Re: [PATCH v8 00/14] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature

[Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>]

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:57:48PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 01:10:19PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > 
> > > * Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Change from v7
> > > > 	- rebase on latest tip/sched/core (Jul 26 2017)
> > > > 	- apply peterz's suggestions
> > > > 	- simplify code of crossrelease_{hist/soft/hard}_{start/end}
> > > > 	- exclude a patch avoiding redundant links
> > > > 	- exclude a patch already applied onto the base
> > > 
> > > Ok, it's looking pretty good here now, there's one thing I'd like you to change, 
> > > please remove all the new Kconfig dependencies:
> > > 
> > >  CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE=y
> > >  CONFIG_LOCKDEP_COMPLETE=y
> > > 
> > > and make it all part of PROVE_LOCKING, like most of the other lock debugging bits.
> > 
> > OK. I will remove them. What about CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK? Should I also
> > remove it?
> 
> So I'd only remove the forced _configurability_ - we can still keep those 
> variables just fine. They modularize the code and they might be useful later on if 
> for some reason there's some really bad performance aspect that would make one of 
> these lockdep components to be configured out by default.
> 
> Just make the user interface sane - i.e. only one switch needed to enable full 
> lockdep. Internal modularization is fine, as long as it's not ugly and the user is 
> not burdened with it.

Agree.

Thank you,
Byungchul