linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	walken@google.com, kirill@shutemov.name,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org,
	npiggin@gmail.com, kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/14] lockdep: Detect and handle hist_lock ring buffer overwrite
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 19:59:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170810115922.kegrfeg6xz7mgpj4@tardis> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502089981-21272-7-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6408 bytes --]

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 04:12:53PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> The ring buffer can be overwritten by hardirq/softirq/work contexts.
> That cases must be considered on rollback or commit. For example,
> 
>           |<------ hist_lock ring buffer size ----->|
>           ppppppppppppiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
> wrapped > iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii....................
> 
>           where 'p' represents an acquisition in process context,
>           'i' represents an acquisition in irq context.
> 
> On irq exit, crossrelease tries to rollback idx to original position,
> but it should not because the entry already has been invalid by
> overwriting 'i'. Avoid rollback or commit for entries overwritten.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/lockdep.h  | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/sched.h    |  3 +++
>  kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
> index 0c8a1b8..48c244c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
> @@ -284,6 +284,26 @@ struct held_lock {
>   */
>  struct hist_lock {
>  	/*
> +	 * Id for each entry in the ring buffer. This is used to
> +	 * decide whether the ring buffer was overwritten or not.
> +	 *
> +	 * For example,
> +	 *
> +	 *           |<----------- hist_lock ring buffer size ------->|
> +	 *           pppppppppppppppppppppiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
> +	 * wrapped > iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.......................
> +	 *
> +	 *           where 'p' represents an acquisition in process
> +	 *           context, 'i' represents an acquisition in irq
> +	 *           context.
> +	 *
> +	 * In this example, the ring buffer was overwritten by
> +	 * acquisitions in irq context, that should be detected on
> +	 * rollback or commit.
> +	 */
> +	unsigned int hist_id;
> +
> +	/*
>  	 * Seperate stack_trace data. This will be used at commit step.
>  	 */
>  	struct stack_trace	trace;
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 5becef5..373466b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -855,6 +855,9 @@ struct task_struct {
>  	unsigned int xhlock_idx;
>  	/* For restoring at history boundaries */
>  	unsigned int xhlock_idx_hist[CONTEXT_NR];
> +	unsigned int hist_id;
> +	/* For overwrite check at each context exit */
> +	unsigned int hist_id_save[CONTEXT_NR];
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_UBSAN
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> index afd6e64..5168dac 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> @@ -4742,6 +4742,17 @@ void lockdep_rcu_suspicious(const char *file, const int line, const char *s)
>  static atomic_t cross_gen_id; /* Can be wrapped */
>  
>  /*
> + * Make an entry of the ring buffer invalid.
> + */
> +static inline void invalidate_xhlock(struct hist_lock *xhlock)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Normally, xhlock->hlock.instance must be !NULL.
> +	 */
> +	xhlock->hlock.instance = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/*
>   * Lock history stacks; we have 3 nested lock history stacks:
>   *
>   *   Hard IRQ
> @@ -4773,14 +4784,28 @@ void lockdep_rcu_suspicious(const char *file, const int line, const char *s)
>   */
>  void crossrelease_hist_start(enum context_t c)
>  {
> -	if (current->xhlocks)
> -		current->xhlock_idx_hist[c] = current->xhlock_idx;
> +	struct task_struct *cur = current;
> +
> +	if (cur->xhlocks) {
> +		cur->xhlock_idx_hist[c] = cur->xhlock_idx;
> +		cur->hist_id_save[c] = cur->hist_id;
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  void crossrelease_hist_end(enum context_t c)
>  {
> -	if (current->xhlocks)
> -		current->xhlock_idx = current->xhlock_idx_hist[c];
> +	struct task_struct *cur = current;
> +
> +	if (cur->xhlocks) {
> +		unsigned int idx = cur->xhlock_idx_hist[c];
> +		struct hist_lock *h = &xhlock(idx);
> +
> +		cur->xhlock_idx = idx;
> +
> +		/* Check if the ring was overwritten. */
> +		if (h->hist_id != cur->hist_id_save[c])

Could we use:

		if (h->hist_id != idx)

here, and

> +			invalidate_xhlock(h);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static int cross_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
> @@ -4826,6 +4851,7 @@ static inline int depend_after(struct held_lock *hlock)
>   * Check if the xhlock is valid, which would be false if,
>   *
>   *    1. Has not used after initializaion yet.
> + *    2. Got invalidated.
>   *
>   * Remind hist_lock is implemented as a ring buffer.
>   */
> @@ -4857,6 +4883,7 @@ static void add_xhlock(struct held_lock *hlock)
>  
>  	/* Initialize hist_lock's members */
>  	xhlock->hlock = *hlock;
> +	xhlock->hist_id = current->hist_id++;

use:

	xhlock->hist_id = idx;

and,


>  
>  	xhlock->trace.nr_entries = 0;
>  	xhlock->trace.max_entries = MAX_XHLOCK_TRACE_ENTRIES;
> @@ -4995,6 +5022,7 @@ static int commit_xhlock(struct cross_lock *xlock, struct hist_lock *xhlock)
>  static void commit_xhlocks(struct cross_lock *xlock)
>  {
>  	unsigned int cur = current->xhlock_idx;
> +	unsigned int prev_hist_id = xhlock(cur).hist_id;

use:
	unsigned int prev_hist_id = cur;

here.

