From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, colm@allcosts.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
keescook@chromium.org, luto@amacapital.net, wad@chromium.org,
mingo@kernel.org, kirill@shutemov.name, dave.hansen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm,fork,security: introduce MADV_WIPEONFORK
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 17:22:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aada5d93-9acb-c7c3-348c-044868335a0c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0324df31-717d-32c1-95ef-351c5b23105f@oracle.com>
On 08/08/2017 05:19 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 08/08/2017 06:15 AM, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 11:58 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> On 08/07/2017 08:23 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>>>> If my thoughts above are correct, what about returning EINVAL if
>>>> one
>>>> attempts to set MADV_DONTFORK on mappings set up for sharing?
>>>
>>> That's my preference as well. If there is a use case for shared or
>>> non-anonymous mappings, then we can implement MADV_DONTFORK with the
>>> semantics for this use case. If we pick some arbitrary semantics
>>> now,
>>> without any use case, we might end up with something that's not
>>> actually
>>> useful.
>>
>> MADV_DONTFORK is existing semantics, and it is enforced
>> on shared, non-anonymous mappings. It is frequently used
>> for things like device mappings, which should not be
>> inherited by a child process, because the device can only
>> be used by one process at a time.
>>
>> When someone requests MADV_DONTFORK on a shared VMA, they
>> will get it. The later madvise request overrides the mmap
>> flags that were used earlier.
>>
>> The question is, should MADV_WIPEONFORK (introduced by
>> this series) have not just different semantics, but also
>> totally different behavior from MADV_DONTFORK?
>
> Sorry for the confusion. I accidentally used MADV_DONTFORK instead
> of MADV_WIPEONFORK in my reply (which Florian commented on).
Yes, I made the same mistake. I meant MADV_WIPEONFORK as well.
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-08 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-06 14:04 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm,fork,security: introduce MADV_WIPEONFORK riel
2017-08-06 14:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86,mpx: make mpx depend on x86-64 to free up VMA flag riel
2017-08-06 14:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm,fork: introduce MADV_WIPEONFORK riel
2017-08-10 15:23 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 15:23 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-11 16:36 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-08-11 16:59 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-11 17:07 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-08-07 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] mm,fork,security: " Michal Hocko
2017-08-07 13:46 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-07 14:19 ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-10 13:06 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-07 14:59 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-09 9:59 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-08-09 12:31 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-09 12:42 ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-10 13:05 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-10 13:23 ` Colm MacCárthaigh
2017-08-10 15:36 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <CAAF6GDeno6RpHf1KORVSxUL7M-CQfbWFFdyKK8LAWd_6PcJ55Q@mail.gmail.com>
2017-08-10 17:01 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-10 22:09 ` Colm MacCárthaigh
2017-08-11 14:06 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 14:11 ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-11 14:24 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 15:24 ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-11 15:31 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <CAAF6GDcNoDUaDSxV6N12A_bOzo8phRUX5b8-OBteuN0AmeCv0g@mail.gmail.com>
2017-08-07 16:02 ` Colm MacCárthaigh
2017-08-10 13:21 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-10 14:11 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-07 18:23 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-08-08 9:58 ` Florian Weimer
2017-08-08 13:15 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-08 15:19 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-08-08 15:22 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2017-08-08 15:46 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-08 16:48 ` Colm MacCárthaigh
2017-08-08 16:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-08 18:45 ` Rik van Riel
2017-08-10 15:31 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aada5d93-9acb-c7c3-348c-044868335a0c@redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=colm@allcosts.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).