linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, walken@google.com,
	boqun.feng@gmail.com, kirill@shutemov.name,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org,
	npiggin@gmail.com, kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/14] lockdep: Detect and handle hist_lock ring buffer overwrite
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 16:16:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170809141605.7r3cldc4na3skcnp@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502089981-21272-7-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 04:12:53PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> @@ -4773,14 +4784,28 @@ void lockdep_rcu_suspicious(const char *file, const int line, const char *s)
>   */
>  void crossrelease_hist_start(enum context_t c)
>  {
> -	if (current->xhlocks)
> -		current->xhlock_idx_hist[c] = current->xhlock_idx;
> +	struct task_struct *cur = current;
> +
> +	if (cur->xhlocks) {
> +		cur->xhlock_idx_hist[c] = cur->xhlock_idx;
> +		cur->hist_id_save[c] = cur->hist_id;
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  void crossrelease_hist_end(enum context_t c)
>  {
> -	if (current->xhlocks)
> -		current->xhlock_idx = current->xhlock_idx_hist[c];
> +	struct task_struct *cur = current;
> +
> +	if (cur->xhlocks) {
> +		unsigned int idx = cur->xhlock_idx_hist[c];
> +		struct hist_lock *h = &xhlock(idx);
> +
> +		cur->xhlock_idx = idx;
> +
> +		/* Check if the ring was overwritten. */
> +		if (h->hist_id != cur->hist_id_save[c])
> +			invalidate_xhlock(h);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static int cross_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
> @@ -4826,6 +4851,7 @@ static inline int depend_after(struct held_lock *hlock)
>   * Check if the xhlock is valid, which would be false if,
>   *
>   *    1. Has not used after initializaion yet.
> + *    2. Got invalidated.
>   *
>   * Remind hist_lock is implemented as a ring buffer.
>   */
> @@ -4857,6 +4883,7 @@ static void add_xhlock(struct held_lock *hlock)
>  
>  	/* Initialize hist_lock's members */
>  	xhlock->hlock = *hlock;
> +	xhlock->hist_id = current->hist_id++;
>  
>  	xhlock->trace.nr_entries = 0;
>  	xhlock->trace.max_entries = MAX_XHLOCK_TRACE_ENTRIES;


Hehe, _another_ scheme...

Yes I think this works.. but I had just sort of understood the last one.

How about I do this on top? That I think is a combination of what I
proposed last and your single invalidate thing. Combined they solve the
problem with the least amount of extra storage (a single int).


---
Subject: lockdep: Simplify xhlock ring buffer invalidation
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Wed Aug 9 15:31:27 CEST 2017


Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 include/linux/lockdep.h  |   20 -----------
 include/linux/sched.h    |    4 --
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c |   82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -284,26 +284,6 @@ struct held_lock {
  */
 struct hist_lock {
 	/*
-	 * Id for each entry in the ring buffer. This is used to
-	 * decide whether the ring buffer was overwritten or not.
-	 *
-	 * For example,
-	 *
-	 *           |<----------- hist_lock ring buffer size ------->|
-	 *           pppppppppppppppppppppiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
-	 * wrapped > iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.......................
-	 *
-	 *           where 'p' represents an acquisition in process
-	 *           context, 'i' represents an acquisition in irq
-	 *           context.
-	 *
-	 * In this example, the ring buffer was overwritten by
-	 * acquisitions in irq context, that should be detected on
-	 * rollback or commit.
-	 */
-	unsigned int hist_id;
-
-	/*
 	 * Seperate stack_trace data. This will be used at commit step.
 	 */
 	struct stack_trace	trace;
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -855,9 +855,7 @@ struct task_struct {
 	unsigned int xhlock_idx;
 	/* For restoring at history boundaries */
 	unsigned int xhlock_idx_hist[XHLOCK_NR];
-	unsigned int hist_id;
-	/* For overwrite check at each context exit */
-	unsigned int hist_id_save[XHLOCK_NR];
+	unsigned int xhlock_idx_max;
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_UBSAN
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -4818,26 +4818,65 @@ void crossrelease_hist_start(enum contex
 {
 	struct task_struct *cur = current;
 
