig_nents) 0c40ce130 Tvrtko Ursulin 2016-11-09 2298 return; 0c40ce130 Tvrtko Ursulin 2016-11-09 2299 8bfc478fa Chris Wilson 2016-12-23 2300 if (sg_alloc_table(&new_st, orig_st->nents, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN)) 0c40ce130 Tvrtko Ursulin 2016-11-09 2301 return; 0c40ce130 Tvrtko Ursulin 2016-11-09 2302 ccbf455f4 Chris Wilson 2017-01-09 @2303 new_st->orig_nents = orig_st->orig_nents; /* XXX lies for 0c40ce130 Tvrtko Ursulin 2016-11-09 2304 new_sg = new_st.sgl; 0c40ce130 Tvrtko Ursulin 2016-11-09 2305 for_each_sg(orig_st->sgl, sg, orig_st->nents, i) { 0c40ce130 Tvrtko Ursulin 2016-11-09 2306 sg_set_page(new_sg, sg_page(sg), sg->length, 0); 0c40ce130 Tvrtko Ursulin 2016-11-09 @2307 /* called before being DMA mapped, no need to copy sg->dma_* */ 0c40ce130 Tvrtko Ursulin 2016-11-09 2308 new_sg = sg_next(new_sg); 0c40ce130 Tvrtko Ursulin 2016-11-09 2309 } c2dc6cc94 Chris Wilson 2016-12-19 2310 GEM_BUG_ON(new_sg); /* Should walk exactly nents and hit the end */ :::::: The code at line 2307 was first introduced by commit :::::: 0c40ce130e38aeb9ddcee3ddcffbe5a79f27c080 drm/i915: Trim the object sg table :::::: TO: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> :::::: CC: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation [-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --] [-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 27130 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Flush untouched framebuffers before display on !llc 2017-01-09 6:32 BUG: 4.10 i915 drm display noise regression - bisected to a6a7cc4b7 lkml 2017-01-09 10:24 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Flush untouched framebuffers before display on !llc Chris Wilson @ 2017-01-09 11:19 ` Chris Wilson 2017-01-12 21:17 ` Chris Wilson 2017-02-01 10:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2017-01-30 2:04 ` BUG: 4.10 i915 drm display noise regression - bisected to a6a7cc4b7 lkml 2 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-01-09 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel; +Cc: intel-gfx, lkml, Chris Wilson, # v4 . 10-rc1+ On a non-llc system, the objects are created with .cache_level = CACHE_NONE and so the transition to uncached for scanout is a no-op. However, if the object was never written to, it will still be in the CPU domain (having been zeroed out by shmemfs). Those cachelines need to be flushed prior to display. Reported-by: Vito Caputo Fixes: a6a7cc4b7db6 ("drm/i915: Always flush the dirty CPU cache when pinning the scanout") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org> # v4.10-rc1+ --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index 76689b59fc90..bdb113ef8cfe 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c @@ -3514,7 +3514,7 @@ i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, vma->display_alignment = max_t(u64, vma->display_alignment, alignment); /* Treat this as an end-of-frame, like intel_user_framebuffer_dirty() */ - if (obj->cache_dirty) { + if (obj->cache_dirty || obj->base.write_domain == I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU) { i915_gem_clflush_object(obj, true); intel_fb_obj_flush(obj, false, ORIGIN_DIRTYFB); } -- 2.11.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Flush untouched framebuffers before display on !llc 2017-01-09 11:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson @ 2017-01-12 21:17 ` Chris Wilson 2017-01-12 22:24 ` lkml 2017-02-01 10:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-01-12 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel; +Cc: intel-gfx, lkml, # v4 . 10-rc1+ On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:19:32AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On a non-llc system, the objects are created with .cache_level = > CACHE_NONE and so the transition to uncached for scanout is a no-op. > However, if the object was never written to, it will still be in the CPU > domain (having been zeroed out by shmemfs). Those cachelines need to be > flushed prior to display. > > Reported-by: Vito Caputo > Fixes: a6a7cc4b7db6 ("drm/i915: Always flush the dirty CPU cache when pinning the scanout") > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org> # v4.10-rc1+ Ping? > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > index 76689b59fc90..bdb113ef8cfe 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > @@ -3514,7 +3514,7 @@ i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, > vma->display_alignment = max_t(u64, vma->display_alignment, alignment); > > /* Treat this as an end-of-frame, like intel_user_framebuffer_dirty() */ > - if (obj->cache_dirty) { > + if (obj->cache_dirty || obj->base.write_domain == I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU) { > i915_gem_clflush_object(obj, true); > intel_fb_obj_flush(obj, false, ORIGIN_DIRTYFB); > } > -- > 2.11.0 -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Flush untouched framebuffers before display on !llc 2017-01-12 21:17 ` Chris Wilson @ 2017-01-12 22:24 ` lkml 2017-01-12 22:38 ` Chris Wilson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: lkml @ 2017-01-12 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Wilson, linux-kernel, intel-gfx, # v4 . 