From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
colm@allcosts.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
keescook@chromium.org, luto@amacapital.net, wad@chromium.org,
mingo@kernel.org, kirill@shutemov.name, dave.hansen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm,fork,security: introduce MADV_WIPEONFORK
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 09:52:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170808165211.GE31390@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502207168.6577.25.camel@redhat.com>
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 11:46:08AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 08:19 -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > If the use case is fairly specific, then perhaps it makes sense to
> > make MADV_WIPEONFORK not applicable (EINVAL) for mappings where the
> > result is 'questionable'.
>
> That would be a question for Florian and Colm.
>
> If they are OK with MADV_WIPEONFORK only working on
> anonymous VMAs (no file mapping), that certainly could
> be implemented.
>
> On the other hand, I am not sure that introducing cases
> where MADV_WIPEONFORK does not implement wipe-on-fork
> semantics would reduce user confusion...
It'll simply do exactly what it does today, so it won't introduce any
new fallback code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-08 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-06 14:04 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm,fork,security: introduce MADV_WIPEONFORK riel
2017-08-06 14:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86,mpx: make mpx depend on x86-64 to free up VMA flag riel
2017-08-06 14:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm,fork: introduce MADV_WIPEONFORK riel
2017-08-10 15:23 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 15:23 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-11 16:36 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-08-11 16:59 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-11 17:07 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-08-07 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] mm,fork,security: " Michal Hocko
2017-08-07 13:46 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-07 14:19 ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-10 13:06 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-07 14:59 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-09 9:59 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-08-09 12:31 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-09 12:42 ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-10 13:05 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-10 13:23 ` Colm MacCárthaigh
2017-08-10 15:36 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <CAAF6GDeno6RpHf1KORVSxUL7M-CQfbWFFdyKK8LAWd_6PcJ55Q@mail.gmail.com>
2017-08-10 17:01 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-10 22:09 ` Colm MacCárthaigh
2017-08-11 14:06 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 14:11 ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-11 14:24 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 15:24 ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-11 15:31 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <CAAF6GDcNoDUaDSxV6N12A_bOzo8phRUX5b8-OBteuN0AmeCv0g@mail.gmail.com>
2017-08-07 16:02 ` Colm MacCárthaigh
2017-08-10 13:21 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-10 14:11 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-07 18:23 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-08-08 9:58 ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-08 13:15 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-08 15:19 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-08-08 15:22 ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-08 15:46 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-08 16:48 ` Colm MacCárthaigh
2017-08-08 16:52 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2017-08-08 18:45 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-10 15:31 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170808165211.GE31390@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=colm@allcosts.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).