Then we can get away with the added fields in task_struct at least.

Thought?

Regards,
Boqun

>  	unsigned int i;
>  
>  	if (!graph_lock())
> @@ -5013,6 +5041,17 @@ static void commit_xhlocks(struct cross_lock *xlock)
>  			break;
>  
>  		/*
> +		 * Filter out the cases that the ring buffer was
> +		 * overwritten and the previous entry has a bigger
> +		 * hist_id than the following one, which is impossible
> +		 * otherwise.
> +		 */
> +		if (unlikely(before(xhlock->hist_id, prev_hist_id)))
> +			break;
> +
> +		prev_hist_id = xhlock->hist_id;
> +
> +		/*
>  		 * commit_xhlock() returns 0 with graph_lock already
>  		 * released if fail.
>  		 */
> @@ -5085,9 +5124,12 @@ void lockdep_init_task(struct task_struct *task)
>  	int i;
>  
>  	task->xhlock_idx = UINT_MAX;
> +	task->hist_id = 0;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < CONTEXT_NR; i++)
> +	for (i = 0; i < CONTEXT_NR; i++) {
>  		task->xhlock_idx_hist[i] = UINT_MAX;
> +		task->hist_id_save[i] = 0;
> +	}
>  
>  	task->xhlocks = kzalloc(sizeof(struct hist_lock) * MAX_XHLOCKS_NR,
>  				GFP_KERNEL);
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-10 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-07  7:12 [PATCH v8 00/14] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 01/14] lockdep: Refactor lookup_chain_cache() Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 12:18   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 02/14] lockdep: Add a function building a chain between two classes Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 12:18   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 03/14] lockdep: Change the meaning of check_prev_add()'s return value Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 12:19   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 04/14] lockdep: Make check_prev_add() able to handle external stack_trace Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 12:19   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 05/14] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park
2017-08-09 14:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-10  1:30     ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10  9:21       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-10 12:19   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Implement the 'crossrelease' feature tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 06/14] lockdep: Detect and handle hist_lock ring buffer overwrite Byungchul Park
2017-08-09 14:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-10  1:32     ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10  9:22       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-10 10:32     ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 11:59   ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2017-08-10 12:11     ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 12:51       ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-10 13:17         ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-11  0:44           ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-11  3:43           ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-11  8:03             ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-11  8:52               ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-11  9:44                 ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-11 13:06                   ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-14  7:05                     ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-14  7:22                       ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-14  7:29                       ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-11  0:40         ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-11  1:03           ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-10 12:20   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 07/14] lockdep: Handle non(or multi)-acquisition of a crosslock Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 12:20   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 08/14] lockdep: Make print_circular_bug() aware of crossrelease Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 12:21   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 09/14] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to completions Byungchul Park
2017-08-07 10:20   ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-07 11:45   ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-09  9:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-09 10:24     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-10  1:24       ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 12:21   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-08-14  8:50   ` [PATCH v8 09/14] lockdep: " Arnd Bergmann
2017-08-18 23:43     ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-19 12:51       ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-08-19 13:34         ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-08-23 14:43           ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-20  3:18         ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 10/14] pagemap.h: Remove trailing white space Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 11/14] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to PG_locked locks Byungchul Park
2017-08-07 10:36   ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-10  1:35   ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10  9:25     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-05  1:03   ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:12 ` [PATCH v8 12/14] lockdep: Apply lock_acquire(release) on __Set(__Clear)PageLocked Byungchul Park
2017-08-07  7:13 ` [PATCH v8 13/14] lockdep: Move data of CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK from page to page_ext Byungchul Park
2017-08-07 10:43   ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-07  7:13 ` [PATCH v8 14/14] lockdep: Crossrelease feature documentation Byungchul Park
2017-08-07 15:58   ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-10 12:22   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Add 'crossrelease' " tip-bot for Byungchul Park
2017-08-09 15:50 ` [PATCH v8 00/14] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-10  0:55   ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10  3:47     ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 10:52     ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10  9:37   ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-10 10:52     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-10 11:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-08-10 11:45   ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-14 10:57     ` Ingo Molnar
2017-08-14 11:10       ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-15  8:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-08-16  0:16   ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-16  4:05     ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-16  4:37       ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-16  5:40         ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-16  6:37           ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-16  5:05       ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-16  5:58         ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-16  7:14           ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-16  8:06             ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-16  9:38               ` Byungchul Park
2017-08-17  7:48       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-08-17  8:04         ` Boqun Feng
2017-08-17  8:12           ` Ingo Molnar
2017-08-17  8:33             ` Boqun Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170810115922.kegrfeg6xz7mgpj4@tardis \
    --to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).