10-rc1+ On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 09:17:06PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:19:32AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On a non-llc system, the objects are created with .cache_level = > > CACHE_NONE and so the transition to uncached for scanout is a no-op. > > However, if the object was never written to, it will still be in the CPU > > domain (having been zeroed out by shmemfs). Those cachelines need to be > > flushed prior to display. > > > > Reported-by: Vito Caputo > > Fixes: a6a7cc4b7db6 ("drm/i915: Always flush the dirty CPU cache when pinning the scanout") > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > Cc: <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org> # v4.10-rc1+ > > Ping? This patch fixes the problem for me, in case that's what the ping's for. Out of curiosity the bug I reported described here be getting fixed in 4.10? https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2017-January/128405.html Thanks. > > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > > index 76689b59fc90..bdb113ef8cfe 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > > @@ -3514,7 +3514,7 @@ i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, > > vma->display_alignment = max_t(u64, vma->display_alignment, alignment); > > > > /* Treat this as an end-of-frame, like intel_user_framebuffer_dirty() */ > > - if (obj->cache_dirty) { > > + if (obj->cache_dirty || obj->base.write_domain == I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU) { > > i915_gem_clflush_object(obj, true); > > intel_fb_obj_flush(obj, false, ORIGIN_DIRTYFB); > > } > > -- > > 2.11.0 > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Flush untouched framebuffers before display on !llc 2017-01-12 22:24 ` lkml @ 2017-01-12 22:38 ` Chris Wilson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-01-12 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: lkml; +Cc: linux-kernel, intel-gfx, # v4 . 10-rc1+ On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 04:24:50PM -0600, lkml@pengaru.com wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 09:17:06PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:19:32AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > On a non-llc system, the objects are created with .cache_level = > > > CACHE_NONE and so the transition to uncached for scanout is a no-op. > > > However, if the object was never written to, it will still be in the CPU > > > domain (having been zeroed out by shmemfs). Those cachelines need to be > > > flushed prior to display. > > > > > > Reported-by: Vito Caputo > > > Fixes: a6a7cc4b7db6 ("drm/i915: Always flush the dirty CPU cache when pinning the scanout") > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > > Cc: <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org> # v4.10-rc1+ > > > > Ping? > > This patch fixes the problem for me, in case that's what the ping's for. Partly that, and trying to catch CI + reviewers. > Out of curiosity the bug I reported described here be getting fixed in 4.10? > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2017-January/128405.html It was fixed in the tree back in December, bit of a muddle to get that particular patch into 4.10. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Flush untouched framebuffers before display on !llc 2017-01-09 11:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson 2017-01-12 21:17 ` Chris Wilson @ 2017-02-01 10:24 ` Daniel Vetter 2017-02-01 10:48 ` Chris Wilson 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Daniel Vetter @ 2017-02-01 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: linux-kernel, intel-gfx, lkml, # v4 . 10-rc1+ On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:19:32AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On a non-llc system, the objects are created with .cache_level = > CACHE_NONE and so the transition to uncached for scanout is a no-op. > However, if the object was never written to, it will still be in the CPU > domain (having been zeroed out by shmemfs). Those cachelines need to be > flushed prior to display. > > Reported-by: Vito Caputo > Fixes: a6a7cc4b7db6 ("drm/i915: Always flush the dirty CPU cache when pinning the scanout") > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org> # v4.10-rc1+ > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > index 76689b59fc90..bdb113ef8cfe 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > @@ -3514,7 +3514,7 @@ i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, > vma->display_alignment = max_t(u64, vma->display_alignment, alignment); > > /* Treat this as an end-of-frame, like intel_user_framebuffer_dirty() */ > - if (obj->cache_dirty) { > + if (obj->cache_dirty || obj->base.write_domain == I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU) { Alternatively, should we set cache_dirty when initially allocating an object? Ofc only if cpu_cache_is_coherent, like we do in other places. Anyway, up to you which one you like more I'd say, this one looks correct too. Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> > i915_gem_clflush_object(obj, true); > intel_fb_obj_flush(obj, false, ORIGIN_DIRTYFB); > } > -- > 2.11.0 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Flush untouched framebuffers before display on !llc 2017-02-01 10:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter @ 2017-02-01 10:48 ` Chris Wilson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-02-01 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, intel-gfx, lkml, # v4 . 10-rc1+ On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 11:24:32AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:19:32AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On a non-llc system, the objects are created with .cache_level = > > CACHE_NONE and so the transition to uncached for scanout is a no-op. > > However, if the object was never written to, it will still be in the CPU > > domain (having been zeroed out by shmemfs). Those cachelines need to be > > flushed prior to display. > > > > Reported-by: Vito Caputo > > Fixes: a6a7cc4b7db6 ("drm/i915: Always flush the dirty CPU cache when pinning the scanout") > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > Cc: <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org> # v4.10-rc1+ > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > > index 76689b59fc90..bdb113ef8cfe 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > > @@ -3514,7 +3514,7 @@ i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, > > vma->display_alignment = max_t(u64, vma->display_alignment, alignment); > > > > /* Treat this as an end-of-frame, like intel_user_framebuffer_dirty() */ > > - if (obj->cache_dirty) { > > + if (obj->cache_dirty || obj->base.write_domain == I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU) { > > Alternatively, should we set cache_dirty when initially allocating an > object? Ofc only if cpu_cache_is_coherent, like we do in other places. I thought about it and didn't come to any firm conclusion. Currently "cache_dirty" means omission of clflush, and that's been a source of confusion ever since. I've a patch/plan to do async clflushing which similarly impacts upon the meaning of obj->cache_dirty and interation with frontbuffer tracking, so that seems a reasonable point to which to defer further thought. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: BUG: 4.10 i915 drm display noise regression - bisected to a6a7cc4b7 2017-01-09 6:32 BUG: 4.10 i915 drm display noise regression - bisected to a6a7cc4b7 lkml 2017-01-09 10:24 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Flush untouched framebuffers before display on !llc Chris Wilson 2017-01-09 11:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson @ 2017-01-30 2:04 ` lkml 2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: lkml @ 2017-01-30 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel; +Cc: dri-devel, chris On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 12:32:40AM -0600, lkml@pengaru.com wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm experiencing display noise in the form of 8x1 pixel bars spuriously > appearing in random locations. This doesn't happen on 4.9, the machine > is an X61s, a Core2Duo 1.8Ghz w/XGA via LVDS. > > I was able to bisect the issue to a6a7cc4b7: > > commit a6a7cc4b7db6deaeca11cdd38844ea147a354c7a > Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Date: Fri Nov 18 21:17:46 2016 +0000 > > drm/i915: Always flush the dirty CPU cache when pinning the scanout > > Currently we only clflush the scanout if it is in the CPU domain. Also > flush if we have a pending CPU clflush. We also want to treat the > dirtyfb path similar, and flush any pending writes there as well. > > v2: Only send the fb flush message if flushing the dirt on flip > v3: Make flush-for-flip and dirtyfb look more alike since they serve > similar roles as end-of-frame marker. > > Reproduction is simple, just run this native drm eye candy program: > https://github.com/vcaputo/rototiller > This regression still remains as of 4.10.0-rc6. Chris Wilson had posted a fix: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2420777.html But it seems to have been ignored so far. How do we get this fixed in 4.10 before it ships? Regards, Vito Caputo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-01 10:49 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-01-09 6:32 BUG: 4.10 i915 drm display noise regression - bisected to a6a7cc4b7 lkml 2017-01-09 10:24 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Flush untouched framebuffers before display on !llc Chris Wilson 2017-01-09 10:52 ` Chris Wilson 2017-01-09 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " kbuild test robot 2017-01-09 11:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson 2017-01-12 21:17 ` Chris Wilson 2017-01-12 22:24 ` lkml 2017-01-12 22:38 ` Chris Wilson 2017-02-01 10:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2017-02-01 10:48 ` Chris Wilson 2017-01-30 2:04 ` BUG: 4.10 i915 drm display noise regression - bisected to a6a7cc4b7 lkml
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).