-	if (cur->xhlocks) {
+	if (cur->xhlocks)
 		cur->xhlock_idx_hist[c] = cur->xhlock_idx;
-		cur->hist_id_save[c] = cur->hist_id;
-	}
 }
 
 void crossrelease_hist_end(enum context_t c)
 {
 	struct task_struct *cur = current;
+	unsigned int idx;
 
-	if (cur->xhlocks) {
-		unsigned int idx = cur->xhlock_idx_hist[c];
-		struct hist_lock *h = &xhlock(idx);
-
-		cur->xhlock_idx = idx;
-
-		/* Check if the ring was overwritten. */
-		if (h->hist_id != cur->hist_id_save[c])
-			invalidate_xhlock(h);
-	}
+	if (!cur->xhlocks)
+		return;
+
+	idx = cur->xhlock_idx_hist[c];
+	cur->xhlock_idx = idx;
+
+	/*
+	 * A bit of magic here.. this deals with rewinding the (cyclic) history
+	 * array further than its size. IOW. looses the complete history.
+	 *
+	 * We detect this by tracking the previous oldest entry we've (over)
+	 * written in @xhlock_idx_max, this means the next entry is the oldest
+	 * entry still in the buffer, ie. its tail.
+	 *
+	 * So when we restore an @xhlock_idx that is at least MAX_XHLOCKS_NR
+	 * older than @xhlock_idx_max we know we've just wiped the entire
+	 * history.
+	 */
+	if ((cur->xhlock_idx_max - idx) < MAX_XHLOCKS_NR)
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * Now that we know the buffer is effectively empty, reset our state
+	 * such that it appears empty (without in fact clearing the entire
+	 * buffer).
+	 *
+	 * Pick @idx as the 'new' beginning, (re)set all save-points to not
+	 * rewind past it and reset the max. Then invalidate this idx such that
+	 * commit_xhlocks() will never rewind past it. Since xhlock_idx_inc()
+	 * will return the _next_ entry, we'll not overwrite this invalid entry
+	 * until the entire buffer is full again.
+	 */
+	for (c = 0; c < XHLOCK_NR; c++)
+		cur->xhlock_idx_hist[c] = idx;
+	cur->xhlock_idx_max = idx;
+	invalidate_xhlock(&xhlock(idx));
+}
+
+static inline unsigned int xhlock_idx_inc(void)
+{
+	struct task_struct *cur = current;
+	unsigned int idx = ++cur->xhlock_idx;
+
+	/*
+	 * As per the requirement in crossrelease_hist_end(), track the tail.
+	 */
+	if ((int)(cur->xhlock_idx_max - idx) < 0)
+		cur->xhlock_idx_max = idx;
+
+	return idx;
 }
 
 static int cross_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
@@ -4902,7 +4941,7 @@ static inline int xhlock_valid(struct hi
  */
 static void add_xhlock(struct held_lock *hlock)
 {
-	unsigned int idx = ++current->xhlock_idx;
+	unsigned int idx = xhlock_idx_inc();
 	struct hist_lock *xhlock = &xhlock(idx);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP
@@ -4915,7 +4954,6 @@ static void add_xhlock(struct held_lock
 
 	/* Initialize hist_lock's members */
 	xhlock->hlock = *hlock;
-	xhlock->hist_id = current->hist_id++;
 
 	xhlock->trace.nr_entries = 0;
 	xhlock->trace.max_entries = MAX_XHLOCK_TRACE_ENTRIES;
@@ -5071,7 +5109,6 @@ static int commit_xhlock(struct cross_lo
 static void commit_xhlocks(struct cross_lock *xlock)
 {
 	unsigned int cur = current->xhlock_idx;
-	unsigned int prev_hist_id = xhlock(cur).hist_id;
 	unsigned int i;
 
 	if (!graph_lock())
@@ -5091,17 +5128,6 @@ static void commit_xhlocks(struct cross_
 				break;
 
