linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com
Cc: timmurray@google.com, joelaf@google.com, surenb@google.com,
	Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	"Dennis Zhou (Facebook)" <dennisszhou@gmail.com>,
	Prashant Dhamdhere <pdhamdhe@redhat.com>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] Document /proc/pid PID reuse behavior
Date: Mon,  5 Nov 2018 13:22:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181105132205.138695-1-dancol@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181031150625.147369-1-dancol@google.com>

State explicitly that holding a /proc/pid file descriptor open does
not reserve the PID. Also note that in the event of PID reuse, these
open file descriptors refer to the old, now-dead process, and not the
new one that happens to be named the same numeric PID.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>
---
 Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

Moved paragraphed to start of /proc/pid section; added signed-off-by.

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
index 12a5e6e693b6..0b14460f721d 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
@@ -125,6 +125,13 @@ process running on the system, which is named after the process ID (PID).
 The link  self  points  to  the  process reading the file system. Each process
 subdirectory has the entries listed in Table 1-1.
 
+Note that an open a file descriptor to /proc/<pid> or to any of its
+contained files or subdirectories does not prevent <pid> being reused
+for some other process in the event that <pid> exits. Operations on
+open /proc/<pid> file descriptors corresponding to dead processes
+never act on any new process that the kernel may, through chance, have
+also assigned the process ID <pid>. Instead, operations on these FDs
+usually fail with ESRCH.
 
 Table 1-1: Process specific entries in /proc
 ..............................................................................
-- 
2.19.1.930.g4563a0d9d0-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-05 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-31 15:06 [PATCH] Document /proc/pid PID reuse behavior Daniel Colascione
2018-11-01  7:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-11-05 13:22 ` Daniel Colascione [this message]
2018-11-06  6:01   ` [PATCH v2] " Mike Rapoport
2018-11-07 17:16     ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-11-07 18:21       ` Daniel Colascione
2018-11-06 13:05   ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-07 15:48     ` Daniel Colascione
2018-11-07 16:00       ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-07 16:10         ` Daniel Colascione
2018-11-07 16:19           ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-19 11:16           ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-11-07 17:04         ` Martin Steigerwald
2018-11-08 12:02           ` David Laight
2018-11-08 12:27             ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-11-08 13:42               ` David Laight
2018-11-08 14:07                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-11-08 14:14                   ` David Laight
2018-11-08 13:25           ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-19 10:54   ` Pavel Machek
2018-11-19 16:24     ` Daniel Colascione
2018-11-20  8:50       ` Pavel Machek
2018-11-20  9:05     ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-11-20  9:18       ` Pavel Machek
2018-11-20 17:39         ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-11-20 17:48           ` Daniel Colascione
2018-11-20 17:59             ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-11-20 16:37       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-20 16:49       ` Jonathan Corbet
2018-11-20 16:57         ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181105132205.138695-1-dancol@google.com \
    --to=dancol@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dennisszhou@gmail.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pdhamdhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=timmurray@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).