From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
"acme@redhat.com" <acme@redhat.com>,
"jolsa@redhat.com" <jolsa@redhat.com>,
"torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"vincent.weaver@maine.edu" <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
"ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: enable CPU ref_cycles for GP counter
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 08:39:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170523063913.363ssgcy7kmeesye@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBTp5muPs32b7YVbfu57aEKv8aXMS+E08xgjxaOvY+B7wQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:28:26PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 04:55:47PM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:06:21AM -0700, kan.liang@intel.com wrote:
> >> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c index
> >> > > 580b60f..e8b2326 100644
> >> > > --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
> >> > > +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> >> > > @@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ u64 x86_perf_event_update(struct perf_event
> >> > *event)
> >> > > delta = (new_raw_count << shift) - (prev_raw_count << shift);
> >> > > delta >>= shift;
> >> > >
> >> > > + /* Correct the count number if applying ref_cycles replacement */
> >> > > + if (!is_sampling_event(event) &&
> >> > > + (hwc->flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_REF_CYCLES_REP))
> >> > > + delta *= x86_pmu.ref_cycles_factor;
> >> >
> >> > That condition seems wrong, why only correct for !sampling events?
> >> >
> >>
> >> For sampling, it's either fixed freq mode or fixed period mode.
> >> - In the fixed freq mode, we should do nothing, because the adaptive
> >> frequency algorithm will handle it.
> >> - In the fixed period mode, we have already adjusted the period in
> >> ref_cycles_rep().
> >> Therefore, we should only handle !sampling events here.
> >
> > How so? For sampling events the actual event count should also be
> > accurate.
>
> Yes, it must be. Because you can reconstruct the total number of
> occurrences of the event by adding
> all the periods recorded in each sample. So the period in each sample
> must reflect user event and not
> kernel event.
Well, that, but you can equally use read() or the mmap()'ed rdpmc stuff
on a sampling event. The fact that is also generates samples does not
mean it should not also function as a non-sampling event.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-23 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-19 17:06 [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: enable CPU ref_cycles for GP counter kan.liang
2017-05-19 17:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/intel, watchdog: Switch NMI watchdog to ref cycles on x86 kan.liang
2017-05-22 12:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-22 12:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-22 16:58 ` Liang, Kan
2017-05-22 19:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-22 18:20 ` Stephane Eranian
2017-05-22 20:01 ` Andi Kleen
2017-05-22 8:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel: enable CPU ref_cycles for GP counter Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-22 18:15 ` Stephane Eranian
2017-05-22 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-22 12:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-22 16:59 ` Liang, Kan
2017-05-22 16:55 ` Liang, Kan
2017-05-22 19:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-22 19:28 ` Stephane Eranian
2017-05-22 21:51 ` Liang, Kan
2017-05-23 6:39 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-05-23 6:42 ` Stephane Eranian
2017-05-24 15:45 ` Andi Kleen
2017-05-24 16:01 ` Vince Weaver
2017-05-24 16:55 ` Andi Kleen
2017-05-28 20:31 ` Stephane Eranian
2017-05-30 9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-30 13:51 ` Andi Kleen
2017-05-30 16:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-30 16:41 ` Stephane Eranian
2017-05-30 17:22 ` Andi Kleen
2017-05-30 17:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-30 17:51 ` Andi Kleen
2017-05-30 18:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-30 19:40 ` Andi Kleen
2017-05-30 16:39 ` Stephane Eranian
2017-05-30 16:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-05-30 17:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-31 20:57 ` Vince Weaver
2017-05-28 2:56 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170523063913.363ssgcy7kmeesye@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).