 			/*
-			 * Filter out the cases that the ring buffer was
-			 * overwritten and the previous entry has a bigger
-			 * hist_id than the following one, which is impossible
-			 * otherwise.
-			 */
-			if (unlikely(before(xhlock->hist_id, prev_hist_id)))
-				break;
-
-			prev_hist_id = xhlock->hist_id;
-
-			/*
 			 * commit_xhlock() returns 0 with graph_lock already
 			 * released if fail.
 			 */
@@ -5186,11 +5212,9 @@ void lockdep_init_task(struct task_struc
 	int i;
 
 	task->xhlock_idx = UINT_MAX;
-	task->hist_id = 0;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < XHLOCK_NR; i++) {
 		task->xhlock_idx_hist[i] = UINT_MAX;
-		task->hist_id_save[i] = 0;
 	}
 
 	task->xhlocks = kzalloc(sizeof(struct hist_lock) * MAX_XHLOCKS_NR,

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-09 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-07  7:12 [PATCH v8 00/14] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 01/14] lockdep: Refactor lookup_chain_cache() Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 12:18   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 02/14] lockdep: Add a function building a chain between two classes Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 12:18   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 03/14] lockdep: Change the meaning of check_prev_add()'s return value Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 12:19   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 04/14] lockdep: Make check_prev_add() able to handle external stack_trace Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 12:19   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 05/14] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park
2017-08-09 14:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-10  1:30     ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10  9:21       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-10 12:19   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Implement the 'crossrelease' feature tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 06/14] lockdep: Detect and handle hist_lock ring buffer overwrite Byungchul Park
2017-08-09 14:16   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-08-10  1:32     ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10  9:22       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-10 10:32     ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 11:59   ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-10 12:11     ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 12:51       ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-10 13:17         ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-11  0:44           ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-11  3:43           ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-11  8:03             ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-11  8:52               ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-11  9:44                 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-11 13:06                   ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-14  7:05                     ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-14  7:22                       ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-14  7:29                       ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-11  0:40         ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-11  1:03           ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-10 12:20   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 07/14] lockdep: Handle non(or multi)-acquisition of a crosslock Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 12:20   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 08/14] lockdep: Make print_circular_bug() aware of crossrelease Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 12:21   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 09/14] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to completions Byungchul Park
2017-08-07 10:20   ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-07 11:45   ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-09  9:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-09 10:24     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-10  1:24       ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 12:21   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-08-14  8:50   ` [PATCH v8 09/14] lockdep: " Arnd Bergmann
2017-08-18 23:43     ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-19 12:51       ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-08-19 13:34         ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-08-23 14:43           ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-20  3:18         ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 10/14] pagemap.h: Remove trailing white space Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 11/14] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to PG_locked locks Byungchul Park
2017-08-07 10:36   ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-10  1:35   ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10  9:25     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-05  1:03   ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 12/14] lockdep: Apply lock_acquire(release) on __Set(__Clear)PageLocked Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:13 ` [PATCH v8 13/14] lockdep: Move data of CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK from page to page_ext Byungchul Park
2017-08-07 10:43   ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-07  7:13 ` [PATCH v8 14/14] lockdep: Crossrelease feature documentation Byungchul Park
2017-08-07 15:58   ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-10 12:22   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Add 'crossrelease' " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-08-09 15:50 ` [PATCH v8 00/14] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-10  0:55   ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10  3:47     ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 10:52     ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10  9:37   ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 10:52     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-10 11:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-08-10 11:45   ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-14 10:57     ` Ingo Molnar
2017-08-14 11:10       ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-15  8:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-08-16  0:16   ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-16  4:05     ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-16  4:37       ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-16  5:40         ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-16  6:37           ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-16  5:05       ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-16  5:58         ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-16  7:14           ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-16  8:06             ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-16  9:38               ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-17  7:48       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-08-17  8:04         ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-17  8:12           ` Ingo Molnar
2017-08-17  8:33             ` Boqun Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170809141605.7r3cldc4na3skcnp@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).